Advertisement

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 53–72 | Cite as

Institutional image indicators of three Universities: basis for attracting prospective entrants

  • Rex P. Bringula
  • Roselle S. Basa
Article

Abstract

This study determined the student profile and enrollment of the three Universities in the University Belt. It also found out the respondents’ level of consideration concerning the institutional image indicators that served as basis for attracting prospective entrants. Descriptive statistics revealed the following: most of the respondents belonged to families with five members and lived in family-owned houses in the cities of Manila and Quezon; most of the respondents were taking up Medicine-related courses; most of FEU and UE respondents belonged to less-than-Php 30,000-monthly family income bracket, while UST respondents belonged to greater-than-Php 100,000-monthly family income; and UST had the most number of respondents with family members studying in the same school. A Geographical Information System-generated map also showed that there were more respondents from Marikina than from the nearby municipality of San Juan. For non-Metro Manila settlers, most of the respondents were from the provinces of CALABARZON (Region 4-A) or Central Luzon (Region 3). The three sets of respondents considered five indicators but had different levels of considerations in six indicators. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that five out of six indicators were found to have a significant difference in the level of consideration. Further comparison was utilized through the use of Tukey-HSD. Thus, the hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference in the level of consideration of the respondents from the three Universities regarding institutional-image indicators is partially upheld.

Keywords

Attrition Enrollment GIS School choice University choice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson D., Barrow L., Sander W. (2007) Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics 25(1): 95–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballestamon S. U., Narvasa B. L., Cabasal M. P., Gonda B. A., Prado M. E. G. (2000) The Filipino’s commitment to quality education. Journal of Southeast Asian Education 1(1): 163–184Google Scholar
  3. Bauch P. A., Goldring E. B. (1995) Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17(1): 1–21Google Scholar
  4. Bechley L. A. (2007) Finding space and managing distance: Public school choice in an urban California district. Urban Studies 44(7): 1355–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belfield C. R. (2004) Modeling school choice: A comparison of public, private-independent, private-religious and home-schooled students. Education Policy Analysis Archives 12(30): 1–18Google Scholar
  6. Berry J (1998) Choosing a library school. Library Journal 123(9): 36–39Google Scholar
  7. Bosetti L. (2004) Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy 19(4): 387–405. doi: 10.1080/0268093042000227465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boyd D., Lankford H., Loeb S., Rockoff J., Wyckoff J. (2008) The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(4): 793–818. doi: 10.1002/pam.20377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer P., Carnes L. (2008) The perceived impact of physical facilities on the student learning environment. Business Education Digest 17: 3–21Google Scholar
  10. Briggs S., Wilson A. (2007) Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 29(1): 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown J., Izhar O. (2006) Universities in a competitive global marketplace: A systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing. International Journal of Public Sector Management 19(4): 316–338. doi: 10.1108/09513550610669176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgess S., Propper C., Wilson D. (2007) The impact of school choice in England. Policy Studies 28(2): 129–143. doi: 10.1080/01442870701309064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman R.G. (1986) Toward a theory of college selection: A model of college search and choice behavior. Advances in Consumer Research 13(1): 246–250Google Scholar
  14. Chumacera, M. F. D. R. (1999). The marketing strategy for San Pablo Colleges. Unpublished master’s thesis. Manila: Philippine Women’s University.Google Scholar
  15. Clark J. S., Apostolopoulou A., Branvold S., Synowka D. (2009) Who knows Bobby Mo? Using intercollegiate athletics to build a university brand. Sport Marketing Quarterly 18: 57–73Google Scholar
  16. Crosling G., Heagney M., Thomas L. (2009) Improving student retention in higher education: Improving teaching and learning. Australian Universities Review 51(2): 9–18Google Scholar
  17. Davis K. (2003) The financial side of choosing a college. Kiplinger’s Financing College 1: 187–207Google Scholar
  18. De Guzman A.B., Torres J.R. (2004) The University of Santo Tomas viewed from the lens of Total Quality Management: Implications to total quality education. Asia Pacific Education Review 5(1): 88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Guzman A. B., De Castro B. V., Aquino K. A. B., Buenaventura M. A. R., Duque A. N. C., Enriquez M. L. D. R. (2008) Filipino parents’ school choice and loyalty: A factor analysis. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 7(2): 109–122. doi: 10.1007/s10671-007-9037-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobni D., Zinkhan G. M. (1990) In search of brand image: A foundation analysis. Advances in Consumer Research 17(1): 110–119Google Scholar
  21. Dosch M. P., Jarvis S., Schlosser K. (2008) Attrition in nurse anesthesia educational programs as reported by program directors: The class of 2005. AANA Journal 76(4): 277–281Google Scholar
  22. Earthman, G. I. (2000). The impact of school building conditions, student achievement, and behavior. In The appraisals of investment in educational facilities (pp. 181–194) Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Elacqua G., Schneider M., Buckley J. (2006) School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom?. Journal of Policy Analysis Management 25(3): 577–601. doi: 10.1002/pam.20192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliot K. M., Shin D. (2002) Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy Management 24(2): 197–209. doi: 10.1080/1360080022000013518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Epoc F. J. (2008) Tuition fee increment and quality of education of selected private secondary schools in Metro Manila. Luz y Saber 2(1): 61–70Google Scholar
  26. Esguerra J. S., Quirimit A. E., Valdez R. M., Villacrusis M. X. R. (2008) Attrition in selected colleges of the University of Baguio. University of Baguio Research Journal 22(2): 53–67Google Scholar
  27. Espero V. P. (2005) Shifting college affiliations: Their “pull” and “push” background in the Luzon Colleges. Vibrant 3(1): 13–28Google Scholar
  28. Fossey R. (1994) Open enrollment in Massachusetts: Why families choose. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16(3): 320–334Google Scholar
  29. Fund for Assistance to Private Education (FAPE): (1991) Philippine educational indicators. The fund for assistance to private education (Vol. 1). FAPE, Makati PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  30. Gallego F. A., Hernando A. E. (2008) On the determinants and implications of school choice: Semi-structural simulations for Chile. Economia 9(1): 197–229Google Scholar
  31. George D., Mallery P. (2009) SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 16.0 update 9th edn. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Gill T.K., Gill S.S. (2000) Financial management of universities in developing countries. Higher Education Policy 13(2): 125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guolla M. (2001) Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory Practice 7(3): 87–96Google Scholar
  34. Hagel P., Shaw R. (2008) The influence of delivery mode on consumer choice of university. European Advances in Consumer Research 8: 531–536Google Scholar
  35. Helgesen O., Nesset E. (2007) Images, satisfaction, and antecedents: Drivers of student loyalty? A case study of a Norwegian University College. Corporate Reputation Review 10: 38–59. doi: 10.157/palgrave.crr.1550037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hussain F., Hanim S., Fernando Y., Nejati M. (2009) Education service delivery and students’ satisfaction: A study of private colleges in Malaysia. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal 1(1): 64–72Google Scholar
  37. Kuo Y.-K., Ye K.-D. (2009) The causal relationship between service quality, corporate image and adults’ learning satisfaction and loyalty: A study of professional programmes in a Taiwanese vocational institute. Total Quality Management 20(7): 749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewison D. M., Hawes J. M. (2007) Student target marketing strategies for universities. Journal of College Admission 196: 14–19Google Scholar
  39. Lockwood, R. C., Hadd, J. (2007). Building a brand in higher education: Why business practices—particularly brand strategies—are becoming essential in today’s universities. Gallup Management Journal, 1–6.Google Scholar
  40. Longden B. (2006) An institutional response to change student expectations and their impact on retention rates. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 23(2): 173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lopez A. S. (2004) RP education in bad shape. BizNews Asia 2(22): 19–22Google Scholar
  42. Mai L.-W. (2005) A comparative study between UK and US: Student satisfaction in higher education and its influential factors. Journal of Marketing Management 21: 859–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. National School Climate Council. (2007). The school climate challenge: Narrowing the gap between school climate research and school climate policy. Practice guidelines and teacher education policy. www.ecs.org/school-climate.
  44. Nadiri H., Kandampully J., Hussain K. (2009) Students’ perceptions of service quality in higher education. Total Quality Management 20(5): 523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nguyen N., LeBlanc G. (2001) Image and reputation of higher education institutions in students’ retention decisions. The International Journal of Educational Management 15(6): 303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Novak J. (2006) Choice matters: What needs to change to make schools competitive?. Policy 22(1): 23–28Google Scholar
  47. Oplatka I. (2009) Marketing the university: The subjective perception of Israeli academics of their role in attracting new students to their institution. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31(3): 207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007). Financing higher education. In OECD economic surveys: United States (pp. 125–155). Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. Palacio A. B., Meneses G. D., Perez Perez P. J. (2002) The configuration of the university image and its relationships with the satisfaction of student. Journal of Educational Administration 40(5): 486–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pallant J. (2001) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows version 10. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  51. Parker R. S., Cook S., Pettijohn C. E. (2007) School choice attributes: Positioning a private school. Services Marketing Quarterly 28(4): 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paulsen M. B., St. John E. P. (2002) Social class and college costs. The Journal of Higher Education 73(2): 189–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pimpa N., Suwannapirom S. (2008) Thai students’ choices of vocational education: Marketing factors and reference groups. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 7(2): 99–107. doi: 10.1007/s10671-007-9035-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pop M. D., Bacila M. F., Moisescu O. I., Tirca A. M. (2008) The impact of educational experience on students’ satisfaction in the Romanian higher education system. International Journal of Business Research 8(4): 131–137Google Scholar
  55. Rhodes C., Nevill A. (2004) Academic and social integration in higher education: A survey of satisfaction and dissatisfaction within a first-year education studies cohort at a new university. Journal of Further and Higher Education 28(2): 179–193. doi: 10.1080/0309877042000206741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roberts J., Styron R. Jr. (2010) Student satisfaction and persistence: Factors vital to student retention. Research in Higher Education Journal 6: 1–18Google Scholar
  57. Rohrs H. (1998) A “good school” in the progressive sense. Education 57: 60–79Google Scholar
  58. Romeo J. R. M. (1992) Management and financing of higher education in Brazil. Higher Education Policy 5(2): 23–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salmi J. (1992) Perspectives on the financing of higher education. Higher Education Policy 5(2): 13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santiago A., Largoza G., Conchada M. I. (2007) What does it cost a university to educate one student?. International Journal of Education Leadership 2(2): 1–11Google Scholar
  61. Singell L., Stater M. (2006) Going, going, gone: The effects of aid policies on graduation at three large public institutions. Policy Sciences 39: 379–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Srikantanyoo N., Gnoth J. (2005) Quality dimensions in international tertiary education: A Thai prospective students’ perspective. The Quality Management Journal 12(1): 30–40Google Scholar
  63. Stanley R. E., French P. E. (2009) Evaluating increased enrollment levels in institutions of higher education: A look at merit-based scholarship programs. Public Administration Quarterly 33(1): 4–36Google Scholar
  64. Stevens R. E., McConkey C. W., Coles H. S., Clow K. E. (2008) College image: A strategic marketing dilemma. Services Marketing Quarterly 29(3): 99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Strauss L. C., Volkwein J. F. (2004) Predictors of student commitment at two-year and four-year institutions. The Journal of Higher Education 75(2): 203–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swinetorn E. N. (1991) Philippine higher education: Toward the twenty-first century. Praeger Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  67. Tatar E., Oktay M. (2006) Search, choice and persistence for higher education: A case study in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2: 115–129Google Scholar
  68. Thomas D. J. (1995) Education and the role of the university in economically developing regions. Higher Education Policy 8(2): 51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tsolidis G. (2009) University fodder: Understanding the place of select entry and high performing government schools. Australian Universities Review 51(2): 4–8Google Scholar
  70. Wang Z. (2007) Key factors that influence recruiting Chinese students. International Education Journal 8(2): 37–48Google Scholar
  71. Yabut M. C. P. E. V. (2008) The predictors of college enrollment determined through the use of multiple regression and econometric analysis: Basis of proposed appropriate forecasting models. Graduate and Faculty Studies: Contribution to Education-Science-Culture 50(1): 110–114Google Scholar
  72. Yang S.-U., Alessandri S. W., Kinsey D. F. (2008) An integrative analysis of reputation and relational quality: A study of university-student strong sports program relationships. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 18(2): 145–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yukselturk E., Inan F. A. (2006) Examining the factors affecting student dropout in an online certificate program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 7(3): 76–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Computer Studies and SystemsUniversity of the East-ManilaManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations