Advertisement

Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 103–112 | Cite as

Identity and distinctness in online interaction: encountering a problem for narrative accounts of self

  • Alexander D. Carruth
  • David W. Hill
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the prevalent assumption that when people interact online via proxies—avatars—they encounter each other. Through an exploration of the ontology of users and their avatars we argue that, contrary to the trend within current discussions of interaction online, this cannot be unproblematically assumed. If users could be considered in some sense identical to their avatars, then it would be clear how an encounter with an avatar could ground an encounter with another user. We therefore engage in a systematic investigation of several conceptions of identity, concluding that in none of these senses can users and avatars be identified. We go on to explore how current accounts of identity-as-selfhood online might resolve this problem by appealing to narrativity or authorship, ultimately concluding that as these accounts stand they are unable to provide grounds for the claim that users encounter each other online and so supplementary work is required.

Keywords

Avatar Identity Narrative self Online interaction Ontology 

References

  1. Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2004). Love online: Emotions on the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, M. (1952). The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, 61(242), 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brey, P. (2003). The social ontology of virtual worlds. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62(1), 269–282.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, R. A. (2000). Ethics and cybernetics: Levinasian reflections. Ethics and Information Technology, 2(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. C. (1988). Why everyone is a novelist. Times Literary Supplement (Sept. 16–22), 1016–1022.Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, J. (2012). Virtual worlds and moral evaluation. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hill, D. W. (2013). Avatar ethics: Beyond images and signs. Journal for Cultural Research, 17(1), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillis, K. (2009). Online a lot of the time: Ritual, fetish, sign. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klang, M. (2004). Avatar: From deity to corporate entity: A philosophical inquiry into digital property in online games. Information, Communication & Society, 7(3), 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Lewis, D. (1991). Parts of classes. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Lowe, E. J. (1996). Subjects of experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lowe, E. J. (2002). A survey of metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. MacIntyre, A. (2006). After virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  17. Markham, A. (1998). Life online: Researching real experience in virtual space. Oxford: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  18. McTaggart, J. M. E. (1921). The nature of existence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Merricks, T. (1998). There are no criteria of identity over time. Noûs, 32(1), 106–124.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, E. T. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parsell, M. (2008). Pernicious virtual communities: Identity, polarisation and the Web 2.0. Ethics and Information Technology, 10(1), 41–56.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Ricoeur, P. (1994). Oneself as Another, trans. K. Blamey. London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schechtman, M. (1996). The constitution of selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schechtman, M. (2012). The story of my (Second) life: Virtual worlds and narrative identity. Philosophy and Technology, 25(3), 329–343.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shoemaker, S. (1970). Persons and their pasts. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7(4), 269–285.Google Scholar
  27. Shoemaker, S. (1984). Personal identity: A materialist’s account. In S. Shoemaker & R. Swinburne (Eds.), Personal identity (pp. 67–132). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Shoemaker, D. W. (2010). Self-exposure and exposure of the self: Informational privacy and the presentation of identity. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio, 17(4), 428–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  31. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Van Inwagen, P. (1990). Material beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Van Inwagen, P. (1994). Composition as identity. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolfendale, J. (2007). My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(2), 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  2. 2.Department of Communication and Media, School of the ArtsUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations