Late Payments and Leery Applicants: Credit Checks as a Selection Test



The use of pre-employment credit checks has grown dramatically in the U.S. in recent years, but there has been almost no research on their validity from a selection standpoint and none on how applicants respond to them. We examine the use of credit checks as a selection test, reviewing evidence for their validity and legal considerations. The theoretical part of the article highlights how credit checks are distinct in key respects from more commonly studied selection tests and how they are likely to violate many applicants’ expectations of privacy and procedural justice. The empirical section presents the results of a study of business undergraduates. Consistent with hypotheses, results indicate negative reactions to the use of credit reports in hiring, moderated by job and individual characteristics, and substantial misunderstanding of what credit reports contain. Implications for practice are discussed.

Key words

selection privacy attitudes organizational justice credit history 



We would like to thank John Cullen and Charles Funk for assistance with subject recruitment.


  1. Arnoldy, B. (2007). The spread of the credit check as civil rights issue. Christian Science Monitor, January 18, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Arvey, R. D., & Sackett, P. R. (1993). Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In N. Schmitt, & W. Borman (Eds.) Personnel selection (pp. 171–202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Avery, R. B., Calem, P. S., & Canner, G. B. (2004). Credit accuracy and access to credit. Federal Reserve Bulletin, Summer 2004.Google Scholar
  4. Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54, 387–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wieman, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadrain, D. (2004). HR professionals stymied by vanishing job references. HRMagazine, Nov. 2004, p.31–32.Google Scholar
  7. Cassady, A., & Mierzwinski, B. (2004). Mistakes do happen: A look at credit report errors. Washington, D. C.: National Association of State PIRGs.Google Scholar
  8. Cat Le, P. (2007). Bill would ban employers’ access to credit report. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, February 17, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2004). An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: a construct-oriented approach. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, D., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conkey, C. (2005). Increasingly, employers, others check your ranking: do you really need that store card? Wall Street Journal, 19, B1 Nov.Google Scholar
  12. Connerley, M. L., Arvey, R. D., Gilliland, S. W., Mael, F. A., Paetzold, R. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). Selection in the workplace: whose rights prevail? Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Consumer Federation of America (2007). Consumer understanding of credit scores remains poor. Retrieved from on July 30, 2007.
  14. Consumer Reports (2006). Caution! The secret score behind your auto insurance. August, 2006.Google Scholar
  15. Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1989). A model of employee responses to drug testing programs. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23, 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eastman, W. (1997). Overestimating oneself and overlooking the law: psychological supports for employment-at-will. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EEOC (2007). Equal Employment Opportunity Commission meeting of May 16, 2007. Transcript available at
  18. Experián (2007). Employment insight. Retrieved from on July 20, 2007.
  19. Federal Trade Commission (2007). Credit-based insurance scores: Impacts on consumers of automobile insurance. Retrieved from P044804FACTA_Report_Credit-Based_Insurance_Scores.pdf., July 23
  20. Flahardy, C. (2005). Applicants cry foul over employment credit checks. InsideCounsel, January 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Fuchsberg, G. (1990). More employers check credit histories of job seekers to judge their character. Wall Street Journal, 30, B1 May.Google Scholar
  22. Gallagher, K. (2006). Rethinking the Fair Credit Reporting Act: when requesting credit reports for “employment purposes” goes too far. Iowa Law Review, 91, 1593.Google Scholar
  23. Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: an organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 18, 694–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, M. M., Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2003). Privacy and attitudes toward Internet-based selection systems: a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11, 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hart, M. (2005). Subjective decisionmaking and unconscious discrimination. Alabama Law Review, 56, 741–789.Google Scholar
  27. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: an updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Himmelstein, D., Thorne, D., Warren, E., & Woolhandler, S. (2005). Illness and injury as contributors to bankruptcy. Health Affairs, W5, 63–73.Google Scholar
  29. Hollinger, R. C., & Langton, L. (2006). 2005 National Retail Security Survey final report. University of Florida.Google Scholar
  30. Holtz, B. C., Ployhart, R. E., & Dominguez, A. (2005). Testing the rules of justice: the effects of frame-of-reference and pre-test validity information on personality test responses and test perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Horvath, M., Ryan, A. M., & Stierwalt, S. (2000). Explanations for selection test use, outcome favorability and self-efficacy: what influences test-taker perceptions? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 310–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, J., & Garman, E. T. (2004). Financial stress, pay satisfaction, and workplace performance. Compensation and Benefits Review, 36, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, D. (2006). Less-than-clean credit history may just cost you a job offer. The Boston Globe, September 11.Google Scholar
  34. Mael, F. (1998). Privacy and personnel selection: reciprocal rights and responsibilities. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 11, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oppler, E. S., Lyons, B. D., Ricks, D. A., & Oppler, S. H. (2004). The relationship between financial history and counterproductive work behavior. Presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, J. K., & Koppes, L. L. (2004). Investigation of credit history validity at predicting performance and turnover. Presented at Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar
  37. Pennigton-Cross, A. (2003). Credit history and the performance of prime and non-prime mortgages. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 27, 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reid, L. D., Murphy, K. R., & Reynolds, H. D. (1990). Drug abuse and drug testing in the workplace. In K. R. Murphy, & F. E. Saul (Eds.) Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Roscigno, V. J., Garcia, L. M., & Bobbitt-Zeher, D. (2007). Social closure and processes of race/sex employment discrimination. Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609, 16–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosse, J. G., Miller, J. L., & Stecher, M. D. (1994). A field study of job applicants’ reactions to personality and cognitive ability testing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 987–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosse, J. G., Miller, J. L., & Ringer, R. C. (1996). The deterrent value of drug and integrity testing. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 477–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicant perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: a critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26, 565–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rynes, S., & Connerley, M. L. (1993). Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schleicher, D. J., Venkataramani, V., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2006). So you didn’t get the job… now what do you think? Examining opportunity-to-perform fairness perceptions. Personnel Psychology, 59, 559–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Society for Human Resource Management (2003). SHRM Workplace Violence Survey.Google Scholar
  47. Society for Human Resource Management (2004). SHRM Reference and Background Checking Survey.Google Scholar
  48. Smith, A. (2007). Unnecessary credit checks challenged. HRMagazine, May 2007, 22–24.Google Scholar
  49. Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., Millsap, R. E., & Pearlman, K. S. (1993). Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stone, E. F., & Stone, D. L. (1990). Privacy in organizations: Theoretical issues, research findings, and protection strategies. In G. R. Ferris, & K. M. Rowland (Eds.) Research in personnel and human resources management (vol. vol. 8, (pp. 349–411)). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  51. Stone-Romero, E. F., Stone, D. L., & Hyatt, D. (2003). Personnel selection procedures and invasion of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 343–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations