Assessment of the environmental quality of neighbourhoods in the context of sustainable development: case of the Plain West in Annaba, Algeria

Abstract

This work is a part of the current issues related to environment and sustainable urban development concerns. It focuses on the assessment of the environmental quality of a residential neighbourhood of Plain West in Algeria by a shared diagnosis method for sustainable development “HQDIL” and the indicator repository “INDI”, whose objective is to contribute to a better performance, and improve the environmental quality in the neighbourhoods of emerging countries. This assessment targets four main parameters, namely energy, water, mobility, and landscape and visual quality. The analysis results indicate that the major problems observed in the neighbourhood are primarily related to these parameters. Specific measures and actions are conducted in order to master the current situation of the neighbourhood, such as improving energy and water resources management, and promoting alternative and sustainable modes of urban mobility, by the use of decision support tools. The application of a holistic method that includes both subjective and objective aspects is necessary to determine the advantages and the dysfunctions of neighbourhoods. These can lead stakeholders to better understand their projects. Nevertheless, some limitations are observed concerning the values of references which are not adapted to the local context. That makes it indisputable to establish an evaluation referential for Algeria, and involve a sustainable urban development policy and collaboration between all the people concerned, encouraging participation and communication, and improving legislative texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. 1.

    Involvement of all relevant actors of the neighbourhood (inhabitants, users, managers, elected officials, technicians…) in a process of participation and communication, by establishing a common language on a possible situation.

  2. 2.

    Economic efficiency, social equity, environmental efficiency, long term principle, principle of globality, and governance.

  3. 3.

    This study focuses on four main targets: Energy, Water, Landscape and Visual Quality, and Mobility.

  4. 4.

    This field includes building and space housing, facilities and services and the different industrial and tertiary activities with economic, industrial, or commercial vocation.

  5. 5.

    This element includes all the parts of the neighbourhood which are not built even if they are not really natural such as public spaces, green spaces, landscaped and all the natural areas, these spaces are separate from housing and their private green spaces. They are essentially public open spaces.

  6. 6.

    The INDI model is a simple assessment tool developed from the ISDIS system of sustainable development indicators.

  7. 7.

    In this paper, the choice was made on the Plain West neighbourhoods because it provides a breadth of data and reliable information.

  8. 8.

    Study carried out by the Office of Studies of MILA, Algeria, was charged by the development of the land occupation plan (P.O.S.) Plain West, 2004.

  9. 9.

    According to Patera and Cristeab (2016), numerous functional definitions of sustainability have been analysed by many authors. Based on an analysis, critical conclusions sustainability is generally correlated with the concept of “sustainable development” and cover its environment, economy and social aspects, which led to the overuse of the term, to vagueness and a strong ambiguity.

  10. 10.

    These benchmark values and these functions were dealt and validated by the HQE²R working group on the basis of a study initiated by Catherine Charlot-Valdieu (CSTB) and Philippe Outrequin (La Calade).

  11. 11.

    Worldwide, there are hundreds of sustainable building rating and certification systems that are designed for different types of projects. These systems include performance evaluation, energy systems design, life-cycle assessment, life-cycle costing, indoor environmental quality assessments, and more. The current era of rating tools commenced in 1990 with the introduction of the BREEAM (Building Research Establishment’s Environmental Assessment Method) developed in the UK in 1990, followed by the French system, HQE (High Environmental Quality)—1996, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design)—USA 1998, CASBEE (Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency)—Japan, 2001…, etc. The cost of the certification is established from a marking scheme taking into account the characteristics of project.

  12. 12.

    A survey carried out in 2017 by authors, on the perception of the environmental quality of the living environment by population (a representative sample with several themes). Questions regarding energy management question the vigilance of users towards the use of artificial lighting, appliances and office equipment (reflex to extinguish when it is not necessary) and the adopted measures of saving energy.

  13. 13.

    Rainwater harvesting is the process of collecting rainwater from an impervious surface and directing it to a location where it shall be used or stored for later use.

  14. 14.

    A permeable pavement (also called porous or pervious) is a paving material which allows water to infiltrate and be conveyed through its material matrix, open joints or voids.

Abbreviations

EUREQUA:

Multidisciplinary Assessment and Environmental Requalification of neighbourhoods

LCA:

Life-cycle assessment

QUEP:

Assessment of the quality of public spaces

HQDIL:

Heritage and resources, local environmental quality, diversity, integration and social link

INDI:

INDIcator impacts

PDAU:

Director plan of management and urban planning

POS:

Plan of ground occupation

HQE2R:

Sustainable renovation of buildings towards sustainable neighbourhoods

ISDIS:

Integrated sustainable development indicators system

PUD:

Urban Director Plan

ZHUN:

New urban housing zones

SD:

Sustainable development

APRUE:

National Agency for the Promotion and Rationalization of the Use of Energy

LED:

Light-emitting diode

ADE:

Algerian Water Company

SONELGAZ:

National Society for Electricity and Gas

References

  1. APRUE. (2015). Un guide pour rationaliser la consommation énergétique dans le secteur du bâtiment, novembre 2015. L’Agence nationale pour la promotion et la rationalisation de l’utilisation de l’énergie (APRUE). https://portail.cder.dz/IMG/article_PDF/article_a4956.pdf. Accessed February 20 2018.

  2. Berezowska-Azzag, E. (2012) Projet Urbain, Guide méthodologique. Volume 2: Comprendre la démarche du projet urbain. Collection Urbanisme, Editions Synergie, Alger (p. 387).

  3. Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed., p. 384). Newton: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry-Chikhaoui, I., Dorier, E., Haouès-Jouve, S., & Dario, J. (2014). Introduction. Méditerranée,123(2), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blum, A. (2007). HQE2R, research and demonstration for assessing sustainable neighbourhood development. In: M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, R. Vreeker. Sustainable urban development volume 2: The environmental assessment methods (pp. 412–428). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouzir, T., Zemmouri, N., & Berkouk, D. (2017). Assessment of noise pollution in the City of Biskra, Algeria. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 11(12), 1052–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2004a). La démarche HQE2R de conduite de projet urbain intégrant le développement durable—synthèse. La Calade. http://www.aphekom.uvsq.fr/IMG/pdf/Synthese_de_la_demarche_Hqe2r.pdf. Accessed July 13 2017.

  8. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin P. (2004b). L’intégration du développement durable dans les projets d’aménagement et de renouvellement urbain. Edition La Calade - Valbone (p. 205).

  9. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2009). Écoquartier mode d’emploi (p. 244). Paris: Ed.Eyrolles.

  10. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2005). Des indicateurs de développement durable pour l’évaluation des projets de renouvellement urbain: le modèle INDI –RU 2005. Projet SUSI-MAN, Ed.La Calade. Mars 2005. www.crdd-lacalade.com et www.suden.org. Accessed June 11 2017.

  11. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2007a). Développement durable et renouvellement urbain: des outils opérationnels pour améliorer la qualité de vie dans nos quartiers (p. 296). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2007b). Les Cahiers du développement urbain durable: Éco-quartiers et urbanisme durable. Urbia/Numéro 4 juin 2007 (pp. 193–209). Université de Lausanne. https://www.academia.edu/5514397/9_charlot_outrequin. Accessed March 22 2018.

  13. Charlot-Valdieu, C., & Outrequin, P. (2012). Concevoir et évaluer un projet d’écoquartier avec le référentiel INDI (p. 467). Paris: ED.Le Moniteur.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cherqui, F. (2005). Méthodologie d’évaluation d’un projet d’aménagement durable d’un quartier méthode ADEQUA. Thèse de doctorat, Université de La Rochelle (p. 182). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00012089/document. Accessed January 5 2018.

  15. Colombert, M., De Chastenet, C., Diab, Y., Gobin, C., Herfray, G., et al. (2011). Analyse de cycle de vie à l’échelle du quartier: un outil d’aide à la décision? Environnement Urbain/Urban Environment [En ligne], 5. http://journals.openedition.org/eue/690. Accessed February 22 2018.

  16. Dahlbom, B., Greer, H., Egmond, C., & Jonkers, R. (2009). Modifier le comportement énergétique: Directives relatives aux programmes de changement du comportement (p. 92), Université de Gothenburg, Ormobook. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/behave_guidelines_fr.pdf. Accessed March 3 2018.

  17. Delsante, I. (2016). Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: A comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa. Ambient Construction,5, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212016000300089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Drake, J., Andrea, B., & Marsaleket, J. (2013). Review of environmental performance of permeable pavement systems: State of the knowledge. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada,48(3), 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Environment Agency Wales (EAW). (2012). Water and energy efficiency guidance for social housing. http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/Guidance%20on%20water%20and%20associated%20energy%20efficiency.pdf. Accessed 17 september 2018

  20. Gherbi, M. (2015). Instruments of urban planning in Algerian City: Reality and challenges. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture,9(2015), 807–812. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gondard-Delcroix, C. (2006). La combinaison des analyses qualitative et quantitative pour une étude des dynamiques de pauvreté en milieu rural malgache (p. 360). Thèse de doctorat. Université Bordeaux IV. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00165502. Accessed July 13 2018.

  22. Gurram, M. K., Bulusu, L. D., & Kinthada, N. R. (2015). Urban environmental quality assessment at ward level using AHP based GIS multi-criteria modeling—A study on Hyderabad City, India. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 15(3), 16–29.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haapio, A. (2012). Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,32(1), 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hadji, L. (2012). Méthode d’évaluation de la qualité des espaces publics dans un projet d’aménagement durable à Alger. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine. https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.125.0857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hafiane, A. (2007). Les projets d’urbanisme récents en Algérie”, 43rd ISOCARP Congress. https://www.academia.edu/8505963/Hafiane_Abderrahim_Les_projets_durbanisme_r%C3%A9cents_en_Alg%C3%A9rie_43rd_ISOCARP_Congress_2007_LES_PROJETS_DURBANISME_RECENTS_EN_ALGERIE_INTRODUCTION. Accessed February 2 2018.

  26. Haider, H., Hewageb, K., Umerc, A., Ruparathnab, R., Chhipi-Shresthab, G., et al. (2018). Sustainability assessment framework for small-sized urban neighbourhoods: An application of fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society,36, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamina, L., & Abbas, Y. (2015). Évolution des instruments de planification spatiale et de gestion urbaine en Algérie. Cinq Continents,5(11), 104–129.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heland, L. (2014). De la conception à l’appropriation des outils et méthodes pour quartiers durables par les professionnels et les usagers. Lettre d’information Ramau, n°26, mai 2014. http://www.ramau.archi.fr/spip.php?article838. Accessed February 15 2018.

  29. Herfray, G. (2011). Contribution à l’évaluation des impacts environnementaux des quartiers. Ingénierie de l’environnement. École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (p. 330). https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/pastel-00658220/. Accessed February 16 2018.

  30. Kerdoud, N. (2005). Bengladesh ou Medina? Espaces urbains périphériques et représentations: deux exemples à Annaba et à Guelma (Algérie). Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography (Online), Regional and Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.3000.

  31. Lotteau, M. (2017). Développement d’une approche d’intégration des questions de morphologie urbaine dans l’évaluation environnementale des projets d’aménagement à l’échelle du quartier basée sur l’analyse de cycle de vie (p. 244). Thèse de doctorat, université de Bordeaux. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01677273/. Accessed February 12 2018.

  32. Mebirouk, H., Zeghiche, A., & Boukhemis, K. (2005). Appropriations de l’espace public dans les ensembles de logements collectifs, forme d’adaptabilité ou contournement de normes? Cas des ZHUN d’Annaba (Nord-Est algérien). Norois, 195|2005 (pp. 59–77).

  33. Outrequin, P., & Charlot-Valdieu, C. (2003). The ISDIS & the INDI model: Assessment of neighbourhood regeneration scenarios, action plans or projects from a SD indicators system (p. 34). La Calade—CSTB. http://hqe2r.cstb.fr/https://app.box.com/s/qsn30us36h. Accessed   December 25 2019.

  34. Patera, L. R., & Cristeab, S. L. (2016). Systemic definitions of sustainability, durability and longevity. In SIM 2015/13th international symposium in management procedia social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 221, pp. 362–371).

  35. Peuportier, B., Popovici, E., & Trocme, M. (2006). Analyse de cycle de vie à l’échelle du quartier. Chambéry: Séminaire ADEQUA Quartiers Durables.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rahal, F., Benharrats, N., Blond, N., Clappier, A., & Ponche, J. L. (2014). Modelling of air pollution in the area of Algiers City, Algeria. International Journal of Environment and Pollution,54(1), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijep.2014.064049.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Retzlaff, R. C. (2009). Green buildings and building assessment systems: A new area of interest for planners. Journal of Planning Literature,24(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412209349589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sehili, F., Chennaoui, Y., & Madani, S. (2016). The Hqdil method to assess the sustainability of a Historic Center Case of Mansourah K’bira (Algeria). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,216, 570–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sharifi, A., & Murayama, A. (2013). A critical review of seven selected neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,38, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Srir, M. (2013). Vers un référentiel d’aménagement durable pour Alger (pp. 153–169). Urbia. Hors-série N° 1, avril 2013. Université de Lausanne. https://www.unil.ch/files/live/sites/ouvdd/files/shared/URBIA/urbia_hors_serie/Decoupe_11.pdf. Accessed December 23 2017.

  41. To Uyen, B. (2012). L’intégration du développement durable dans les projets de quartier: le cas de la ville d’Hanoi, Architecture et aménagement de l’espace (p. 413), Thèse de doctorat. Université de Toulouse. Accessed February 13 2018.

  42. UN-Habitat. (2017). Building sustainability assessment and benchmarking - an introduction. United Nations Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). http://www.eurima.org/uploads/ModuleXtender/Publications/88/Force_Study_Building_certification_systems_May_2012.pdf.

  43. Villalba, B., Goxe, A., & Lipovac, J-C. (2005). Évaluer le développement durable: enjeux, méthodes, démarches d’acteurs. Développement durable et territoires [En ligne], Points de vue (2003–2010). https://doi.org/10.4000/developpementdurable.1676. https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/1676. Accessed April  3 2018.

  44. Yepez-Salmon, G. (2011). Construction d’un outil d’évaluation environnementale des écoquartiers: vers une méthode systémique de mise en œuvre de la ville durable (p. 375). Thèse de doctorat. Université de Bordeaux. http://ori-oai.u-bordeaux1.fr/pdf/2011/YEPEZ_SALMON_GRACE_2011.pdf. Accessed February 20 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Catherine Charlot-Valdieu (Economist specialist in eco-neighbourhood design and assessment and President at Suden Association for the promotion of sustainable urban development) and Philippe Outrequin (PhD in economics, expert on energy issues and sustainable urban development and Author of “La Calade”, a consultancy and help desk in sustainable development and energy strategy) for their support and contributions with assessment tools.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatima Chaguetmi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Supplementary data

Appendix: Supplementary data

The following Tables 4 and 5 are the supplementary data related to this article.

Table 4 Measures of the targets and objectives of the Plain West neighbourhood by INDI-RU 2005 repository
Table 5 Legend of “Benchmark” for qualitative values (supplementary data for Table 2)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaguetmi, F., Derradji, M. Assessment of the environmental quality of neighbourhoods in the context of sustainable development: case of the Plain West in Annaba, Algeria. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 4563–4588 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00398-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environmental quality
  • Assessment
  • Plain West neighbourhood
  • HQDIL method
  • Sustainable development