Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach
- 245 Downloads
In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as “inferential prostheses” (instruments for surrogative reasoning) construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure (also analysed in inferential terms). The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to correct and improve our models. This provides us with an argument against Sugden’s account of credible models: the likelihood or realisticness (their “credibility”) is not always a good measure of their acceptability. As opposed to “credibility” we propose the notion of “enlightening”, which is the capacity of giving us understanding in the sense of an inferential ability.
KeywordsActual World Thought Experiment Scientific Model Inferential Norm Inferential Role
- Atkinson, D. (2003). Experiments and thought experiments in natural science. In M. C. Galavotti (Ed.), Observation and experiment in the natural and social sciences (pp. 209–225). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Boumans, M. (1999). Built-in justification. In M. S. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 66–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bueno, O., & Colyvan, M. An inferential conception of the application of mathematics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
- Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, N. (2009). If no capacities then no credible worlds. But can models reveal capacities? Erkenntnis, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s10670-008-9136-8.
- Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2009). Learning from minimal economic models. Erkenntnis, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s10670-008-9138-6.
- Ibarra, A., & Mormann, Th. (1998). Datos, fenómenos y constructos teóricos—Un enfoque representacional. Theoria, 31, 61–87.Google Scholar
- Ibarra, A., & Mormann, Th. (2006). Scientific theories as intervening representations. Theoria, 55, 21–38.Google Scholar
- Jones, M. R. (2005). Idealization and abstraction: A framework. In M. R. Jones & N. Cartwright (Eds.), Idealization XII: Correcting the model. Poznań studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 86, pp. 173–217). New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Laymon, R. (1982). Scientific realism and the hierarchical counterfactual path from data to theory. In P. Asquith & T. Nickles (Eds.), PSA 1982 (Vol. 1, pp. 107–121). East Lansing: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Mäki, U. (1994). Isolation, idealization and truth in economics. In B. Hamminga & N. B. De Marchi (Eds.), Idealization VI: Idealization in economics (pp. 147–168). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Morgan, M. (1999). Learning from models. In M. Morgan & M. S. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators (pp. 347–388). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Morgan, M., & Morrison, M. S. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances: The structure of the objective world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought experiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Strevens, M. Why explanations lie: Idealization in explanation (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Sugden, R. (2002). Credible worlds: The status of theoretical models in economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sugden, R. (2009). Credible worlds, capacities and mechanisms. Erkenntnis, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s10670-008-9134-x.
- Suppe, F. (1989). The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, M. (2007). Three kinds of idealization. Journal of Philosophy, 104, 12.Google Scholar
- Ylikoski, P. (2008). The illusion of depth of understanding in science. In De Regt, Sabinelly, & Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding: Philosophical perspectives. Pittsburg: Pittsburg University Press.Google Scholar