Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism’s Main flaws

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Distinguishing between reasonable partiality and reasonable impartiality makes a difference in resolving the serious clashes between ‘priority for compatriots’ versus cosmopolitan global duties. Defenders of a priority for compatriots have to acknowledge two strong moral constraints: states have to fulfil all their special, domestic and trans-domestic duties, and associative duties are limited by distributive constraints resulting from the moral duty to fight poverty and gross global inequalities. In the recent global context, I see four main problems for liberal-nationalist defenders of priority for compatriots: (i) Reasonable particularists often forget that associative duties for compatriots compete with many sub-national and trans-domestic associative duties. (ii) They tend to forget that associative national duties compete with other, strong special (contractual, reparative) obligations regarding not only citizens and residents inside nation-states but also trans-domestic obligations across state borders. (iii) They do not properly discuss the problem of unallocated duties in addressing global poverty and insecurity. (iv) The design of supra-national and global ‘mediating’ institutions, and the crafting of policies to remedy the misallocation of duties and to coordinate the required state activities is an urgent task neglected by liberal nationalists. In the recent context, reasonable partiality’s bias towards partiality is most unwelcome and morally dubious. Reasonable impartiality’s bias towards cosmopolitanism helps to stimulate a drastic shift in obligations and stimulates productive trans-national institutional design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bader, V.M., Macht of Waarheid. In: Kennis en Methode 12(2) (1988), pp. 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Citizenship and Exclusion. In: Political Theory 23(2) (1995a), pp. 211– 246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Reply to Michael Walzer. In: Political Theory 23(2) (1995b), pp. 250–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Fairly Open Borders. In: Bader, V. (ed.) Citizenship and Exclusion. Houndsmill/London: MacMillan, 1997, pp. 28–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., The Cultural Conditions of Transnational Citizenship. In: Political Theory 25/6 (1997a), pp. 771–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Dilemmas of Ethnic Affirmative Action. Benign State-Neutrality or Relational Ethnic Neutrality. In: Citizenship Studies 2(3) (1998), pp. 435–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Egalitarian Multiculturalism: Institutional Separation and Cultural Pluralism. In: Rainer Bauböck/John Rundell (eds.), Blurred Boundaries. Ashgate, Aldershot, Chapter 7 (1998a), pp. 185–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., For Love of Country. In: Political Theory, 27:3 (1999), pp. 379–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Culture and Identity. Contesting Constructivism. In: Ethnicities 1(2) (2001), pp. 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Ethnic and religious state-neutrality: utopia or myth? Unpublished Ms, 2001a.

  • Bader, V.M., Democratic Institutional Pluralism and Cultural Diversity. In: Juteau, Danielle/Harzig, Christiane (eds.), The Social Construction of Diversity. New York, Oxford: Berghan, 2003, pp. 131–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M. and Engelen, E., Taking Pluralism Seriously. Arguing for an Institutional Turn in Political Philosophy. in: Philosophy and Social Criticism 29/6 (2003), pp. 375–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M. and Saharso, S., Contextualized Morality. Introduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (2004), pp. 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bader, V.M., Building European Institutions. Beyond Strong Ties and Weak Commitments. Forthcoming in: Shapiro, I./Benhabib, S. (eds.), 2005.

  • Bader, V.M., Immigration. Forthcoming in: Constellations, 2005a, Simon Caney/Percy Lehning (eds.), International Distributive Justice. Routledge.

  • Barry, B. and Goodin, R.E. (eds.), Free Movement. Ethical Issues in the Transnational Migration of People and of money}. New York, London etc, 1992.

  • Bauböck, R., Transnational Citizenship. Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994.

  • Bauböck, R., Political Boundaries in a Multilevel Democracy. Forthcoming in: Shapiro, I., and Benhabib, S. (eds.), 2005.

  • Beitz, C.R., Justice and International Relations. In: Beitz et al. (eds.), 1985, pp. 282–311.

  • Beitz, C.R., Sovereignty and Morality in International Affairs. In: Held (ed.), 1991, pp. 236–254.

  • Beitz, C.R., Cohen, M., Scanlon, T. and Simmons, A. (eds.), International Ethics. Princeton, 1985.

  • Caney, S., Individuals, Nations, and Obligations. In: Caney George, D. Jones, P. (eds.), National Rights, International Obligations. Boulder: Westview Press, 1996, pp. 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J.H., Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective, in: Barry/Goodin (eds.), Free Movement, 1992, pp. 25–47.

  • Carens, J.H., Culture, Citizenship, and Community. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, A., Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfstrø m, G., Ethics for a shrinking world. Houndsmill/London: MacMillan, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelen, E., Openness and Protection. Forthcoming in: Politics and Society 31(4) (2003), 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fø llesdal, A., Do Welfare Obligations End at the Boundaries of the Nation State? In: Koslowski/Fø llesdal (eds.), Restructuring the Welfare State. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997, pp. 145–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galston, W., Liberal Pluralism. Cambridge: C University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E., What is so Special about Our Fellow Countrymen? In: Ethics 98 (1988), pp. 663–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker-Cordon, C., Our Deliberative Situation. Chapter Two of PhD. Unpublished Manuscript, 2003.

  • Hayward, C., Binding Problems, Boundary Problems: The Trouble with “Democratic Citizenship”. Forthcoming in: Shapiro, I., and Benhabib, S. (eds.), 2005.

  • Jones, C., Global Justice. Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy. 2 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A., Is Patriotism a Virtue? Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas, 1984.

  • Miller, D., Market, State, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Reasonable Partiality and Priority for Compatriots, 8 (2005) pp. 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, S., Patriotism, Morality, and Peace. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., For Love of Country. Edited by J. Cohen. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.

  • Offe, C., Demokratie und Wohlfahrtstaat. In: Streeck, W. (ed.), Internationale Wirtschaft, National Demokratie. Frankfurt M.: Campus, 1998, pp. 99–136.

  • Perry, S., Immigration, Justice, and Culture. In: Schwartz. W. (ed.) Justice in Immigration. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995, pp. 94–135.

  • Pogge, T.W., An Egalitarian Law of Peoples. In: Philosophy and Public Affairs; 1994, pp. 195–224.

  • Pogge, T.W., Global Justice. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T.W., World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S., Boundaries and Allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, W.F. (ed.), Justice in Immigration. Cambridge/Mass: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H., Basic Rights. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H., Mediating Duties, in: Ethics 98 (1988), pp. 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R., Law’s Races. Conference “Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiances”. Yale Univ., October 3–5. Forthcoming in: Seyla Benhabib, Ian Shapiro, and Danilo Petranovich (eds.), Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, 2006.

  • Stoep, J.v.d., Towards a Sociological Turn in Contextualist Moral Philosophy. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7(2) (2004), pp. 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolcke, V., The ‘Nature’ of Nationality. In: Bader, V. (ed.) Citizenship and Exclusion. Houndsmill: MacMillan Press, 1997, pp. 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Y., Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, P., Living High & Letting Die. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viroli, M., For Love of County. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Thick and Thin. Notre Dame, London: Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Response to Veit Bader. In: Political Theory 23(2) (1995), pp. 247–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Response. In: Miller, David/Walzer, Michael (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995a, pp. 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, F., Citizenship and the Right to Leave. In: American Political Sscience Review 75(3) (1981), pp. 636–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., The Uneasy Alliance of Group Representation and Deliberative Democracy. In: Kymlicka/Norman (eds.), 2000, pp. 124–152.

  • Williams, M., Citizenship as Identity, Citizenship as Shared Fate, and the Functions of Multicultural Education,” in Kevin McDonough and Walter Feinberg, eds., Citizenship and Education in Liberal-Democratic Societies – Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities} (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 2003, pp. 208–247.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, V. Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism’s Main flaws. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 83–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3292-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3292-6

Key Words

Navigation