Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index: multivariate analysis of indicators with an application to selected states and National Capital Territory (NCT) of India

Abstract

There is an increasing demand for quantifying, evaluating and reporting sustainability of transportation systems, especially in case of developing countries. However, sustainable transportation being a complicated area of concern is becoming equally challenging. In this concern, the quantification of the sustainable transportation attainment levels covering three pillars of sustainability (i.e., Environmental, Social and Economical) is useful. The main aim of this paper is to develop a model which can quantify and report the attainment levels of sustainable transportation and which is flexible, robust, comprehensive as well as transferable. In this line, a five-stage model is presented which produces a composite index called Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA). Using ISTA, transportation system of various zones can be evaluated, compared and tracked. The shortlisting and finalizing of optimum number of zones and sustainable transportation indicators (STIs), in this study, were done by a proposed tool called Bargain Matrix. STIs were broadly classified into three sustainability pillars which were further divided into ten subdivisions. This study used a total of 116 STIs, which were normalized using rescaling method, weighted and aggregated using principal component analysis/factor analysis. The proposed five-stage model was applied to 26 states and National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi, India (i.e., a total of 27 zones). Based on the computed ISTA, while Tamil Nadu (0.6002), Telangana (0.5613) and Andhra Pradesh (0.5580) showed “Best Relative Transport Sustainability Attainment,” Goa (0.3852) and Chhattisgarh (0.4278) showed “Weakest Relative Transport Sustainability Attainment.”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. 1.

    Andra Pradesh was divided into two separate states: Andhra Pradesh and Telangana in the year 2014.

References

  1. Ahangari, H., Garrick, N. W., & Atkinson-Palombo, C. (2016). Relationship between human capital and transportation sustainability for the United States and selected European countries. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2598(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.3141/2598-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso, A., Monzón, A., & Cascajo, R. (2015). Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecological Indicators, 48, 578–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balachandra, P., & Reddy, B. S. (2013). Benchmarking Bangalore City for sustainability—An indicator-based approach. Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP). Bangalore, India. https://cistup.iisc.ac.in/CiSTUP_Website/pages/research/completed.php.

  4. Black, W. R. (2002). Sustainable TRANSPORT AND POTENTIAL MOBILIty. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2(3/4), 179–195.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo, H., & Pitfield, D. E. (2010). ELASTIC—A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators. Transportation Research Part D, 15(4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CENSUS. (2011). Census of India: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner., Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. https://censusindia.gov.in/. Accessed 16 August 2018.

  7. Cornet, Y., & Gudmundsson, H. (2015). Building a metaframework for sustainable transport indicators: Review of selected contributions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2531, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.3141/2531-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costa, P. B., Neto, G. C. M., & Bertolde, A. I. (2017). Urban Mobility Indexes: A Brief Review of the Literature. In World Conference on Transport Research—WCTR 2016 (Vol. 25, pp. 3645–3655). Shanghai, China: Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.330.

  9. CPCB. (2016). Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. Government of India. https://cpcb.nic.in/. Accessed 23 July 2018.

  10. Danielis, R., Rotaris, L., & Monte, A. (2018). Composite indicators of sustainable urban mobility: Estimating the rankings’ frequency distribution combining multiple methodologies. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(5), 380–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1377789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Datanet-India. (2016). Datanet India, Governemnet of India. https://datanetindia.com/aboutus.html. Accessed 16 August 2018.

  12. De Gruyter, C., Currie, G., & Rose, G. (2017). Sustainability measures of urban public transport in cities: A world review and focus on the Asia/Middle East Region. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment (No. 2003/16). OECD Publishing, Paris. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/405566708255.

  14. Gan, X., Fernandez, I. C., Guo, J., Wilson, M., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., et al. (2017). When to use what: Methods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 81(June), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gudmundsson, H., Hall, R. P., Marsden, G., & Zietsman, J. (2016). Sustainable transportation: Indicators, frameworks and performance management (First.). Springer Texts in Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46924-8.

  16. Gudmundsson, H., & Regmi, M. B. (2017). Developing the Sustainable Urban Transport Index. Transport and communications bulletin for Asia and the Pacific (Vol. 87). Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/publications/bulletin87_Fulltext.pdf#page=43.

  17. Gwilliam, K. (2003). Urban transport in developing countries. Transport Reviews, 23(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144164032000068939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haghshenas, H., & Vaziri, M. (2012). Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Husain, N., Abdullah, M., & Kuman, S. (2002). Evaluating public sector efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA): A case study in Road Transport Department, Selangor Malaysia. Total Quality Management, 11(4–6), 830–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120050008282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Illahi, U. (2018). Transport planning and traffic safety: Making cities, roads, and vehicles safer. Transport Reviews, 39(6), 819–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1552632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Illahi, U., & Mir, M. S. (2019). Sustainable transportation: Indicators, frameworks, and performance management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 73, 224–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. India-Maps. (2016). Maps of India, Government of India Portal. https://www.mapsofindia.com/. Accessed 7 July 2019.

  23. Indian-Railways. (2016). Ministry of Indian Railways, Government of India. https://www.indianrailways.gov.in/. Accessed 16 June 2018.

  24. Jeon, C. M., & Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing Sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:1(31).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeon, C. M., Amekudzi, A. A., & Guensler, R. L. (2013). Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performance measures and indexes. Transport Policy, 25, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jollands, N., Lermit, J., & Patterson, M. (2003). The usefulness of aggregate indicators in policy making and evaluation : A discussion with application to eco-efficiency indicators in New Zealand (pp. 1–39). ANU Research Publications (April). https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41033.

  27. Joumard, R., & Gudmundsson, H. (2010). Indicators of Environmental Sustainability in Transport: An interdisciplinary approach to methods. INRETS. https://cost356.inrets.fr/pub/reference/reports/Indicators_EST_May_2010.pdf.

  28. Litman, T. (2007). Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/2017-02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahdinia, I., & Habibian, M. (2017). Evaluating the transportation system performance based on efficiency, effectiveness and efficacy: A case study of the U.S. States. In Transportation Research Board 96th Annual Meeting. Washington DC, United States: Transportation Research Board (TRB). https://trid.trb.org/view/1439634.

  30. Mahdinia, I., Habibian, M., Hatamzadeh, Y., & Gudmundsson, H. (2018). An indicator-based algorithm to measure transportation sustainability: A case study of the U.S. states. Ecological Indicators, 89, 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. MoCA. (2016). Ministry of Civil Aviation, Governement of India. https://www.civilaviation.gov.in/. Accessed 25 May 2018.

  32. MoP&NG. (2016). Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. https://petroleum.nic.in/. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  33. MORTH. (2016). Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Government of India. https://morth.nic.in/. Accessed 2 September 2018.

  34. MoSPI. (2016). Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/. Accessed 16 May 2018.

  35. MoT. (2016). Ministry of Tourism, Government of India. https://tourism.gov.in/. Accessed 5 July 2018.

  36. NHAI. (2016). National Highways Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India. https://www.nhai.org/. Accessed 25 May 2018.

  37. OECD. (2008). Handbook of Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user guide. JRC European Commission.

  38. OGDP-India. (2016). Open Government Data Platform India. https://data.gov.in/. Accessed 11 June 2018.

  39. Ramani, T. L., Quadrifoglio, L., & Zietsman, J. (2010). Accounting for nonlinearity in the MCDM approach for a transportation planning application. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(4), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2037743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rassafi, A. A., & Vaziri, M. (2005). Sustainable transport indicators: Definition and integration. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Reisi, M., Aye, L., Rajabifard, A., & Ngo, T. (2014). Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecological Indicators, 43(August), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Weighting methods, seminar on composite indicators: From theory to practice. Ispra.

  43. Shaker, R. R., & Sirodoev, I. G. (2016). Assessing sustainable development across Moldova using household and property composition indicators. Habitat International, 55, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shaker, R. R. (2018). A mega-index for the Americas and its underlying sustainable development correlations. Ecological Indicators, 89, 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. SHAKTI. (2016). SHAKTI Sustainable Energy Foundation, India. https://shaktifoundation.in/. Accessed 10 July 2018.

  46. Shiau, T. A., & Liu, J. S. (2013). Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies. Ecological Indicators, 34, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (2004). Evaluating urban sustainability using land-use transport interaction models. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 4(3), 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tanguay, G. A., Rajaonson, J., Lefebvre, J.-F., & Lanoie, P. (2010). Measuring the sustainability of cities: An analysis of the use of local indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. TERM. (2011). TERM 2011: transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe (No. 7/2011). EEA Report: Laying the foundations for greener transport. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.2800/82592.

  50. Ting, K., & Xiao, W. U. (2009). Transportation and Sustainable Development. In International conference on transportation engineering (pp. 2638–2643). Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China: ASCE.

  51. Varzaneh, M. R. (2014). Quantifying transport sustainability: Development of an index. University of Melbourne, Australia. The University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11343/40789.

  52. Verma, A., Rahul, T. M., & Dixit, M. (2015). Sustainability impact assessment of transportation policies—A case study for Bangalore city. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2014.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. WSDOT. (2011). The Gray Notebook (GNB 43) (No. 43). Washington State Department of Transportation (Vol. November 1). Washington D.C., United States. www.wsdot.wa.gov/accountability.

  54. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2007). A mathematical programming approach to constructing composite indicators. Ecological Economics, 62(2), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zito, P., & Salvo, G. (2011). Toward an urban transport sustainability index: An European comparison. European Transport Research Review, 3(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-011-0059-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank and acknowledge the Transportation Engineering and Planning (TE&P) Division, institute administration and Civil Engineering Department at National Institute of Technology (NIT) Srinagar for providing the necessary facilities and support for this research.

Funding

This paper presents part of the research work carried out by the author*, who receives Doctoral Fellowship from the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ubaid Illahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15.

Table 7 Missing values Bargain Matrix of Environmental STIs
Table 8 Missing values Bargain Matrix of Social STIs
Table 9 Missing values Bargain Matrix of Economical STIs
Table 10 Normalized values (NV) of sustainable transportation indicators (STIs) for the state of Andhra Pradesh
Table 11 Computation of Tertiary Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA″) of Pillar-I: Environment for the state of Andhra Pradesh
Table 12 Computation of Tertiary Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA″) of Pillar-II: Social for the state of Andhra Pradesh
Table 13 Computation of Tertiary Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA″) of Pillar-III: Economical for the state of Andhra Pradesh
Table 14 Computation of Secondary Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA″) of three Pillars of sustainability for the state of Andhra Pradesh
Table 15 Computation of Primary Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index (ISTA) for the state of Andhra Pradesh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Illahi, U., Mir, M.S. Sustainable Transportation Attainment Index: multivariate analysis of indicators with an application to selected states and National Capital Territory (NCT) of India. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 3578–3622 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00734-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sustainable transportation
  • Indicator sets
  • Frameworks
  • Principal component analysis
  • Factor analysis
  • Composite index