Getting our best teachers into disadvantaged schools: differences in the professional and personal factors attracting more effective and less effective teachers to a school
- 237 Downloads
Of the school-level factors that have an impact on student learning, one of the most powerful appears to be the effectiveness of the individual teacher. The most effective teachers are, therefore, one of the most important tools schools and systems have at their disposal to lift the achievement of socio-economically disadvantaged students and improve equity, and policy must be designed in such a way as to draw more of them to the most disadvantaged educational settings. To do this, systems and schools need to be aware of differences in the priorities more and less effective teachers hold in deciding where to teach. This study highlighted such differences in a large sample of Australian teachers. The most effective teachers placed considerably more importance on professional factors in determining whether to transfer into a school. Implications for staffing policy are discussed.
KeywordsSchool staffing Teacher mobility Effective teachers
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allinder R. M. (1994) The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education 17: 86–95Google Scholar
- Anderson R., Greene M., Loewen P. (1988) Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research 34(2): 148–165Google Scholar
- Ashton P. T., Webb R. B. (1986) Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Boe, E. E., Barkanic, G., & Leow, C. (1999). Retention and attrition of teachers at the school level: National trends and predictions. Data analysis report no: 1999-DAR1. Washington, DC: National Institute on Educational Governance, Finance, Policymaking and Management.Google Scholar
- Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. National Bureau for Economic research working paper no. 14022. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14022.
- Chidolue, M. E. (1996). The relationship between teacher characteristics, learning environment and student achievement and attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22(3), 263–274.Google Scholar
- Darling-Hammond L. (2000) Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand and standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring and qualified teacher for every child. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Department for Education and Schools (DfES). (2003). Department of Councillors Brief. http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/la/CF.POLICY_BRIEF_2003.pdf.
- Glass, G. (1990). Using student test scores to evaluate teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 229–239). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Goldhaber, D., Gross, B., & Player, D. (2007). Are public schools really losing their best? Assessing the career transitions of teachers and the implications for the quality of the teaching workforce. National Center for analysis of longitudinal data in educational research working paper number 12. http://www.caldercenter.org/PDF/1001115_Public_Schools.pdf.
- Hanushek, E., Kain, J., & Rivkin, S. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 7082. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7082.pdf.
- Hanushek, E., Kain, J., O’Brien, D., & Rivkin, S. (2005). The market for teacher quality. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 11154. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11154.
- Ingersoll, R. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- James R., Wyn J., Baldwin G., Hepworth G., McInnis C., Stephanou A. (2002) Rural and isolated school students and their higher education choices: A re-examination of student location, socioeconomic background, and educational advantage and disadvantage. National Board of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Leigh, A. (2007). Estimating teacher effectiveness from two-year changes in students’ test scores. Available at http://econrsss.anu.edu.au/~aleigh/pdf/TQPanel.pdf.
- Marzano P. (2003) What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
- Ministerial Council on Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs. (2003). Demand and Supply of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in Australia. Available at http://www.mceetya.edu.au/public/demand.htm.
- Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175.Google Scholar
- Murnane, R., Singer, J., Willett, J., Kemple, J., & Olsen, R. (1991). Who will teach? Policies that matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Needels, M. C. (1991). Comparison of student, first-year, and experienced teachers’ interpretations of a first-grade lesson. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(3), 269–278.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2003). Beyond rhetoric: Adult learning policy and practices. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: (2005) Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Author, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2009). International adult literacy and basic skills surveys in the OECD region. Working Paper No. 26. Paris: Author. Available at http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/oeceduaab/26-en.htm.
- Peart N., Campbell F. (1999) At-risk students’ perceptions of teacher effectiveness. Journal for a Just and Caring Education 5(3): 269–284Google Scholar
- Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
- Smithers A., Robinson P. (2004) Teacher turnover, wastage and destinations. Centre for Education and Employment Research, University of Buckingham, Buckingham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
- Smithers, A., & Robinson, P. (2005). Teacher turnover, wastage and movements between schools. Buckingham, England: Centre for Education and Employment Research, University of Buckingham. DfES research report 640.Google Scholar
- Stronge J. H. (2007) Qualities of effective teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VAGoogle Scholar
- Teese, R. (2006). Condemned to innovate. Griffith Review, Autumn. http://www3.griffith.edu.au/01/griffithreview/past_editions.php?id=301.
- Teese, R. and Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Carlton, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
- Tye B., O’Brien L. (2002) Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession?. Phi Delta Kappan 84(1): 24–32Google Scholar
- Victorian Department of Education and Training (2004). Teacher supply and demand report 2004. Available at http://www.teaching.vic.gov.au/pdfs/Teacher%20Supply%20and%20Demand%20in%20Victoria%202004.pdf
- Victorian Institute of Teaching (2006). Annual Report 2005–2006. http://www.vit.vic.edu.au/files/documents/1061_VITAnnReportWeb.pdf.
- Vila, L. (2005). The outcomes of investment in education and people’s well-being. European Journal of Education, 40(1).Google Scholar
- Watson, A., & Hatton, N. (2002). School staffing: Linking quality with equality. Submission RTTE20 to the Australian Review of Teaching and Teacher Education. http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/1F0A28BE-C252-4FFD-AFC2-6D3C079677BA/1751/RTTE20.pdf.