By means of environmental education, teachers are supposed to intervene in pupils’ awareness and concern of environmental issues. Teachers’ environmental attitudes, however, have rarely been studied. We analysed 367 German pre- and in-service teachers’ environmental attitudes for their structure and socio-economic correlates within the frame of a European project. Thus, we retrieved for adults the two-dimensional model of ecological values (2-MEV) presented for adolescents by Bogner and Wiseman (Sci Educ Int 15(1):27–48, 2004). For the two domains, Preservation and Utilisation, the psychometric structure was confirmed and discriminative correlations with age, gender and teaching subject were unveiled. Further research is needed to deduce the implications for teaching practice.
Environmental attitudes E. values Environmental perception Teachers Student teachers Gender Age 2-MEV model
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Blaikie NWH (1992) The nature and origins of ecological world views: an Australian study. Soc Sci Quart 73(1):144–165Google Scholar
Blocker TJ, Eckberg DL (1989) Environmental issues as women’s issues: general concerns and local hazards. Soc Sci Quart 70(3):586–593Google Scholar
Bogner FX (1998) Environmental perception of Irish and Bavarian adolescents. A comparative empirical study. Environmentalist 18:27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogner FX (2000) Adolescent environmental perception of Italian and five European non-Mediterranean pupil populations. Fresen Environ Bull 9:570–581Google Scholar
Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1997a) Environmental perception of rural and urban pupils. Development of an attitude and behaviour scale. J Environ Psychol 17:111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1997b) Environmental perspectives of Danish and Bavarian pupils: towards a methodological framework. Scand J Educ Res 41(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogner FX, Wiseman M (1998) Environmental perception of Swiss and Bavarian pupils: an empirical evaluation. Schweizer Zeitschrift für Soziologie/Swiss J Sociol 24(3):547–566Google Scholar