Advertisement

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 213–229 | Cite as

Communication of Organizational Strategy and Coordinated Decision Making as Catalysts for Enhanced Perceptions of Corporate Ethical Values in a Financial Services Company

  • Sean Valentine
  • David Hollingworth
Article

Abstract

Drawing upon stakeholder theory and other interactional perspectives, this study explores the linkages among strategy communication, business decisions, and organizational ethics. Using survey data obtained from employees working for a financial services firm operating in the United States, the study determines 1) whether coordinated decision making fully mediates a proposed relationship between the communication of business strategy and employees’ perceptions of corporate ethical values, or 2) whether business strategy communication and coordinated decision making both influence perceived ethical values (partial mediation). Results obtained from structural equation modeling provide strong support for full mediation. The practical/theoretical implications of the findings and future research suggestions are presented.

Keywords

Business strategy Organizational ethics Corporate ethical values 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Lynn Godkin (Lamar University) and Duane Helleloid (University of North Dakota) for their helpful comments on this paper.

References

  1. Adams, J., Tashchian, A., & Shore, T. H. (2001). Codes as signals for ethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2003). The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anh, P. C., & Matsui, Y. (2011). Relationship between quality management information and operational performance. Management Research Review, 34, 519–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansoff, H. I. (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management.’. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur, H. B. (1984). Making business ethics useful. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barney, J. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bates, K. A., Amundson, S. D., Schroeder, R. G., & Morris, W. T. (1995). The crucial interrelationship between manufacturing strategy and organizational culture. Management Science, 41(10), 1565–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromily, P., & Cummings, L. L. (1992). Transactions costs in organizations with trust. Working paper no. 28. Minneapolis: Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2007). Strategic management: A dynamic perspective. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David, F. R. (1989). How companies define their mission. Long Range Planning, 22(1), 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. David, F. R. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and cases (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (1999). Information-processing alternatives for coping with manufacturing environment complexity. Decision Sciences, 30, 1021–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flynn, B. B., & Flynn, E. J. (2004). An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraedrich, J. P., & Ferrell, O. C. (1992). The impact of perceived risk and moral philosophy type on ethical decision making in business organizations. Journal of Business Research, 24, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organizational design, an information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organizational design. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  23. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hosmer, L. T. (1994). Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–402.Google Scholar
  27. Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational justice: a behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunt, S. D., Wood, V., & Chonko, L. (1989). Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2000). Is it ethical to use ethics as strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, T. (1991). Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  33. Koonmee, K., Singhapakdi, A., Virakul, B., & Lee, D. (2010). Ethics institutionalization, quality of work life, and employee job-related outcomes: a survey of human resource managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Research, 63, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Larson, G. S., & Pepper, G. L. (2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: a case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 528–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee, E. M., Park, S., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1716–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lin-Hi, N., & Muller, K. (2013). The CSR bottom line: preventing corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Research, 66, 1928–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maritz, R., Pretorius, M., & Plant, K. (2011). Exploring the interface between strategy-making and responsible leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKnight, D. H., Ahmad, S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2001). When do feedback, incentive control, and autonomy improve morale? The importance of employee-management relationship closeness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 466–482.Google Scholar
  39. Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Darroch, J. (2006). The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Minoja, M. (2012). Stakeholder management theory, firm strategy, and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mintzberg, H. (1990). The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morita, M., & Flynn, E. J. (1997). The linkage among management systems, practices and behaviour in successful manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 17(10), 967–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2005). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  44. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rallapalli, K. C., Vitell, S. J., & Barnes, J. H. (1998). The influence of norms on ethical judgments and intentions: an empirical study of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 43, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robin, D. P., Reidenbach, R. E., & Forrest, P. J. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., Mayer, D. M., Saltz, J. L., & Niles-Jolly, K. (2005). Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1017–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K. A., & Junttila, M. A. (2002). A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwab, B. (1996). A note on ethics and strategy: do good ethics always make for good business? Strategic Management Journal, 17, 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schwepker, C. H., Jr. (2001). Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research, 54, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwepker, C. H., Jr., & Good, D. J. (2007). Sales management’s influence on employment and training in developing an ethical sales force. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(4), 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharma, D., Borna, S., & Stearns, J. M. (2009). An investigation of the effects of corporate ethical values on employee commitment and performance: examining the moderating role of perceived fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sims, R. R. (1991). The institutionalization of organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer, A. E. (1994). Strategy as moral philosophy. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 191–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer, A. E. (2010). Integrating ethics and strategy: a pragmatic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singhapakdi, A. (1999). Perceived importance of ethics and ethical decisions in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 45, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences, and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singhapakdi, A., Salyachivin, S., Virakul, B., & Veerayangkur, V. (2000). Some important factors underlying ethical decision making of managers in Thailand. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(3), 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sorsa, V., Palli, P., & Mikkola, P. (2014). Appropriating the words of strategy in performance appraisal interviews. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thun, J. (2008). Empirical analysis of manufacturing strategy implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trevino, K. T. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interaction model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.Google Scholar
  64. Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2011). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (5th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  65. Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613–624.Google Scholar
  67. Voss, C. A. (1995). Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Voss, C. A. (2005). Paradigms of manufacturing strategy re-visited. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 1223–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wotruba, T. R., Chonko, L. B., & Loe, T. W. (2001). The impact of ethics code familiarity on manager behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of North DakotaGrand ForksUSA

Personalised recommendations