Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 539–554 | Cite as

Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development–neoliberalism nexus in developing countries



The Rio+20 summit of the United Nations in Brazil in 2012 committed governments to formulate a set of sustainable development goals (SDGs) that would be integrated into the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) following its expiration in 2015. This decision has pushed sustainable development agenda into the limelight of development once again. Meanwhile, we note that the development agenda of many developing countries has been dominated by neoliberal orientation driven by market reforms, social inequality, and a move towards enhancing the economic competitiveness of the supply side of the economy. In this paper, we discuss the relationship between neoliberal economic agenda and sustainable development. We do so by examining how neoliberal policies of privatisation, trade liberalisation and reduction in governments spending stand to affect the attainment of sustainable development ideals and their implications on the post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals. The paper then suggests that relying solely on the mechanisms of the market in governing and allocating environmental resources is necessarily insufficient and problematic and therefore calls for a new approach—one which goes beyond just recognising the interdependency among social, environmental and economic goals and places issues of equity and addressing unfavourable power relations at the centre of interventions aimed at achieving the ideals of sustainable development.


Sustainable development goals Neoliberalism Environment Sustainable development 


  1. Adger, W. N., Kelly, P. M., & Ninh, N. H. (Eds.). (2001). Living with environmental change: Social vulnerability, adaptation and resilience in Vietnam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlers, R. (2010). Fixing and nixing: The politics of water privatization. Review of Radical Political Economics, 42, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altieri, M. A., & Rojas, A. (1998). Ecological impacts of Chile’s neoliberal policies, with special emphasis on agroecosystems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amann, E., & Baer, W. (2002). Neoliberalism and its consequences in Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 34, 945–959.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, T. L., & Leal, D. R. (2001). Free Market Environmentalism. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91, 877–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arsel, M., & Buscher, B. (2012). Nature™ Inc.: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Development and Change, 43, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakker, K. J. (2003). An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bakker, K. (2010). The limits of ‘neoliberal natures’: Debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography, 34, 715–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barkin, D. (1997). Overcoming the neoliberal paradigm: Sustainable popular development. In 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association held in the Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico on April 1719, 1997. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.Google Scholar
  11. Barrow, C. J. (1995). Sustainable development: Concept, value and practice. Third World Planning Review, 17, 369–386.Google Scholar
  12. Barton, H. (2000). Sustainable communities: The potential for eco-neighbourhoods. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  13. Benhin, J. A., & Barbier, E. (2004). Structural adjustment programme, deforestation and biodiversity loss in Ghana. Environmental & Resource Economics, 27, 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bosworth, B., & Susan, M. C. (2003). The empirics of growth: An update. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 113–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boyd, E., Hultman, N., Roberts, J. T., Corbera, E., Cole, J., Bozmoski, A., et al. (2009). Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: Lessons learned and policy futures. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 820–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, K., & Corbera, E. (2003). Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy. Climate Policy, 3, S41–S56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third world political ecology: An introduction. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Budds, J. (2004). Power, nature and neoliberalism: The political ecology of water in Chile. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 25, 322–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Büscher, B., Sullivan, S., Neves, K., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2012). Towards a synthesized critique of neoliberal biodiversity conservation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23, 4–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Castree, N. (2008). Neoliberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A, 40(1), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang, H.-J. (2002). Kicking away the ladder: An unofficial history of capitalism, especially in Britain and the United States. Challenge, 45, 63–97.Google Scholar
  22. Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2004). How have the world’s poorest fared since the early 1980s? World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Conway, F. J. (2012). Certification and the state: Market-driven governance and regulation in a Chilean firewood program. The Journal of Environment and Development, 21(4), 438–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cotula, L., Vermeulen, S., Leonard, R., & Keeley, J. (2009). Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deals in Africa. London/Rome: FAO, IIED and IFAD.Google Scholar
  25. Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Cronin, T., Muharrom, E., Santoso, L., & Büdenbender, M. (2013). Equity and REDD+ in the media: a comparative analysis of policy discourses. Ecology and Society, 18(2), 39.Google Scholar
  26. Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Downing, T. (2003). Toward a vulnerability/adaptation science: lessons from famine early warning and food security. In J. Smith, R. Klein, & S. Huq (Eds.), Climate change adaptive capacity and development. London, UK: Imperial College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Easterly, W. (2005). What did structural adjustment adjust? The association of policies and growth with repeated IMF and World Bank adjustment loans. Journal of Development Economics, 76, 1–22.Google Scholar
  29. Fontúrbel, F. E., Barbieri, E., Herbas, C., Barbieri, F. L., & Gardon, J. (2011). Indoor metallic pollution related to mining activity in the Bolivian Altiplano. Environmental Pollution, 159(10), 2870–2875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2009). The argument against a reductionist approach for measuring sustainable development performance and the need for methodological pluralism. Accounting Forum, 33, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldman, M. (2005). Imperial nature: The world bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S. (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. The fate of sustainable development under neo-liberal regimes in developing countries. World Development, 33(9), 1511–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1992). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Princeton: Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  34. Haque, M. S. (1999). The fate of sustainable development under neo-liberal regimes in developing countries. International Political Science Review, 20, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of “the tragedy of the commons”. Science, 280, 682–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey, D. (2005). The new imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism: Pb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harvey, D. (2011). Roepke lecture in economic geography-crises, geographic disruptions and the uneven development of political responses. Economic Geography, 87, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Higgins, V., Dibden, J., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Neoliberalism and natural resource management: Agri-environmental standards and the governing of farming practices. Geoforum, 39, 1776–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hilson, G. (2003). Defining “cleaner production” and “pollution prevention” in the mining context. Minerals Engineering, 16(4), 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holden, S. T. (1997). Adjustment policies, peasant household resource allocation and deforestation in Northern Zambia: An overview and some policy conclusions. Forum for Development Studies, 24, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holmes, G. (2012). Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change, 43, 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Humphreys, D. (2009). Discourse as ideology: Neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ioris, A. A. R. (2012). The neoliberalization of water in Lima, Peru. Political Geography, 31(5), 266–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jenkins, R. (2000). Industry and environment in Latin America. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Kazimbaya-Senkwe, B. M., & Guy, S. C. (2007). Back to the future? Privatisation and the domestication of water in the Copperbelt Province of Zambia, 1900–2000. Geoforum, 38(5), 869–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein, N. (2010). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  48. Kosoy, N., & Corbera, E. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services as commodity. Ecological Economics, 69, 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Landell-Mills, N., & Porras, I. T. (2006). Silver bullet or fool’s gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
  50. Liverman, D. M., & Vilas, S. (2006). Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 327–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loftus, A. J., & McDonald, D. A. (2001). Of liquid dreams: A political ecology of water privatization in Buenos Aires. Environment and Urbanization, 13, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. López, R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manzetti, L., & Blake, C. H. (1996). Market reforms and corruption in Latin America: New means for old ways. Review of International Political Economy, 3, 662–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mcdonald, D., & Ruiters, G. (2005). The age of commodity: Water privatization in Southern Africa. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  55. Mcmichael, P. (2008). Development and social change: A global perspective. USA: Sage.Google Scholar
  56. Milanovic, B. (2002). Can we discern the effect of globalization on income distribution? Evidence from household budget surveys (online). Accessed Mar 23 2013.
  57. Morris, S. D., & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 1258–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mulok, D., Kogid, M., Asid, R., & Lily, J. (2012). Is economic growth sufficient for poverty alleviation? Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Cuadernos de Economía, 35(97), 26–32.Google Scholar
  59. Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1202–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Narsiah, S. & Ahmed, W. (2012). The Neoliberalization of the Water and Energy Sectors in South Africa and India. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 47(6), 679–694.Google Scholar
  61. Noman, O. (1996). Economic development and environmental policy. London: Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
  62. Pagiola, S., & Platais, G. (2002). Payments for environmental services. Environment Strategy Notes, 3(4), 1–23.Google Scholar
  63. Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2), 237–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. J. A., & Neunhöffer, G. (2005). Neoliberal hegemony: A global critique. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  65. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  66. Porras, I., Grieg-Gran, M., & Neves, N. (2008). All that glitters: A review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. Natural Resource Issues No. 11. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.Google Scholar
  67. Portes, A., & Hoffman, K. (2003). Latin American class structures: Their composition and change during the neoliberal era. Latin American Research Review, 38, 41–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raco, M. (2005). Sustainable development, rolled-out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode, 37, 324–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Redclift, M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13, 212–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Reddy, S. & Pogge, T. (2003). How not to count the poor (online). http://www.socialanalysis.org. Accessed Mar 23 2013.
  71. Reed, D. (2009). Structural adjustment, the environment, and sustainable development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  72. Renfrew, D. (2009). In the margins of contamination: lead poisoning and the production of neoliberal nature in Uruguay. Journal of Political Ecology, 16, 87–103.Google Scholar
  73. Ribot, J. C., Magalhaes, A. R., & Panagides, S. S. (1996). Climate variability, climate change and social vulnerability in the semi-arid tropics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., & Chapin, F. S. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14, 32.Google Scholar
  76. Rodrigues, M. G. M. (2003). Privatization and socioenvironmental conditions in Brazil’s Amazonia: Political challenges to neoliberal principles. The Journal of Environment and Development, 12, 205–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rudel, T. K. (2005). Tropical forests: Regional paths of destruction and regeneration in the late twentieth century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Rudel, T., & Horowitz, B. (1993). Tropical deforestation: Small farmers and land clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Saboori, B. & Sulaiman, J. (2013). Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia. Energy Policy, 60, 892–905.Google Scholar
  80. Schilcher, D. (2007). Growth versus equity: The continuum of pro-poor tourism and neoliberal governance. Current Issues in Tourism, 10(2–3), 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32, 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stiglitz, J. E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W Norton.Google Scholar
  83. Subramanian, S. (2009). How many poor in the world? A critique of Ravallion’s reply. Economic and Political Weekly, 44, 67–71.Google Scholar
  84. Suhardiman, D. (2013). The power to resist: Irrigation management transfer in Indonesia. Water Alternatives, 6, 25–41.Google Scholar
  85. Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253.Google Scholar
  86. United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2011). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session, held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010 (online). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf. Accessed Mar 14 2013.
  87. Vatn, A. D. (2010). An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. The power to Ecological Economics, 69, 1245–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Veldwisch, G. J., Beekman, W., & Bolding, A. (2013). Smallholder irrigators, water rights and investments in agriculture: Three cases from rural Mozambique. Water Alternatives, 6, 124–141.Google Scholar
  89. Veltmeyer, H. (1993). Liberalization and structural adjustment in Latin America, search of an alternative. Economic and Political Weekly, 28(39), 2080–2086.Google Scholar
  90. Vermeulen, S., & Cotula, L. (2010). Over the heads of local people: consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuels projects in Africa. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37, 899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wade, R. H. (2002). Globalization, Poverty and Income Distribution: Does the Liberal Argument Hold? (online). London: Development Studies Institute, LSE. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/DESTIN/pdf/WP33.pdf. Accessed Mar 23 2013.
  92. Williamson, J. (1989). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American readjustment: How much has happened. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  93. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wunder, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics, 13(3), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel Kumi
    • 1
  • Albert A. Arhin
    • 2
  • Thomas Yeboah
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Centre of Development Studies, Churchill CollegeUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeshireUK

Personalised recommendations