Advertisement

The Environmentalist

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 315–317 | Cite as

Reaching a forest land per capita milestone in the United States

  • C. W. Woodall
  • P. D. Miles
Article

Abstract

During April 2007, forest land per capita in the United States dropped below 1 ha. This is the result of a rather static area of forest land in the United States for the past 100 years combined with population growth. The US now joins the ranks of most countries (77%) having forest land per capita below 1 ha. The combination of an increasing human population with stable or increasing per capita natural resource utilization may place even more demand on resources derived from forest land in the future. The forest land per capita should be expected to continue its downward trend unless substantive demographic, resource utilization, and land-use changes occur.

Keywords

Forest land area Sustainability Population growth United States 

References

  1. Allen CD, Breshears DD (1998) Drought-induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotone: Rapid landscape response to climate variation. Ecology 95(25):14839–14842Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez M (2007) The state of America’s forests. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (eds) (2005) Forest inventory and analysis national sample design and estimation procedures. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Report. SRS-GTR–80Google Scholar
  4. Dietz T, Rosa EA, York R (2007) Driving the human ecological footprint. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. FAO (2006) Global forest resources assessment, 2005. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Forestry Paper, 147. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Frayer WE, Furnival GM (1999) Forest survey sampling designs, a history. Journal of Forestry 97(12):4–10Google Scholar
  7. Giampietro M, Ulgiatti S, Pimentel D (1997) Feasibility of large-scale biofuel production. Bioscience 47:587–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hobbs F, Stoops, N (2002) Demographic trends in the 20th century. US Census Bureau, Census 200 Special Reports, Series CENSR-4. US GPO. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Howard JL (2001) US timber production, trade consumption, and price statistics 1965 to 1999. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-595. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI. p 90Google Scholar
  10. Kellogg RS (1909) The timber supply of the United States. For. Resourc. Circ. 166. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. p 24Google Scholar
  11. Mann CC (2005) 1491: new revelations of the Americas before Columbus. Random House Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Sampson N, DeCoster L (2000) Forest fragmentation: implications for sustainable private forests. Journal of Forestry 98(3):4–8Google Scholar
  13. Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-241. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  14. US Census Bureau (2004) US interim projections by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj/. 18 March 2004
  15. US Census Bureau (2006) Nation’s Population to Reach 300 Million on Oct. 17. Press Release, CB06–156. Washington, DC 12 October 2006Google Scholar
  16. US Census Bureau (2007) US population clock. http://www.census.gov/. 27 April 2007
  17. US Department of Energy (2006) Annual energy review 2005. DOE/EIA-0384Google Scholar
  18. Woodall CW, Perry CH, Miles PD (2006) The relative density of forests in the United States. For Ecol Manage 226(2006):368–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA Forest Service, Northern Research StationForest Inventory and Analysis ProgramSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations