We present a new argument for the claim that in the Sleeping Beauty problem, the probability that the coin comes up heads is 1/3. Our argument depends on a principle for the updating of probabilities that we call ‘generalized conditionalization’, and on a species of generalized conditionalization we call ‘synchronic conditionalization on old information’. We set forth a rationale for the legitimacy of generalized conditionalization, and we explain why our new argument for thirdism is immune to two attacks that Pust (Synthese 160:97–101, 2008) has leveled at other arguments for thirdism.
Preliminary Probability Generalize Conditionalization Epistemic Situation Epistemic Probability Principal Principle
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Arntzenius, F. (2003). Some problems for conditionalization and reflection. Journal of Philosophy,100, 356–370.Google Scholar
Barnes, E. C. (1999). The quantitative problem of old evidence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,50, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar