Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 169–184

Cynicism and Morality

Article
  • 252 Downloads

Abstract

Our attitude towards cynicism is ambivalent: On the one hand we condemn it as a character failing and a trend that is undermining political and social life; on the other hand, we are often impressed by the apparent realism and honesty of the cynic. My aim in this paper is to offer an account of cynicism that can explain both our attraction and aversion. After defending a particular conception of cynicism, I argue that most of the work in explaining the fault of cynicism can be done by referring not to the cynic’s beliefs about humanity, but to the attitude cultivated as a response to that belief. This attitude is hostile to the virtues of faith, hope and charity, upon which relationships and our sense of moral community depend. In conclusion, I suggest that holding the cynical belief is itself immoral, and that cynicism is disrespectful and destructive of morality.

Keywords

Cynicism Morality Faith Hope Love 

References

  1. Adams RM (1995) Moral faith. The Journal of Philosophy 92:75–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aristotle (1976) The ethics of Aristotle: the Nicomachean Ethics, tr. J.A.K. Thomson. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  3. Blum L (1988) Moral exemplars: reflections on Schindler, the Trocmes, and others. In: French PA et al (eds) Ethical theory: character and virtue (Midwest Studies in Philosophy13). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovens L (1999) The value of hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59:667–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cottingham J (2006) What difference does it make? The nature and significance of theistic belief. Ratio 19:401–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Quincey Thomas (1827) On murder; considered as one of the fine arts. http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nael/noa/pdf/27636_Roma_U13_Quincey.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2010
  7. Diamond C (1978) Eating meat and eating people. Philosophy 53:465–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forster EM (1973) Howards end. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaita R (2000) A common humanity, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Garland A (1997) The beach. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldfarb JC (1991) The cynical society: the culture of politics and the politics of culture in American life. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Golding W (1958) Lord of the flies. Faber and Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. James H (1936) The Princess Casamassima [1886]. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones WE, Martin T (2004) Immoral believing. Special Issue of Philosophical Papers 33Google Scholar
  15. La Rochefoucauld F (1959) The Maxims of La Rochefoucauld [1665], tr. Louis Kronenberger. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lear J (2006) Radical hope: ethics in the face of cultural devastation. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Levi P (1987) If this is a man and the truce, tr. Stuart Woolf. Abacus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Norton DL (1988) Moral minimalism and the development of moral character. In: French PA et al (eds) Ethical theory: character and virtue (Midwest Studies in Philosophy13). University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  19. Nussbaum Martha (1986) The fragility of goodness. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Wiesel E (2006) Night, tr. Marion Wiesel. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilde O (1969) Lady Windermere’s fan. Methuen and Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolf S (1982) Moral Saints. The Journal of Philosophy 79:419–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yoos G (1985) The rhetoric of cynicism. Rhetoric Review 4:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations