Abstract
The alleged problem of the dirty hands of politicians has been much discussed since Michael Walzer’s original piece (Walzer 1974). The discussion has concerned the precise nature of the problem or sought to dissolve the apparent paradox. However there has been little discussion of the putative complicity, and thus also dirtying of hands, of a democratic public that authorizes politicians to act in its name. This article outlines the sense in which politicians do get dirty hands and the degree to which a democratic public may also get dirty hands. It separates the questions of secrecy, authorisation, and wrongfulness in order to spell out the extent of public complicity. Finally it addresses the ways in which those who do and those who do not acknowledge the problem of dirty hands erroneously discount or deny the problem of complicity by an appeal to the nature of democracy, a putatively essential need for political openness or to the scope of ideal theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I am very grateful to two anonymous referees for the journal whose comments have helped me greatly to improve this article.
References
Bellamy R (2010) Dirty hands and clean gloves: liberal ideals and real politics. Eur J Polit Theor 9(4):412–430
Coady CAJ (1993) Politics and the problem of dirty hands. In: Singer P (ed) A companion to ethics, 2nd edn. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 532–540
Coady CAJ (2012) The problem of dirty hands. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/. Last accessed 04.07.2012
Cullity G (2007) The moral, the personal, and the political. In: Primoratz I (ed) Politics and morality. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 54–75
Galston W (2010) Realism in political theory. Eur J Polit Theor 9(4):385–411
Gaus GF (2005) Dirty hands. In: Frey RG, Wellman CH (eds) A companion to applied ethics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, Chapter 13
Geuss R (2008) Philosophy and real politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Goodin R, Pettit P (2006) Contemporary political philosophy, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Hampshire S (1978) Public and private morality. In: Hampshire S (ed) Public and private morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–54
Hollis M (1982) Dirty hands. Br J Polit Sci 12:385–398
Howard WK (1977) Must public hands be dirty? J Value Inq XI:29–40
Kymlicka W (2002) Contemporary political philosophy, an introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lincoln A (1864) Letter to A.G. Hodges. In: The Oxford dictionary of quotations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lukes S (2006) Liberal-democratic torture. Br J Polit Sci 36(1):1–16
McConnell TC (1996) Moral residues and dilemmas. In: Mason HE (ed) Moral dilemmas and moral theory. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 36–45
Mendus S (2009) Politics and morality. Polity Press, Oxford
Michels R (1962) Political parties, a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Translated by Paul, E. and C., Introduction by Lipset, S.M. The Free Press, New York
Nielsen K (2000) There is no dilemma of dirty hands. In: Ryman P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 139–155
Pasternak A (2011) The collective responsibility of democratic publics. Can J Philos 41(1):99–124
Phillips M (1985) Reflections on the transition from ideal to non-ideal theory. Nous 19(4):551–570
Rawls J (1999a) A theory of justice. Revised edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Rawls J (1999b) The law of peoples, with “the idea of public reason revisited”. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Sartre J-P (1958) Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. Translated from L’Être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique [1943] by Hazel Barnes. Routledge, London, p 97
Shue H (1978) Torture. Philos Publ Aff 7(2):124–143
Shue H (2009) Making exceptions. J Appl Philos 26(3):307–322
Shugarman DP (2000) Democratic dirty hands? In: Rynard P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 229–249
Sorell T (2000) Politics, power, and partisanship. In: Rynard P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 67–86
Stemplowska Z (2008) What’s ideal about ideal theory? Soc Theor Pract 34(3):319–340
Stocker M (2000) Dirty hands and ordinary life. In: Ryman P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 27–42
Sutherland SL (2000) Retrospection and democracy: Bringing political conduct under the constitution. In: Rynard P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 207–227
Swift A (2008) The value of philosophy in nonideal circumstances. Soc Theor Pract 34(3):363–388
Wall SP (1996) Public justification and the transparency argument. Philos Q 46(185):501–507
Walzer, M (1974) Political action: the problem of dirty hands. In: Cohen M, Nagel T and Scanlon T (eds) War and moral responsibility. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 62–82
Weber M (1948) Politics as a vocation. In: Girth HH, Mills CW (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 77–128
Williams B (1978) Politics and moral character. In: Hampshire S (ed) Public and private morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 55–73
Williams B (2007) In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument edited by Geoffrey Hawthorn. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Yeo M (2000) Dirty hands in politics: On the one hand, and on the other. In: Ryman P, Shugarman DP (eds) Cruelty and deception: The controversy over dirty hands in politics. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp 157–176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Archard, D. Dirty Hands and the Complicity of the Democratic Public. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 16, 777–790 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9387-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9387-y