Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Weaving complexity and accountability: approaches to higher education learning design (HELD) in the built environment

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of built environment professionals—planners, construction and project managers and property professionals—is to develop efficient cities improving social, environmental and economic outcomes. Professional practice that strikes a balance between the built and natural environment requires graduates with multidisciplinary skill sets, dictating the need for cross-disciplinary practice in undergraduate study. If we want alternative approaches to development, we must nurture professional capabilities that allow for a change in the way we see and act. In the light of this, we seek to enfranchise the many stakeholders engaged in the professional education programs offered in higher education. Higher education plays a central role in the development of professionals with the ability to recognise and mitigate the environmental impacts of traditional practice. This paper presents how courses in two Schools at RMIT, Global, Urban and Social Studies and Property, Construction and Project Management, have developed a transferable framework through which environmental capabilities may be embedded into undergraduate education. It explores the role higher education plays in the development of graduate capabilities and presents a conceptualisation of processes to realise this, through the Higher Education Learning Design Framework for development, and renewal, of traditional courses. The paper offers with a detailed exposition of the HELD framework against two courses. We explore this framework in relation to knowledge themes, professional and generic skills and assessment design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. In Australia, domestic undergraduate students pay a contribution and are awarded a Commonwealth Supported Place (CSP), the majority of which is funded through general revenue. At the time of writing, the Federal Government has proposed significant changes to this model.

References

  • Badland, H., Whitzman, C., Lowe, M., Davern, M., Aye, L., Butterworth, I., & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science and Medicine, 111, 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, Simon., Hughes, Clair,. Smith, Calvin. (2009). The National Graduate Attributes Project: integration and assessment of graduate attributes in curriculum. (The University of Sydney). http://www.olt.gov.au/project-integration-assessment-graduate-sydney-2007.

  • Bibby, T. (2009). How do children understand themselves as learners? Towards a learner-centred understanding of pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 221–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, M. (2000). Social capital, civil society, and social transformation. In Robert F. Woollard & Aleck S. Ostry (Eds.), Fatal consumption: Rethinking sustainable development (pp. 69–97). Canada: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, A. (2012). Recognizing uncertainty and linked decisions in public participation: A new framework for collaborative urban planning. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 29(2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. W. (2009). Knowing our places? Contexts and edges in integrating disciplines in built environment education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(2), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chettiparamb, A. (2011). Inter-disciplinarity in teaching: Probing urban studies. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 6(1), 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrave, A., & Alkhaddar, R. (2006). Greening the curricula within construction programmes. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 1(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., & Walker, K. J. (Eds.). (2012). Environmental policy failure. Prahran: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society—The National Committee of Inquiry into higher education. UK Government: Secretaries of State for Education and Employment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, B. (1999). Sustainable architecture: European directives and building design (229th ed., pp. xiv–xvi). Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum for the Future. (2000). Understanding sustainability. Cheltenham: Forum for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groccia, J. E., & Buskist, W. (2011). Need for evidence-based teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasic, T. (2001). A sustainable urban matrix: Achieving sustainable urban form in residential buildings. In K. Williams, E. Burton, & M. Jenks (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form (pp. 329–336). New York: SPON Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, S., & Hegarty, K. From praxis to delivery: A higher education learning design framework (HELD). International Journal of Cleaner Production (forthcoming).

  • Holdsworth, S., & Sandri, O. (2014). Sustainability education and the built environment: experiences from the classroom. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 9(1), 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdsworth, S., Thomas, I., & Hegarty, K. (2013). Sustainability education : Theory and practice. In Michael Brody, Robert Stevenson, Arjen Wals, & Justin Dillon (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J. (2005). Education for sustainable development: A briefing paper for the teacher training agency. Teacher Training Agency. www.ttrb.ac.uk/viewArticle2.aspx?contentId=11324. Accessed 1 February 2009.

  • Jamieson, P., Dane, J. & Lippman, P. (2005). Moving beyond the classroom: Accommodating the changing pedagogy of higher education. Proceedings of the 2005 Forum of the Australasian Association for Institutional Research. Melbourne, Australia.

  • Kemmis, S., & Fitzclarence, L. (1986). Curriculum theorising: Beyond reproducing theory. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Haapala, K. R., Rivera, J. L., Hutchins, M. J., Endres, W. J., Gershenson, J. K., & Sutherland, J. W. (2005). Infusing sustainability principles into manufacturing/mechanical engineering curricula. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 24(3), 215–225.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, C. A., & Dink, C. (Eds.). (2001). Sustainable practices in the built environment (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterwort Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legacy, C., Curtis, C., & Sturup, S. (2012). Is there a good governance model for the delivery of contemporary transport policy and practice? An examination of Melbourne and Perth. Transport Policy, 19(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (2005). Ecosystem and human well-being: Opportunities and challenges for business and industry the fourth millennium ecosystem assessment report. www.millenniumassessment.org.

  • Mees, P. (2010). Transport for suburbia: Beyond the automobile age. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J., & Talbot, R. (2001). Sustainable Social Housing for No Extra Cost? In K. Williams, E. Burton, & M. Jenks (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form (pp. 319–328). London and New York: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P., & Jennings, I. (2008). Cities as sustainable ecosystems: principles and practices. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, S. (2009). Transformational higher education in the built environment. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. (2010). Designing high density cities: For social and environmental sustainability. London: EarthScan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Introduction: Mode 2' revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41(3), 179–194.

  • OECD. (2003). Environmentally sustainable buildings: Challenges and policies. France: OECD publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, B. (2013). Graduate attributes as a focus for institution-wide curriculum renewal: Innovations and challenges. Higher Education Research and Development, 32(3), 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, S., Johnson, A., Buckland, H., & White, E. (2004). Learning and skills for sustainable development: Developing a sustainability literate society. London: Higher Education Partnership for Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, C-j., Peach, D., Pocknee, C., Webb, F., Fletcher, M., Pretto, G. (2008). The Work Integrated Learning (WIL) report: A national scoping study—Australian learning and teaching council (ALTC) final report. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology. www.altc.edu.au & www.acen.edu.au.

  • Porritt, J. (2007). Capitalism as if the world matters. Sterling: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W. E. (2006). Why Conventional Economic Logic Won’t Protect Biodiversity. In D. M. Lavigne (Ed.), Gaining ground: In pursuit of ecological sustainability (Vol. 14, pp. 207–226). Limerick: International Fund for Animal Welfare, Guelph, Canada, and the University of Limerick.

    Google Scholar 

  • RMIT. (2010). Managing for Sustainability Course Guide Semester 2 2010., BUIL 1229 Australia: RMIT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (2010). Learning to love the questions: Emergent curriculum and the human body project. Learning Summer 2010. http://www.ecebc.ca/resources/journal/2010summer/03.html.

  • Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (2011). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandri, O. (2014). Good practice learning and teaching for sustainability in higher education. Unpublished doctoral (PhD) Thesis, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies & RMIT University, Australia.

  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivam, A., & Karuppannan, S. (2010). The sustainability of affordable housing, In: Velayutham, S., Ebert, N., & Watkins, S. (Eds.), Presented at the annual conference of The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) (Macquarie University, Sydney) 6–9 December 2010, ISBN 978-0-646-54628-5.

  • Sterling, S. (1996). Education in Change. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.), Education for sustainability (Chapter 2) (pp. 18–39). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education re-visioning learning and change schumacher (briefings number 6). UK: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stibbe, A., & Villiers-Stuart, P. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world. Dartington: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomalty, R. (2009). The ecology of cities. Alternatives Journal, 35(4), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). United Nations Decade of education for sustainable development 2005–2014: Draft international implementation scheme. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001399/139937e.pdf.

  • Veenman, M., van Hout-Wolters, B., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies: A capabilities approach. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, R. (2000). Sustainable Architecture-Cities, Buildings and Technology. Presented at Sustainable Building 2000 Conference, Maastricht.

  • Wells, G., & Edwards, A. (Eds.). (2013). Pedagogy in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woollard, Robert F. (2000). Introduction: fatal consumption (when too much is not enough). In Robert F. Woollard & Aleck S. Ostry (Eds.), Fatal consumption: Rethinking sustainable development (pp. 3–18). Canada: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Kathryn Hegarty

  2. School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    Sarah Holdsworth

Authors
  1. Kathryn Hegarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Holdsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn Hegarty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hegarty, K., Holdsworth, S. Weaving complexity and accountability: approaches to higher education learning design (HELD) in the built environment. Environ Dev Sustain 17, 239–258 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9626-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9626-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation