Advertisement

Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 219–232 | Cite as

The Rise and Fall of Autonomous Group Working in the British Coal Mining Industry

  • David Allsop
  • David Wray
Article

Abstract

The group organization of work in the British coal mining industry brought to the workers involved significant levels of autonomy; the ability to define the social relations of work; high levels of control over the labor process; and a strong and lasting commitment - to the group. This autonomy was to survive a series of managerial attacks, in the form of changed payment systems and the introduction of new technologies, and was not finally lost until the imposition of full automation that included surveillance systems that made the labor process transparent.

Key words

Autonomy Control Group work Labor process Mining Social relations of work 

References

  1. Beynon, H., & Austrin, T. (1994). Masters and servants. London: Rivers Oram.Google Scholar
  2. Bullock, J. (1976). Bowers row. Bradford: EP.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, A., Newby, M., & Winterton, J. (1985). The restructuring of the British coal industry. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandler, K. W. (1978). MINOS – A computer system for control at collieries. 2ND. International Conference on Centralised Control Systems, London, quoted in Burns et al. (1985).Google Scholar
  5. Dennis, N., Henriques, F., & Slaughter, C. (1956). Coal is our life. London: Eyre & Spottiswood.Google Scholar
  6. Douglas, D. (1972). Pit life in Co. Durham. History workshop pamphlet. Oxford: Ruskin College.Google Scholar
  7. Fincham, R., & Rhodes, P. S. (1999). Principles of organizational behaviour (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbon, P., & Bromley, S. (1990). From an institution to a business? Changes in the British coal industry, 1985–9. Economy and Society, 19, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handy, L. J. (1981). Wages policy in the British coalmining industry: A study of national wage bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Herbst, P. G. (1962). Autonomous group functioning. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  12. Howell, D. (1989). The Politics of the NUM: A Lancaster view. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. London: Chapman Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Myers, C., & Davids, K. (1991). Knowing and doing: Different dimensions of skill at work. MRC/ESRC Social and Applied Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  15. Penn, R., & Simpson, R. (1986). The development of skilled work in the British coal mining industry, 1870–1985. Industrial Relations Journal, 17, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stephenson, C., & Wray, D. (2005). Cultural regeneration in post-industrial mining communities: the New Herrington miners banner partnership. Capital & Class, 87, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some sociological and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Human Relations, 4, 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trist, E. L., Higgen, G. W., Murray, H., & Pollock, A. B. (1963). Organizational choice. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  19. UK Coal. (2005). Supervisory, control, and data acquisition systems (SCADA) for surface and underground application at deep mines. Framework Document.Google Scholar
  20. Williamson, W. (1982). Class, culture and community. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
  21. Winterton, J. (1981). The trend of strikes in British coal mining, 1949–1979. Industrial Relations Journal, 12, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wood, S. (1990). Tacit skills, the Japanese management model and new technology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wray, D. (2009). The relevance of community unionism: the case of the Durham Miners Association. Labor Studies Journal, 34, 507–518.Google Scholar
  24. Wray, D., & Allsop, D. (2011). Damaged by democracy: the case of the National Union of Mineworkers. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Work and Employment Research Unit, Business SchoolUniversity of HertfordshireHertfordshireUK
  2. 2.Work and Employment Research UnitUniversity of HertfordshireDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations