Skip to main content
Log in

Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation

  • Published:
The Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This is the second paper of two companion papers presenting the results of laboratory bench-scale experimental studies on electrokinetic extraction of lead from two different kaolinites. The theoretical formulation and numerical simulation of the process are presented in the first paper. Two different kaolinites were used in the study: (1) Georgia kaolinite and (2) Milwhite kaolinite. The lead spiked in Georgia kaolinite was highly mobilized and effectively extracted by the technique as the pH in the soil was significantly lowered by the electrokinetic process. Milwhite kaolinite has a much higher acid/base buffer capacity, and the required acidic environment could not be developed. As a result, removal of the lead spiked in Milwhite kaolinite was minimal. Comparison between simulations and experimental results is also presented. Factors affecting the cleanup efficiency of the process and potential enhancement techniques are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acar YB, Gale RJ, Putnam GA, Hamed J, Wong RL (1990) Electrochemical processing of soils: Theory of pH gradient development by diffusion, migration, and linear convection. J Environ Sci Health Part A—Environ Sci Eng Toxic Hazard Subst Control 25(6):687–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Acar YB, Li H, Gale RJ (1992) Phenol removal from kaolinite by electrokinetics. ASCE J Geotech Eng 118(11):1837–1852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Horng JI, Ferguson JF (1991) Field experience with electrokinetics at a superfund site. In: Energy and environmental issues. Transp Res Rec 1312, Transp Res Board, Washington, DC, pp 167–174

  • Bruell CJ, Segall BA, Walsh MT (1992) Electroosmotic removal of gasoline hydrocarbons and TCE from clay. ASCE J Environ Eng 118(1):68–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox CD, Shoesmith MA, Ghosh MM (1996) Electrokinetic remediation of mercury-contaminated soils using iodine/iodide lixiviant. Environ Sci Technol 30(6):1933–1938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis WD, Fogg TR, Tafuri AN (1986) Treatment of soils contaminated with metals. In: Proceedings of 12th Annual Research Symposium: Land disposal, remedial action, incineration and treatment of hazardous waste, Report no. EPA/600/S9-86/022, US EPA, Cincinnati, pp 201–207

  • Eykholt GR, Daniel DE (1994) Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soil. ASCE J Geotech Eng 120(5):797–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath S (1994) A laboratory study of electro-kinetic remediation of fine-grained soil contaminated with organic compounds. MS Thesis, Texas A&M University

  • Gu Y-Y, Yeung AT, Li H-J (2009a) EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of cadmium from a natural clay of high buffer capacity. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Geoenvironmental Engineering (ISGE 2009), Hangzhou, pp 790–795

  • Gu Y-Y, Yeung AT, Koenig A, Li H (2009b) Effects of chelating agents on the zeta potential of cadmium-contaminated natural clay. Sep Sci Technol 44(10):2203–2222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamed J, Acar YB, Gale RJ (1991) Pb(II) removal from kaolinite using electrokinetics. ASCE J Geotech Eng 117(2):241–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho SV, Athmer C, Sheridan PW, Hughes BM, Orth R, Mckenzie D, Brodsky PH, Shapiro A, Thornton R, Salvo J, Schultz D, Landis R, Griffith R, Shoemaker S (1999a) The Lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation. 1. Small field test. Environ Sci Technol 33(7):1086–1091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho SV, Athmer C, Sheridan PW, Hughes BM, Orth R, Mckenzie D, Brodsky PH, Shapiro AM, Sivavec TM, Salvo J, Schultz D, Landis R, Griffith R, Shoemaker S (1999b) The Lasagna technology for in situ soil remediation. 2. Large field test. Environ Sci Technol 33(7):1092–1099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lageman R, Godschalk MS (2007) Electro-bioreclamation—A combination of in situ remediation techniques proves successful at a site in Zeist, the Netherlands. Electrochim Acta 52(10):3449–3453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lageman R, Clarke RL, Pool W (2005) Electro-reclamation, a versatile soil remediation solution. Eng Geol 77(3–4):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HH, Yang JW (2000) A new method to control electrolytes pH by circulation system in electrokinetic soil remediation. J Hazard Mater 77(1–3):227–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leinz RW, Hoover DB, Meier AL (1998) NEOCHIM: an electrochemical method for environmental application. J Geochem Explor 64(1–3):421–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maini G, Sharman AK, Knowles CJ, Sunderland G, Jackman SA (2000) Electrokinetic remediation of metals and organics from historically contaminated soil. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75(8):657–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menon RM (1996) Numerical modeling and experimental study on electro-kinetic extraction. Dissertation, Texas A&M University

  • Pamukcu S, Wittle JK (1992) Electrokinetic removal of selected heavy metals from soil. AIChE Environ Prog 11(3):241–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Probstein RF, Hicks RE (1993) Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Sci 260(5107):498–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Chaparro C, Saichek RE (2003) Iodide-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mercury-contaminated soils. ASCE J Environ Eng 129(12):1137–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rødsand T, Acar YB, Breedveld G (1995) Electrokinetic extraction of lead from spiked Norwegian marine clay. In: Acar YB, Daniel DE (eds) Characterization, containment, remediation, and performance in environmental geotechnics. Geotech Spec Publ No 46, vol 2. ASCE, New York, pp 1518–1534

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawada A, Tanaka S, Fukushima M, Tatsumi K (2003) Electrokinetic remediation of clayey soils containing copper(II)-oxinate using humic acid as a surfactant. J Hazard Mater 96(2–3):145–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AP, Probstein RF (1993) Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by electroosmosis. Environ Sci Technol 27(2):283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suèr P, Allard B (2003) Mercury transport and speciation during electrokinetic soil remediation. Water Air Soil Pollut 143(1–4):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Olphen H (1977) An introduction to clay colloid chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Olphen H, Fripiat JJ (eds) (1979) Data summaries—Clay minerals society. In: Data handbook for clay materials and other non-metallic minerals. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 13–37

  • Yang GCC, Long Y-W (1999) Removal and degradation of phenol in a saturated flow by in situ electrokinetic remediation and Fenton-like process. J Hazard Mater 69(3):259–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (1992) Diffuse double-layer equations in SI units. ASCE J Geotech Eng 118(12):2000–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (1994) Electrokinetic flow processes in porous media and their applications. In: Corapcioglu MY (ed) Advances in porous media, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 309–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (2006a) Contaminant extractability by electrokinetics. Environ Eng Sci 23(1):202–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (2006b) Fundamental aspects of prolonged electrokinetic flows in kaolinites. Geomech and Geoeng: An Int J 1(1):13–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (2008) Electrokinetics for soil remediation. In: Yeung AT, Lo IMC (eds) Environmental geotechnology and global sustainable development 2008. Advanced Technovation Ltd, Hong Kong, pp 16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT (2009a) Remediation technologies for contaminated sites. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geoenvironmental Engineering (ISGE 2009), Hangzhou, pp 328–369

  • Yeung AT (2009b) Geochemical processes affecting electrochemical remediation. In: Reddy K, Cameselle C (eds) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Wiley, New York, pp 65–94

  • Yeung AT, Datla S (1995) Fundamental formulation of electrokinetic extraction of contaminants from soil. Can Geotech J 32(4):569–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT, Hsu C (2005) Electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated clay. ASCE J Environ Eng 131(2):298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM (1996) EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of lead. ASCE J Geotech Eng 122(8):666–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM (1997a) Physicochemical soil-contaminant interactions during electrokinetic extraction. J Hazard Mater 55(1–3):221–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung AT, Scott TB, Gopinath S, Menon RM, Hsu C (1997b) Design, fabrication, and assembly of an apparatus for electrokinetic remediation studies. ASTM Geotech Test J 20(2):199–210

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert T. Yeung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hsu, Cn., Yeung, A.T. & Menon, R.M. Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation. Environmentalist 31, 33–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1

Keywords

Navigation