Challenges of small protected areas in urban cities: a case study of Okhla Bird Sanctuary, India
- 374 Downloads
Protected areas have been earmarked throughout the world for the purpose of conserving the biodiversity. The protected areas are facing serious threats due to rapid urban growth, especially in the developing countries like India. The current threats and impacts of urbanization on the Okhla Bird Sanctuary (Delhi, India) have been presented in this paper as a case in point. Uncontrolled urbanization and the lack of policy implementation have been identified as one of the major contributors to incessant biodiversity loss in India and other countries. In addition, a possible management framework for a smaller protected area in an urban setting is presented in brief.
KeywordsProtected areas Urbanization Buffer zones Okhla Bird Sanctuary Important bird areas
- Bhatnagar, G. V. (2010). Migratory bird count falls sharply in Delhi. The Hindu (New Delhi). http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/migratory-bird-count-falls-sharply-in-delhi/article724888.ece. Accessed 02 Jan 2015.
- Birdlife International (2009). Birdlife International trustees report and accounts. http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 13 June 2013.
- Brandon, K. (1997). Policy and practical considerations in land-use strategies for biodiversity conservation. In R. Kramer (Ed.), Last stand: Protected areas and the defence of tropical biodiversity (pp. 90–91). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- CEC. (2012). Recommendations of the CEC for declaration of buffer zones around National Parks and Sanctuaries, Central Empowered Committee. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
- CPCB. (1999). Bio-mapping of rivers, Parivesh. In A news letter from ENVIS Centre—Central Pollution Control Board, March.Google Scholar
- CPCB. (2000). The noise pollution (regulation and control) rules. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.Google Scholar
- CPCB. (2009). National ambient air quality standards. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board, Government of India.Google Scholar
- CPCB. (2011). Annual report: 2010–2011. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board. Government of India.Google Scholar
- Dudley, N., & Stolton, S. (1994). Air pollution and biodiversity: A review. http://www.equilibriumconsultants.com/publications/docs/airpollutionandbiodi4f9.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2013.
- Emerton, E., Bishop, J., & Thomas, L. (2003). Sustainable financing of protected areas: A global review of challenges and options. In P. Valentine (Ed.), Best practice protected area guidelines series no. 13, Cambridge, UK. Gland: The World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
- IPS (2013). Angry birds skip polluted Delhi, Inter Press Service News Agency. http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/08/angry-birds-skip-polluted-delhi/. Accessed 22 Dec 2014.
- Islam, Z., Rahmani, A. R., Choudhury, A., Lahkar, K., Lachungpa, U., et al. (2004). Important bird areas in Asia-India, birdlife conservation series no. 13. http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/ibasasia. Accessed 23 May 2013.
- IUCN, & Dudley, N. (Eds.). (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).Google Scholar
- Kohli, K. (2006). Okhla Bird Sanctuary gets a breather. http://infochangeindia.org/environment/features/okhla-bird-sanctuary-gets-a-breather.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.
- Mamgain, A. (2014). Birds give polluted Okhla sanctuary a miss. Hindustan Times (Delhi). http://paper.hindustantimes.com/epaper/viewer.aspx. Accessed 22 Dec 2014.
- Manral, U., & Khudsar, F. A. (2013). Assessment of wetland water quality and avian diversity of a human-modified floodplain wetland on river Yamuna. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5, 25–33.Google Scholar
- Manral, U., Raha, A., Solanki, R., Hussain, S. A., Mohan, D., Talukdar, G., & Veeraswami, G. G. (2012). Hydrological characteristics and flood plain vegetation of human impacted wetlands: A case study from Okhla Bird Sanctuary, National Capital Region, India. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, 1(2), 110–119.Google Scholar
- Martino, D. (2001). Buffer zones around protected areas: A brief literature review. Electronic Green Journal, 1(15). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item. Accessed on 22 May 2013.
- Mclnnes, R. (2010). Urban development, biodiversity and wetland management: Expert workshop report. UN: Habitat and Ramsar Convention on Wetland.Google Scholar
- MoEF. (2009). India’s fourth national report to the convention on biological diversity. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
- MoEF. (2011). Protected area network in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests. Government of India.Google Scholar
- MoEF. (2012a). Environmental and social management framework: Third phase of the adaptable program loan on strengthening regional cooperation for wildlife protection in Asia. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
- MoEF. (2012b). Note regarding safety zones (eco-sensitive zones) around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries, Centrally Empowered Committee. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
- NLWRA. (2008). Assessment of Australia’s terrestrial biodiversity. In Report prepared by the biodiversity assessment working group of the National Land and Water Resources Audit (NLWRA) for the Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
- Noida. (2010). Renovation, preservation, protection and beautification of park at Sector-95, Noida, Uttar Pradesh for environmental appraisal. (File No. 21-18/2010-I.A. III). New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, India.Google Scholar
- Parris, K. M., & Schneider, A. (2008). Impacts of traffic noise and traffic volume on birds of roadside habitats. Ecology and Society, 14 (online). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art29/
- Prasad, S. N., & Vasudeva Rao, V. (2010). Summary of the findings of impact assessment of construction and felling of trees on the environs of Okhla Bird Sanctuary. Prepared by Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON) and All India Network Project (AINP) on Agricultural Ornithology of ANGR Agricultural University, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
- Reid, W. V., Mcneely, J. A., Tunstall, D. B., Bryant, D. A., & Winograd, M. (1993). Biodiversity indicators for policy makers. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).Google Scholar
- Reid, W., & Miller, K. (1989). Keeping options alive: The scientific basis for conserving biodiversity. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
- Sayer, J. (1991). Rainforest buffer zones: Guidelines for protected area managers. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)—The World Conservation Union, Forest Conservation Programme.Google Scholar
- Singh, D. (2013). Less birds visit Okhla sanctuary this year, but number of species goes up. Hindustan Times. http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/newdelhi/less-birds-visit-okhla-sanctuary-this-year-but-number-of-species-goes-up/article1-1005973.aspx. Accessed 29 Dec 2014.
- The World Bank (2014). See: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/EXTSDNET/EXTEOFD/0,contentMDK:23135639~pagePK:64168445–piPK:64168309~theSitePK:8426771,00.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.
- TNN. (2014). A sanctuary by chance, now under siege. Times News Network. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/noida/A-sanctuary-by-chance-now-under-siege/articleshow/38800065.cms. Accessed 02 Jan 2015.
- UNEP. (2010). Biodiversity is life, United Nations environment programme. Nairobi: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).Google Scholar
- Urfi, A. J. (2003). The birds of Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, Delhi, India. Forktail, 19, 39–50.Google Scholar
- Wells, M., & Brandon, K. (1993). The principles and practice of buffer zones and local participation in biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 22, 157–162.Google Scholar
- WWF. (2004). Are protected areas working?—An analysis of forest protected areas by WWF. Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) International.Google Scholar