Skip to main content
Log in

Damaged by Democracy: The National Union of Mineworkers and the 1984–85 Strike

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the democratic tensions within the National Union of Mineworkers that split the union during the 1984–85 strike over mine closures. In seeking to understand the conflict over the failure to hold a national ballot to validate this yearlong strike, the paper explores the development of this federally structured trade union and examines previous conflicts in which the federated nature of the union created local, rather than national, solidarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors of this paper stand in opposition over the issue of the ballot.

  2. Some of these early regional organizations were called “Districts,” others “Associations.” To avoid confusion between the MFGB and the NUM, all pre-NUM regional organizations will be called “Districts.” All regional organizations within the NUM are known as Area Associations.

  3. Both of the authors of this paper voted in Area level ballots.

References

  • Ackers, P. (1996). Life after death: mining history without a coal industry. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations, 1, 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adeney, M., & Lloyd, J. (1986). The miners’ strike 1984–1985: Loss without limit. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, V. L. (1981). The militancy of British miners. Shipley: Moor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsop. D. (2007). Restructuring, management strategies and trade union responses in the privatised UK coal industry: A case of UK Coal. Unpublished PhD Thesis.

  • Annual Report. (1967). National Coal Board.

  • Ashworth, W. (1986). The history of the British coal industry, Vol. 5, 1946–1982. London: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, G. B. (1953). Structural reform in the British Miners’ Union. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67, 576–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, F., & Hencke, D. (2009). Marching to the fault line. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon, H., & Austrin, T. (1994). Masters and servants: Class and patronage in the making of a labour organisation. London: Rivers Oram Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (ed.) (1978). Mining and social change: Durham county in the twenty conference report (1977), National Union of Mineworkers.

  • Crick, M. (1985). Scargill and the miners. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, N., Henriques, F., & Slaughter, C. (1969). Coal is our life: An analysis of a Yorkshire mining community. Oxford: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, B. (1984). Trade unionism in crisis: The miners strike and the challenge to union democracy. In H. Beynon (Ed.), Digging Deeper (pp. 69–85). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gildart, K. (2001). North Wales miners: A fragile unity, 1945–1996. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. R. (1962). The miners in Nottinghamshire, 1914–1944: A History of the Nottinghamshire Miners’ Unions. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. R. (1985). County under siege: Nottinghamshire in the miners’ strike 1984–5. Ashbourne: Moorland Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, J. (1982). Battered cherub: The autobiography of Joe Gormley. London: Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy, L. J. (1981). Wages policy in the British coal-mining industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, W. W. (1953). Nationalisation in practice: The British coal industry. London: Bailey Bros and Swinfen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, M. (1944). Britain’s coal. London: Victor Gollance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. (1989). The politics of the NUM: A Lancashire view. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, J. (1984). Undermining capitalism: State ownership and the dialectic of control in the British coal mining industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. R. (1961). The miners in crisis and war. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. R. (1979). The miners, one union, one industry: A history of the National Union of Mineworkers. London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. (1979). The world on our backs. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. J. (1996). Miners on strike: Class solidarity and division in Britain. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, W. H., & Davis, J. L. (1957). Introducing a new wage structure into the coal mining industry. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 19, 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, K. (2010). Nottingham miners do strike! Nottingham: Nottinghamshire Miners Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, C., & Wray, D. (2005). Emotional regeneration through community action in post-industrial mining communities: The New Herrington miners’ banner partnership. Capital and Class, 87, 175–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, B. (1982). Class, culture and community: A biographical study in social change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterton, J., & Winterton, R. (1989). Coal, crisis and conflict: The miners’ strike in Yorkshire. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, D. (2009). The relevance of community unionism: the case of the Durham Miners Association. Labor Studies Journal, 34, 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Wray.

Appendix: Extracts from the NUM rulebook as of 1st March 1984

Appendix: Extracts from the NUM rulebook as of 1st March 1984

Rule 8: The government of the Union shall be by Conference as provided for in these Rules. In the periods between Conference the NEC shall administer the business and affairs of the union and perform all duties laid down for it by resolution of Conference, and shall not at any time act contrary to, or in defiance of, any resolution of Conference.

Rule 23: The Conference of Delegates (Conference) in which the authority and government of the union shall be vested, shall function in Annual Conference or Special Conference. The Annual Conference shall be held between the 1st June and 31st July in each year, or such other times as Conference may resolve. The duties of the Annual Conference shall be to transact the business of the Union and to discuss matters affecting the welfare of the membership; to consider resolutions submitted to the Annual Conference by the National Executive Committee and Areas; to receive the National Executive Committee’s report of its proceedings and the financial and Auditor’s report for the previous

Rule 41: Strikes and Lockouts. In the event of a dispute arising in any Area or applying to the workers in any Branch likely or possible to lead to a stoppage of work or any other industrial action short of a strike the questions involved must immediately be reported by the appropriate official of the Area in question to the National Executive Committee which shall deal with the matter forthwith, and in no case shall cessation of work or other form of industrial action short of strike take place by the workers without the previous sanction of the National Executive Committee, or of a Committee(whether consisting of members of the National Executive Committee or other persons) to whom the National Executive Committee may have delegated the power of giving such sanction, either generally or in a particular case and no funds of the Union shall be applied in strike pay or other trades dispute benefit for the benefit of the workers who shall have ceased work without the previous sanction of the National Executive Committee.

Rule 43: National Action. In the event of national action being proposed by the union in pursuance of any of the objectives of the union, the following provision shall apply: That a national strike shall only be entered upon as the result of a ballot vote of the members taken in pursuance of a resolution of a Conference, and a strike shall not be declared unless 55 per cent of those voting in the ballot vote in favour of such a strike. If a ballot vote be taken during the time a strike is in progress, a vote of 55 per cent of those taking part in the ballot shall be necessary to continue the strike. If a ballot vote be taken during the time of a stoppage is in progress, such stoppage may not be continued unless 55 per cent of those voting in the ballot vote in favour of continuance.

(The words ‘55 per cent’ were replaced by the words ‘simple majority’ at the Special Conference on 19th April 1984).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wray, D., Allsop, D. Damaged by Democracy: The National Union of Mineworkers and the 1984–85 Strike. Employ Respons Rights J 23, 147–161 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-011-9173-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-011-9173-3

Key words

Navigation