Sustainable domestic lighting options for poor people—an empirical study

Abstract

The availability of sustainable and reasonably priced sources of energy for lighting is a prerequisite for the development of rural India. This study attempts to take a close look at the micro-level energy scene and its various options for domestic lighting, considering socio-economic condition of the poor people in rural areas. The concept of calculating levelized cost as cost per 300 lumen-hour is applied on source–device combinations of lighting and validated in Bargaon Community Development Block of Sundergarh District in Odisha, India, for finding out the low-priced energy sources for sufficient lighting. It is revealed that LED and CFL through solar photovoltaic and electricity should be the best choice of domestic lighting. Most of the households (97 %), even electrified, use kerosene regularly. There is a huge potential of biogas and solar photovoltaic which can overcome the problem of power cut, indoor pollution, carbon emission, etc. Supporting electrification to all households, this study is also justifying about efficient devices and off-grid power generation through SPV for all households and biogas for possible 2300 households. Government should immediately intervene, providing capital subsidy, micro-finance schemes, other credit mechanisms, training to local youths, etc. with adequate infrastructure and organizational development to make the clean energy such as solar home lighting system and biogas plant affordable and accessible by the poor villagers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Barlett II, J E., Kotrlik, J W., Higgins, C C., Spring. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 19(1).

  2. Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. (2006). Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy? Energy Policy, 34(2006), 3387–3397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Branker, K., Pathak, M. J. M., & Pearce, J. M. (2011). A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4470–4482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Census. (2011). Government of India. http://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/Listofvillagesandtowns.aspx.

  5. Central Electricity Authority. (2013). Ministry of Power, Government of India. CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector. User guide, version 8.0. http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/planning/cdm_co2/user_guide_ver8.pdf.

  6. Central Electricity Authority. (2015). Ministry of Power, Government of India, Progress report of village electrification as on March 31, 2015 as per 2011, http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/monthly/dpd_div_rep/village_electrification.pdf.

  7. Chamania, S., Chouhan, R., Awasthi, R., Bendell, R., Marsden, N., Gibson, J., et al. (2015). Pilot project in rural western Madhya Pradesh, India, to assess the feasibility of using LED and solar-powered lanterns to remove kerosene lamps and related hazards from homes. Burns, 41(3), 595–603. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2014.09.001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chilcott, R P. (2006). Compendium of chemical hazards: Kerosene (fuel oil) chemical hazards and poisons division (HQ), Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0RQ, UK.

  9. Clarke, K. (2014). India energy subsidy review. 2(1), http://www.iisd.org/GSI/sites/default/files/ffs_india_review_v1i2.pdf.

  10. Dikshit, A. K., & Birthal, P. S. (2010). Environmental value of dung in mixed crop-livestock systems. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80(7), 679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldemberg, J. (2004). The Case for renewable energies, thematic background paper, international conference for renewable energies, Bonn.

  12. Harald, W., et al. (2011). Access and affordability of electricity in developing countries. World Development, 39(6), 1037–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harish, S M., & Tongia, R.(2014). Do rural residential electricity consumers cross-subside their urban counterparts? Exploring the inequity in supply in the Indian power sector, Brookings India working paper 04.

  14. Jacobson, A. et al. (2013). Black carbon and kerosene lighting: An opportunity for rapid action on climate change and clean energy for development. 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC20036: The Brookings Institution. Policy paper 2013-03, global views.

  15. Jana, C., & Chattopadhyay, R N. (2004). Block level energy planning for domestic lighting—A multi objective fuzzy linear programming approach, Energy, Elsevier, 29(11), 1819–1829.

  16. Kevin, B. (2012). In the developing world, solar is cheaper than fossil fuel. Technology review. http://www.technologyreview.com/news/426718.

  17. Khandker, S R., Barnes, D F., Samad, H A. (2010). Energy poverty in rural and urban India are the energy poor also income poor? The World Bank, Development Research Group, Agriculture and Rural Development Team, WPS546.

  18. Mahila, T. M. I., et al. (2005). Cost benefit analysis and emission reduction of lighting retrofits I residential sector. Energy and Building, 37, 573–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mills, E. (2003). Technical and economic performance analysis of kerosene lamps and alternative approaches to illumination in developing countries, Energy Analysis Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, MS 90-4000, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.

  20. MNRE-NABARD. (2014). http://www.thriveenergy.co.in/subsidy-schemes/mnre-nabard-solar-home-lighting.

  21. National Housing Bank. (2014). Loan-cum-Capital Subsidy Scheme for Installation of Solar Water Heating and Solar Lighting Equipments in Homes. http://www.nhb.org.in/Whats_new/Solar-Subsidy-Scheme-Version-2.pdf.

  22. Navigant Consulting Inc. (2012). Report on life-cycle Assessment of energy and environmental impacts of LED lighting products part I: Review of the life-cycle energy consumption of incandescent, compact fluorescent, and LED lamps, prepared for solid-state lighting program, building technologies program office of energy efficiency and renewable energy U.S Department of Energy.

  23. Oda, H., & Yuko, T. (2011). The Determinants of rural electrification: The case of Bihar India. Energy Policy, 39(2011), 3086–3095. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palit, D., & Chaurey, A. (2013). Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia, green energy and technology. In S. Bhattacharyya (Ed.), Rural electrification through decentralised off-grid systems in developing countries. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4673-5_4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India (2014) http://ppac.org.in/content/150_1_Subsidy.aspx and http://petroleum.nic.in/docs/pngstat.pdf.

  26. Poor people’s energy outlook 2014, ISBN 978 1 78044 856 5 Ebook, The Schumacher Centre Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire CV23 9QZ, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd. www.practicalactionpublishing.org.

  27. Poppendieck, D., Apple, J., Vicente, R., Yarberry, A., Lohse, N., Tracy, J. (2010). Exposure to particulate matter from kerosene lamps. Report for the second global business conference and trade fair for off-grid lighting in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.

  28. Raman, P., Murali, J., Sakthivadivel, D., & Vigneswaran, V. S. (2012). Opportunities and challenges in setting up solar photo voltaic based micro grids for electrification in rural areas of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3320–3325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao, P. S. C., Miller, J. B., Wang, Y. D., & Byrne, J. B. (2009). Energy-microfinance intervention for below poverty line households in India. Energy Policy, 37, 1694–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reddy, B. S., & Nathan, H. S. K. (2013). Energy in the development strategy of Indian households—The missing half. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rehman, I. H., et al. (2005). Availability of kerosene to rural households: A case study from India. Energy Policy, 33, 2165–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. REN 21. (2013). Energy for development: The potential role of renewable energy in meeting the Millennium Development Goals (pp. 7–9). www.worldwatch.org/system/files/ren21-1.pdf.

  33. Stern, Paul C. (2014). Individual and household interactions with energy systems: Toward integrated understanding. Energy Research and Social Science, 1, 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Thiam, Djiby Racine. (2011). Renewable energy, poverty alleviation and developing nations: Evidence from Senegal. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 22(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Urban, F., Benders, R. M. J., & Moll, H. C. (2009). Energy for rural India. Applied Energy, 86, S47–S57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wright, D. G., Dey, P. K., & Brammer, John G. (2013). A fuzzy levelised enegy cost method for renewable energy technology assessment. Energy Policy, 62, 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. World Bank Report. (2010). Empowering rural India: Expanding electricity access by mobilizing local resources, South Asia energy unit, Sustainable development department. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INDIAEXTN/Resources/empowering-rural-india-expanding-electricity-access-by-mobilizing-local-resources.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chinmoy Jana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jana, C. Sustainable domestic lighting options for poor people—an empirical study. Environ Dev Sustain 18, 1559–1573 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9702-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Domestic lighting
  • Lumen
  • Levelized cost
  • Solar photovoltaic
  • Sustainability