Abstract
For Gianni Vattimo, the renunciation of violence is the starting point for constructing a post foundational politics. So far, criticism of Vattimo’s argument has focused on his larger commitment to metaphysical nihilism and whether the renunciation of violence is a thicker principle than his post foundational philosophy can support. I argue that Vattimo’s renunciation of violence can also be criticized for two other reasons. First, Vattimo attempts to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable uses of violence through an under developed idea of self-defense. Second, despite his attention to the political and philosophical impact of mass communications technology, Vattimo ignores emerging technological challenges to our understanding of violence. Nonetheless, I argue that Vattimo’s renunciation can still serve as a useful starting point for contemporary political thinking. What Vattimo’s logic shows is that we can enhance the moral standing of democracy by decisively detaching its practices and institutions from historical artifacts of political violence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amnesty International. USA: Excessive and lethal force? Amnesty International’s concerns about deaths and ill-treatment involving tasers. AI Index: AMR 51/139/2004
Arendt H (1970) On violence. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York
Butler J (2009) Frames of war: When is life grievable? Verso, New York
Debord G (2005) Society of the spectacle. AK Press, Oakland
Katznelson I (2003) Desolation and enlightenment: Political knowledge after total war, totalitarianism, and the holocaust. Columbia University Press, New York
Lasn K (2000) Culture jam. Harper Collins, New York
Lewer N (2003) Non-lethal weapons: operational and policy developments. Lancet 362(Supplement 1):20–21
Lorenz FM (1996) Non lethal force: the slippery slope to war? Parameters 52–62
Luxon N (2008) Ethics and subjectivity: practices of self-governance in the late lectures of Michel Foucault. Polit Theory 36(3):377–402
Marchart O (2007) Post foundational political thought. University of Edinburgh Press, Edinburgh
Martin J (2010) A radical freedom? Gianni Vattimo’s ‘emancipatory nihilism’. Contemp Polit Theory 9(3):325–344
Miller TH (2008) The two deaths of Lady McDuff: antimetaphysics, violence, and William Davenant’s restoration revision of Macbeth. Polit Theory 36(6):856–882
Miller TH (2009) In Hermeneutic circles: A reply to white. Polit Theory 37(6):817–822
Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, New York
Rappert B (2003) Non-lethal weapons as legitimizing forces? Frank Cass, London
Rose DE (2002) The ethical claims of Il Pensiero Debole: Gianni Vattimo, pluralism, and postmodern subjectivity. Angelaki 7(3):63–79
Schinkel W (2010) Aspects of violence: A critical theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Vattimo G (1992) The transparent society. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Vattimo G (2003) Ethics without transcendence. trs. by Santiago Zabala, Common Knowl 9(3)
Vattimo G (2004) Nihilism and emancipation. Columbia University Press, New York
Vattimo G (2007) Toward a non religious christianity. In: Caputo JD, Vattimo G, Robbins JW (eds) After the death of God. Columbia University Press, New York
Vattimo G, Zabala S (2002) Weak thought and the reduction of violence: a dialogue with Gianni Vattimo. Common Knowl 8(3)
White SK (2000) Sustaining affirmation: The strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
White SK (2009) Violence, weak ontology, and late modernity. Polit Theory 37(6):808–817
Zizek S (2008) Violence. Picador, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindsey, J.R. Vattimo’s Renunciation of Violence. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 16, 99–111 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9324-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9324-5