On the Epistemology of the Precautionary Principle
- 504 Downloads
In this paper we present two distinctly epistemological puzzles that arise for one who aspires to defend some plausible version of the precautionary principle. The first puzzle involves an application of contextualism in epistemology; and the second puzzle concerns the task of defending a plausible version of the precautionary principle that would not be invalidated by de minimis.
KeywordsEpistemic State Precautionary Principle Knowledge Attribution Contextualist Approach Epistemic Standard
- Ashford, N. A. (2007). The legacy of the precautionary principle in US law: The rise of cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment as undermining factors in health, safety and environmental protection. Implementing the precautionary principle. approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Bodansky, D. (1992). Scientific uncertainty and the precautionary principle: Commentary: The precautionary principle. Environment, 34, 4–5.Google Scholar
- Charnley, G. (1999). President’s message. RISK Newsletter, 19, 2.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S. (2004). Contextualism defended. In Steup and Sosa (pp. 56–62).Google Scholar
- DeRose, K. (1992). Contextualism and knowledge attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 913–929.Google Scholar
- DeRose, K. (1999). Contextualism: An explanation and defense. The Blackwell guide to epistemology, 187–205.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. S., & Brewers, J. M. (1996). Towards a Scientific Definition of the Precautionary Principle. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 32(11), 768.Google Scholar
- Harris, J., & Holm, S. (1999). Precautionary principle stifles discovery. Nature, 400, 398.Google Scholar
- Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Levi, I. (1990). Hard choices: Decision making under unresolved conflict. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Montague, P. (2008). The precautionary principle in the real world. Environmental Research Foundation. January 21.Google Scholar
- Morris, J. (2000). Defining the precautionary principle. In Morris, ed. Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, Woburn, Mass.: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Munthe, C. (2011). The price of precaution and the ethics of risk (Vol. 6). Springer.Google Scholar
- Nollkaemper, P. A. (1996). What you risk reveals what you value, and other dilemma’s in the legal assault on risk. The precautionary principle and international law: The challenge of implementation, 31, 73–94.Google Scholar
- Stanley, J. (2005). Knowledge and practical interests. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- The San Francisco Precaution Ordinance (2002). http://www.sehn.org/rtfdocs/SF_ordinance.doc. Accessed 17 Feb 2014)
- UN General Assembly (1992). Rio declaration on environment and development. Agenda, 21.Google Scholar
- United Kingdom Interdepartmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment (UK-ILGRA). (2002). http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/meetings/committees/ilgra/pppa.pdf.
- Vancouver Statement on the Globalization and the Industrialization of Agriculture. (1998). http://www.ifg.org/IFA/The_Vancouver_Statement.htm.
- Whipple, C. G. (1987). De minimis risk: Contemporary issues in risk analysis, vol 2. Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wingspread Statement on the Precautionary Principle (1998) http://www.sehn.org/wing.html.