Comparison of understorey bird species in relation to edge–interior gradient in an isolated tropical rainforest of Malaysia
Forest fragmentation results in a loss of forest interior and an increase in edge habitat. As a result, these changes may affect the bird species distribution and composition. We studied how understorey bird community composition and habitat variables changed along an edge-to-interior gradient in a fragmented lowland rainforest in Peninsular Malaysia. Birds and environmental variables were recorded at each of the 93 sampling points distributed along the 14 parallel transects that were systematically placed across the gradient of distance from the forest edge to the forest interior. Species composition was different along the edge–interior gradient, although only a few species were strictly confined to either edge or interior habitat. Based on bird–habitat associations along the edge–interior gradient, some of these edge-preferred species occurred in high numbers at the matrix surrounding the patch. In contrast, the interior-specialist group, mainly terrestrial insectivores, avoided the forest edge and was positively associated with humidity, canopy cover, the number of dead trees, percentage of litter cover, and depth of the litter layer. Species endemic to the Sunda subregion were more abundant in the interior of the forest. From a conservation perspective, forest remnants in the lowlands of Peninsular Malaysia that have a deep leaf litter layer, dense canopy cover, high number of dead trees, and high relative humidity are able to support understorey bird species that are sensitive to edge effects. The forest has important conservation value even though it is fragmented and isolated.
KeywordsUnderstorey birds Isolated forest Diversity indices Edge forest Interior forest
We are grateful to all the people who have assisted us in the field during the data collection. This study was funded by the Research University Grand Scheme Fund Number 03/01/07/0043 RU.
- Borges, S. H., & Stouffer, P. C. (1999). Bird communities in two types of anthropogenic successional vegetation in central Amazonia. Condor, 101, 529–536.Google Scholar
- Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001). Introduction to distance sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, K. R., & Warwick, R. M. (Eds.) (2001). Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: Primer-E Ltd.Google Scholar
- King, D. I., Griffin, C. R., & DeGraaf, R. M. (1997). Effect of clear cut borders on distribution and abundance of forest birds in northern New Hampshire. Wilson Bulletin, 109, 239–245.Google Scholar
- Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91, 109–117.Google Scholar
- Lehtinen, R. M., Ramanamanjato, J. B., & Raveloarison, J. G. (2003). Edge effects and extinction proneness in a herpetofauna from Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1357–1370.Google Scholar
- M N R & E. (2009). An overview of wetlands in Malaysia. Conservation and environmental management division. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Technical Report, p. 5.Google Scholar
- Nordin, M., & Zakaria, M. (1997). Some effects of logging in mixed lowland dipterocarp forests on birds. In: Ong beng Gaik (Ed.), State of the Malaysian environment (pp. 161–166). Malaysia: Consumers’ Association of Penang Press.Google Scholar
- Seaby, R. M., Henderson ,P. A., & Somes, R. (2007). Community analysis package Version 4.0. Lymington: Pisces Conservation Ltd.Google Scholar
- Sodhi, N. S., Castelleta, M., Loh, W. Z., Lee, B. P. Y -H., & Subaraj, R. (2004). Tropical lowland rainforest birds on a highly urbanized island: monitoring, loss and lessons. In: Shaw, W.W., Harris, L.K., & VanDruff, L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Urban Wildlife Conservation (pp. 77–86). May 1–5, 1999, Tucson, Arizona. Google Scholar
- ter Braak, C. J. F., & Šmilauer, P. (2002). CANOCO reference manual and Cano draw for windows user’s guide: Software for canonical community ordination (Version 4.5). Ithaca, NY, (www.canoco.com): Microcomputer Power.
- Thomas, L., Laake, J. L., Strindberg, S., Marques, F. F. C., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Hedley, S. L., Pollard, J. H., Bishop, J. R. B., & Marques, T.A. (2006). Distance 5.0. Release “x” 1 . Research unit for wildlife population assessment. UK: University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
- Varasteh Moradi, H., Zakaria, M., & Rosli, Z. (2008). Comparison of bird species composition in relation to different disturbance level in a tropical lowland rain forest in Peninsular Malaysia. The Malaysian forester, 71, 173–186.Google Scholar
- Zakaria, M., Khairul, A., & Jamalun, N. (2002). Comparison of understorey bird species composition in a primary and logged mixed hill dipterocarp forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Malaysian Nature Journal, 19, 74–85.Google Scholar