Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1555–1571 | Cite as

Environmental justice of nuclear waste policy in Taiwan: Taipower, government, and local community

  • Gillan Chi-Lun Huang
  • Tim Gray
  • Derek Bell
Article

Abstract

This paper is an investigation into Taiwan’s policy on nuclear waste disposal, concentrating on the ways in which dumping sites have been chosen, and on the wider implications of those choices. The central aim was to examine whether this policy breached the distributive and procedural principles of environmental justice by discriminating against disadvantaged areas and minority ethnic groups. The paper first clarifies the meaning of environmental justice and then applies it to the case study of Taiwan’s decision announced in 2009 that Da-Ren (達仁鄉) in Taitung County (台東縣) and Wang-An (望安鄉) in Penghu County (澎湖縣) were its two favoured potential sites for the final disposal repository of radioactive waste. The findings of the research suggest that the Taiwan government and the nuclear power provider, Taipower, failed to fulfil the requirements of environmental justice in reaching this decision. The contribution of this case study to the literature on the environmental injustice of nuclear waste siting policies is fourfold. First, it adds to the growing number of studies that show how siting decisions systematically and deliberately disadvantage vulnerable communities. Second, it finds the basis of this discriminatory policy to lie in the wider pattern of inequality that exists in Taiwanese society—a pattern that is rooted in historical traditions of racial and tribal prejudice, reinforced by contemporary forms of corruption. Third, it suggests that a solution to the problem of environmental injustice in nuclear waste siting policy may have to wait until these broader practices of unequal treatment in Taiwan are addressed. Fourth, it speculates that the need for a solution to the nuclear waste problem may be a catalyst for dealing with these broader patterns of unequal treatment.

Keywords

Environmental justice Nuclear waste policy Taiwan 

References

  1. Act on Sites for Establishment of Low Level Radioactive Waste Final Disposal Facility. (2006). Taipei: Atomic Energy Council, Executive Yuan (in Mandarin). http://erss.aec.gov.tw/law/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL039264&KeyWordHL=&StyleType=1. Accessed 8 Oct 2008.
  2. Atomic Energy Council (AEC). (2006). Radioactive waste management in Taiwan: Low level radioactive waste final disposal. http://www.aec.gov.tw/english. Accessed 22 Jan 2007.
  3. Bell, D. (2004). Environmental justice and Rawls’ difference principle. Environmental Ethics, 26(3), 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, D. (2013). Coming of age? Environmental politics at 21. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boerner, C., & Lambert, T. (1995). Environmental injustice. Public Interest, Winter, Issue, 118, 61–82.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P. (1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33(3), 261–281.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L., & Tandon, R. (1983). Ideology and political economy in inquiry: Action research and participatory research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant, B. (1995). Issues and potential policies and solutions for environmental justice: an overview. In B. Bryant (Ed.), Environmental justice: issues, policies, and solutions (pp. 8–34). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bullard, R. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: race, class, and environmental quality (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson, A. (1998). Justice and the environment: Conceptions of environmental sustainability and dimensions of social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Easterling, D., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). The dilemma of siting a high-level nuclear waste Repository. Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Energy Bureau. (2010). Report on prediction of total electricity capacity from 20102019. Taipei: Ministry of Economic Affairs, Executive Yuan (in Mandarin).Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2002). Eurobarometer 56.2: Europeans and radioactive waste. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Fan, M.-F. (2006). Nuclear waste facilities on tribal land: The Yami’s struggles for environmental justice. Local Environment, 11(4), 433–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankfurt, H. (1988). Equality as a moral ideal. In H. Frankfurt (Ed.), The importance of what we care about (pp. 134–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freudenberg, N., & Steinsapir, C. (1992). Not in our back yard: the grassroots environmental movements. In: R. Dunlap & A. Mertig (Eds.), American environmentalism: the U.S. environmental movements 19701990 (pp. 27–38). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Fuel Circle and Material Administration. (2010). Index of environmental sustainability. Taipei: Atomic Energy Council (in Mandarin). http://gamma1.aec.gov.tw/fcma/environment_lasting_number.asp. Accessed 20 July 2011.
  18. Gaventa, J. (1991). Power and powerless: quiescence and rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hofrichter, R. (1993). Environmental justice for all. In R. Hofrichter (Ed.), Toxic struggles: the theory and practice of environmental justice (pp. 3–22). Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and disrespect: principles of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunt, J. (2001). Framing the problem of radioactive waste: public and institutional perspectives. In K. Anderson (Ed.), Proceedings VALDOR 2001—The 2nd VALDOR symposium addressing transparency in risk assessment and decision-making (pp. 222–229). Sweden: Stockholm.Google Scholar
  22. IET [Institution of Engineers and Technology]. (2005). Nuclear waste disposal and transportation of spent fuel. London: Institution of Engineers and Technology. http://www.iee.org/Policy/Areas/EnvEnergy/nucwaste.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2009.
  23. Ishiyama, N. (2003). Environmental justice and American Indian tribal sovereignty: Case study of a land-use conflict in skull valley, Utah. Antipode, 35(1), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuletz, V. (1998). The tainted desert. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Marshall, A. (2005). The social and ethical aspect of nuclear waste. Electronical Green Journal, 21, 1–22. http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj21/marshall1.html. Accessed 17 May 2008.
  26. Openshaw, S., Carver, S., & Fernie, J. (1989). Britain’s nuclear waste: Safety and siting. London: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  27. Parfit, D. (1998). Equality and priority. In A. Mason (Ed.), Ideals of equality (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenberg, A. (1995). Equality, sufficiency, and opportunity in the just society. Social Philosophy and Policy, 12(2), 54–71.Google Scholar
  29. Schlosberg, D. (1999). Environmental justice and the new pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schlosberg, D. (2003). The justice of environmental justice: reconciling, equality, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In A. Light & A. De-Shalit (Eds.), Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice (pp. 77–106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrader-Frechette, K. (2002). Environmental justice: Creating equality and reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Szasz, A. (1994). Ecopopulism: toxic waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Taiwan Power Company, Taipower. (2009). Nuclear backend fund. (in Mandarin). http://nplbudget.ly.gov.tw/budget_ly_97/txt/document/97pnb4_2_10.doc. Accessed 30 Jan 2009.
  36. Temkin, L. (2003). Equality, priority or what? Economic and Philosophy, 19(1), 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. USEPA [US Environmental Protection Agency]. (2000). Office of environmental justice F.A.Q. What is environmental justice? http://www.es.epa.gov/oeca/main/ej/faq.html. Accessed: 9 March 2009.
  38. Walker, G. (2012). Environmental justice: concepts, evidence and politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Weng, P. S. (2001). Taiwan’s nuclear history. Taipei: Atomic Energy Council (in Mandarin).Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, L. (2000). Nuclear waste: Exploring the ethical dilemmas. Toronto, ON: United Church Publishing House.Google Scholar
  41. Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public AdministrationNational Chengchi UniversityTaipei CityTaiwan
  2. 2.School of Geography, Politics and SociologyNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations