Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 512–523 | Cite as

Chemical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of Garhwal Himalaya, India

  • Sumeet Gairola
  • C. M. Sharma
  • S. K. Ghildiyal
  • Sarvesh Suyal
Article

Abstract

The present study was undertaken in moist temperate forest of Mandal-Chopta area in the Garhwal region of Uttarakhand, India. The aim of the present study was to assess the chemical properties of soils in relation to the forest structure and composition. Twelve forest types according to the altitude, slope aspect, and species composition were selected for the study. Chemical properties of the soil, i.e., total nitrogen (N), available phosphorus (P), available potassium (K), organic carbon (C), soil organic matter (SOM), pH and C:N ratios were analyzed for three different depths viz., (i) ‘Upper’ (0–10 cm), (ii) ‘Middle’ (11–30 cm), and (iii) ‘Lower’ (31–60 cm) in all the selected forest types. Phytosociological and diversity parameters viz. total basal cover (Gha−1), stem density (Nha−1), tree species richness (SR), Simpson concentration of dominance and Shannon–Wiener diversity index (\( \overline{\rm H} \)) were also calculated for each forest type. Values of N, P, K, C, SOM, C:N ratio and pH ranged from 0.17 to 0.45 %, 2.73 to 20.17 ppm, 40.67 to 261.17 ppm, 2.29 to 4.31 %, 3.95 to 7.43 %, 8.12 to 14.49 and 5.47 to 6.67, respectively. N showed a positive relationship with C and K. P was positively correlated with C and negatively correlated with altitude. P was higher in the soil of lower horizons of all the forest types. K was found to be positively correlated with altitude, C and N. pH of all the forest types was slightly acidic. C was comparatively higher in mixed broad-leaved forest types. No relationship between altitude and C was observed, which may be due to different composition of forest types along the altitudinal gradient and their differential decomposition rates. C content decreased with the depth of the soil. C showed positive correlation with N, P, and K. N showed a positive correlation with Gha−1. K showed a negative correlation with SR and \( \overline{\rm H} \). P showed no relationship with the phytosociological parameters. This study also provides the comparisons between the results of chemical analysis of the present study with numerous other previous studies in the temperate Himalayan region of the Uttarakhand. The values of soil chemical properties of the present study in most of the forest types are on the higher end than the values previously recorded for the other similar forests of the region. The possible reason being luxuriant vegetation and undisturbed nature of these forest types, which is evident from higher values of diversity and other phytosociological parameters.

Keywords

Carbon Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium Tree density Tree diversity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thankfully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, New Delhi, vide its Project No. SP/SO/PS-52/2004. We also thank Uttarakhand Forest Department for providing meteorological data, and CSWCRTI, Dehradun, India, for help in the soil analysis. One of the authors, Sumeet Gairola, is thankful to University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India, for providing financial support under Dr. D.S Kothari Postdoctoral Fellowship.

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM (1991) Terrestrial ecosystems. Saunders College Publishing, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams PW, Sidle RC (1987) Soil conditions in three recent landslides in southeast Alaska. For Ecol Manag 18(2):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkely D, Rothe A (2002) Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci 59(3):233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basumatary A, Bordoloi PK (1992) Forms of potassium in some soils of Assam in relation to soil properties. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 40(3):443–446Google Scholar
  5. Binkely D (1995) The influence of tree species on forest soils: processes and patterns. In: Mead DJ, Cornforth IS (eds) Proceedings of the trees and soil workshop, Lincoln University, agronomy society of New Zealand special publications number 10. Lincoln University Press, Canterbury, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  6. Binkley D, Giardina C (1998) Why do species affect soils? The warp and woof of tree-soil interaction. Biogeochemistry 42(1–2):89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boruah HC, Nath AK (1992) Potassium status in three major soil orders of Assam. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 40(3):559–561Google Scholar
  8. Brady NC (1996) The nature and properties of soil, 10th edn. Prentice Hall, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen total. In: Miller RH, Kieney DR (eds) Method of soil analysis- part 2: chemical and microbiological methods, 2nd edn. Agronomy series No. 9. American Society for Agronomy and Soil Sciences, Madison, pp 595–624Google Scholar
  10. Brown S, Anderson JM, Woomer PL, Swift MJ, Barrios E (1994) Soil biological processes in tropical ecosystems. In: Woomer PL, Swift MJ (eds) The biological management of tropical soil fertility. Wiley, Chichester, pp 15–46Google Scholar
  11. Cote L, Brown S, Pare D, Fyles J, Bauhus J (2000) Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood. Soil Biol Biochem 32(8–9):1079–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31(3):434–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Hann S (1977) Humus, its formation, its relation with the mineral part of the soil and its significance for soil productivity. In: Organic matter studies, vol 1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 21–30Google Scholar
  14. Dimri BM, Jha MN, Gupta MK (1997) Status of soil nitrogen at different altitudes in Garhwal Himalaya. Van Vigyan 359(2):77–84Google Scholar
  15. Dimri BM, Jha MN, Gupta MK (2006) Soil potassium changes at different altitudes and seasons in upper Yamuna Forests of Garhwal Himalayas. Indian For 132(5):609–614Google Scholar
  16. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Aber JD, Boron JS, Bormann BJ, Johnson DW, Lenly AD, McNulty SG, Ryan DF, Stottlemeyer R (1998) Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses and management strategies. Ecol Appl 8(3):706–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher RF, Binkley D (2000) Ecology and management of forest soils, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 489Google Scholar
  18. Gairola S, Sharma CM, Rana CS, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2010) Phytodiversity (angiosperms and gymnosperms) in Mandal-Chopta forest of Garhwal Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Nat Sci 8(1):1–17Google Scholar
  19. Gairola S, Sharma CM, Suyal S, Ghildiyal SK (2011a) Composition and diversity of five major forest types in moist temperate climate of the western Himalayas. For Stud China 13(2):139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gairola S, Sharma CM, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2011b) Live tree biomass and carbon variation along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya (India). Curr Sci 100(12):1862–1870Google Scholar
  21. Gairola S, Sharma CM, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2012) Regeneration dynamics of dominant tree species along an altitudinal gradient in a moist temperate valley slopes of the Garhwal Himalaya. J For Res 23(1):53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta MK, Sharma SD (2008) Effect of tree plantation on soil properties, profile morphology and productivity index I. Poplar in Uttarakhand. Ann For 16(2):209–224Google Scholar
  23. Hogberg NM (2004) Carbon and nitrogen relations among soils, microbes and plants in boreal forests. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  24. Jha MN, Dimri BM (1991) Soil nutrients and forest productivity in four natural stands. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 39:735–738Google Scholar
  25. Jha MN, Rathore RK, Pande P (1984) Soil factor affecting the natural regeneration of silver fir and spruce in Himachal Pradesh. Indian For 110(3):293–298Google Scholar
  26. Johnson DW, Ball JT (1996) Interactions between CO2 and nitrogen in forests: can we extrapolate from the seedling to the stand level? In: Koch GW, Mooney HA (eds) Carbon dioxide and terrestrial ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, p 443Google Scholar
  27. Kawahara T, Tsutsuni T (1972) Studies on the circulation of Carbon and Nitrogen in forest ecosystem. Bull Kyoto Univ For 44:141–158Google Scholar
  28. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis. Belhaven Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kharkwal G (2002) Spatial pattern of plant species diversity with particular reference to forest herbs along an altitudinal transect in Central Himalaya. PhD Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, Uttarakhand, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Khera N, Kumar A, Ram J, Tewari A (2001) Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid-elevational forest of Central Himalaya, India. Trop Ecol 42(1):83–95Google Scholar
  31. Kumar M, Rajwar GS, Sharma CM (2004) Physico-Chemical properties of forest soils along altitudinal gradient in the Garhwal Himalayas. J Hill Res 17(2):60–64Google Scholar
  32. Leskiw LA (1998) Land capability classification for forest ecosystem in the oil stands region. Alberia Environmental Protection, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller C (2001) Understanding the carbon-nitrogen ratio. Reprinted from ACRES. A voice for Eco-agriculture 30(4):20Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell HL, Chandler RF (1939) The nitrogen nutrition and growth of certain deciduous trees of Northeastern United States. The Blackrock Forest Bulletin no. 11. Cornwall-on-the-Hudson, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Morwin HD, Peach PM (1951) Exchangeability of soil potassium in and, silt and clay fractions as influenced by the nature of complementary exchangeable cations. Proc Soil Sci Soc Am 15:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy HP (1958) The fertility status of some soils of Ethiopia. College of Agriculture, JimmaGoogle Scholar
  37. Nazir T (2009) Estimation of site quality of important temperate forest cover on the basis of soil nutrient and growing stock in Garhwal Himalaya. D.Phil. Thesis, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal), Uttarakhand, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with Sodium bicarbonate. Department of Agriculture Circular, US, p 939Google Scholar
  39. Pande PK, Negi JDS, Sharma SC (2001) Plant species diversity and vegetation analysis in moist temperate Himalayan forest. Indian J For 24(4):456–470Google Scholar
  40. Pande PK, Negi JDS, Sharma SC (2002) Plant species diversity, composition, gradient analysis and regeneration behaviour of some tree species in a moist temperate western Himalayan forest ecosystem. Indian For 128(8):869–886Google Scholar
  41. Pandit BR, Thampan S (1988) Total concentration of P, Ca, Mg, N & C in the soils of reserve forest near Bhavnagar (Gujarat State). Indian J For 11(2):98–100Google Scholar
  42. Paul EA, Clark FE (1996) Soil microbiology and biochemistry, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  43. Phillips EA (1959) Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt, New York, p 107Google Scholar
  44. Powers JS, Schlessinger WH (2002) Relationships among soil carbon distributions and biophysical factors at nested spatial scales in rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Geoderma 109:165–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prakash R (1986) Forest management. International Book Distributors, Dehradun, p 214Google Scholar
  46. Rawal RS (1991) Woody vegetation analysis along an elevational gradient (1600-3400 m) of upper Sarju catchment, Kumaun Himalaya. PhD Thesis, Kumaun University, Naini Tal, Uttarakhand, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson GP, Vitousek PM (1981) Nitrification in primary and secondary succession. Ecology 62:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Semwal S (2006) Studies on phytosociology, diversity patterns and competition along an altitudinal gradient in a part of lesser Himalaya in Garhwal, Uttaranchal. D.Phil. Thesis, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal), Uttarakhand, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  49. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, p 117Google Scholar
  50. Sharma CM, Baduni NP (2000) Effect of aspects on the structure of some natural stands of Abies pindrow in Himalayan moist temperate forest. Environmentalist 20(4):309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharma CM, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2009) Forest dependent livelihood in relation to socio-economic status of the people in temperate villages of Garhwal Himalaya: a case study. Mt Res Dev 29(4):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharma CM, Suyal S, Ghildiyal SK, Gairola S (2010a) Role of Physiographic factors in distribution of Abies pindrow (Silver Fir) along an altitudinal gradient in Himalayan temperate Forests. Environmentalist 30(1):76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharma CM, Baduni NP, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2010b) Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India. For Ecol Manag 260(12):2170–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sharma CM, Baduni NP, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2010c) The effect of slope aspects on forest compositions, community structures and soil properties in natural temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya. J For Res 21(3):331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharma CM, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2010d) Physical properties of soils in relation to forest composition in moist temperate valley slopes of the Central Western Himalaya. J For Sci 26(2):117–129Google Scholar
  56. Sharma CM, Gairola S, Baduni NP, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2011) Variation in carbon stocks on different slope aspects in seven major forest types of temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Biosci 36(4):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharpe WE, Swistock BR, Dewalle DR (1992) A greenhouse study of northern red oak seedling growth of two forest soils at different stages of acidification. Water Air Soil Pollut 66(1–2):121–133Google Scholar
  58. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singh AK, Parsad A, Singh B (1986) Availability of phosphorus and potassium and its relationship with physico-chemical properties of some forest soils of Pali-range (Shahodol, M.P.). Indian For 112(12):1094–1104Google Scholar
  60. Soromessa T, Teketay D, Demissew S (2004) Ecological study of the vegetation in Gamo Gofa zone, southern Ethiopia. Trop Ecol 45(2):209–221Google Scholar
  61. Srivastava RK, Khanduri VP, Sharma CM, Kumar P (2005) Structure, diversity and regeneration potential of oak-dominant conifer mixed forest along an altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian For 131(12):1537–1553Google Scholar
  62. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Thadani R, Ashton PMS (1995) Regeneration of Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) in the central Himalaya. For Ecol Manag 78:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tomlinson GH, Tomlinson FL (1990) Effects of acid deposition on the forests of Europe and North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 281Google Scholar
  65. Ulrich B (1971) The ecological value of soil chemical data. In: Duvigneaud P (ed) Productivity of forest ecosystems. UNESCO, Paris, pp 101–105Google Scholar
  66. Usman S, Singh SP, Rawat YS, Bargali SS (2000) Fine root decomposition and nitrogen mineralisation patterns in Quercus leucotrichophora and Pinus roxburghii forests in Central Himalaya. For Ecol Manag 131:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walkley A (1947) An estimation of methods for determining organic carbon and nitrogen in soils. J Agric Sci 25:598–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilde SA (1946) Forest soils and forest growth. Publishers Periodical Experts Book AgencyGoogle Scholar
  69. Woomer PL, Martin A, Albrecht A, Reseck DVS, Scharpenseel HW (1994) The importance and management of soil organic matter in the tropics. In: Woomer PL, Swift MJ (eds) The biological management of tropical soil fertility. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  70. Yano Y, McDowell WH, Aber JD (2000) Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon in forest soil solution and effects of chronic nitrogen deposition. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1743–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumeet Gairola
    • 1
  • C. M. Sharma
    • 2
  • S. K. Ghildiyal
    • 2
  • Sarvesh Suyal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of BotanyHNB Garhwal UniversitySrinagar, GarhwalIndia

Personalised recommendations