Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 859–885 | Cite as

An integrated approach for studying the land suitability for ecological corridors through spatial multicriteria evaluations

Case Study


Nature conservation is a very important issue in the sustainability assessments and spatial planning context. Knowledge of the suitability of the land to behave as an ecological corridor thus provides very significant input to land-use planning. Nature conservation and land-use planning are by their nature spatial problems. A family of methods that are rapidly gaining traction for planning and policymaking, named spatial multicriteria evaluations (SMCE), which are based on geographic information systems (GIS) and multicriteria analysis (MCA) coupling, can be an effective support for this area. The present paper proposes the integration of the GIS with a specific MCA technique, named Analytic Network Process to assess the ecological value of the land in the Piedmont Region (northern Italy). The results are obtained in the form of maps to be used as decision variables in planning. The study concludes with some lessons learned during the development of the SMCE and highlights that the applied methodology is an effective tool for decision makers in spatial planning and strategic assessments.


Spatial multicriteria evaluations Geographic information systems Ecological corridors planning Analytic Network Process Indicators 



The contribution is the result of the joint effort of the authors. Despite the global responsibility for the work being equally shared between the two authors, it should be noted that Valentina Ferretti was responsible for the research outlined in paragraphs 1, 2.1, 3.2.1 and 3.2.2, while Silvia Pomarico undertook the research described in paragraphs 2.2, 3.1, 3.2.3 and 3.2.4. The abstract and paragraphs 4 and 5 are the result of the joint work of the two authors.


  1. Aerts, J. C., Esinger, E., Heuvelink, G. B., & Stewart, T. J. (2003). Using integer linear programming for multi-site land-use allocation. Geographical Analysis, 35, 148–169.Google Scholar
  2. Ahern, J. (2002). Greenways as strategic landscape planning: Theory and application. Dissertation, The Netherlands, Waseningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
  3. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., & Jankowski, P. (2003). Building spatial decision support tools for individuals and groups. Journal of Decision Systems, 12, 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, M. P. (1993). Perspectives on the development of group decision support systems for locational problem solving. Geographical Systems, 1, 69–81.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, M. P., Densham, P. J., & Rushton, G. (1986). Architecture for a microcomputer-based decision support system. In 2nd International symposium on spatial data handling, 6–10 July 1986 Williamsville New York. Brussels: International Geographical Union (pp. 120–131).Google Scholar
  6. Baschak, L. A., & Brown, R. D. (1995). An ecological framework for the planning, design and management of urban river greenways. Landscape and Urban planning, 33, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bedard, Y., Merrett, T., & Han, J. (2001). Fundamentals of spatial data warehousing for geographic knowledge discovery. In H. Miller & J. Han (Eds.), Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, G. (2004). Integrating biodiversity conservation and sustainable use: Lessons learned from ecological networks. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, G., & Wit, P. (2001). The development and application of ecological networks: A review of proposals, plans and programmes. Amsterdam: AID Environment.Google Scholar
  10. Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2011). An Analytic Network Process (ANP) based approach for location problems: The case of a new waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy). Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 17, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruel, F., & Baudry, J. (1999). Ecologie du paysage, concepts, methods et application. Paris: Edition Technique et Documentation.Google Scholar
  12. Bruinderink, G. G., VanDerSluis, T., Lammertsma, D., Opdam, P., & Pouwels, R. (2003). Designing a coherent ecological network for large mammals in northwestern Europe. Conservation Biology, 17, 549–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burstein, F., & Holsapple, W. C. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook on decision support systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Carver, S. (1991). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charlton, M., & Ellis, S. (1991). GIS in planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 34(1), 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Church, R. L., Scaparra, M. P., & Middleton, R. S. (2004). Identifying critical infrastructure: The median and covering facility interdiction problems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Comuni Italiani. (2011). www.comuni-italiani.it. Accessed 14 Sep 2011.
  18. Densham, P. J. (1991). Spatial decision support systems. In D. J. Maguire, M. F. Goodchild, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems: Principles and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 403–412). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Densham, P. J., & Armstrong, M. P. (1987). A spatial decision support system for locational planning: Design, implementation and operation. In Eighth international symposium on computer-assisted cartography (AutoCarto 8), 30 March–2 April 1987 Baltimore, Maryland (pp. 112–121).Google Scholar
  20. Densham, P. J., & Goodchild, M. F. (1989). Spatial decision support systems: a research agenda. In GIS/LIS’89, 26–30 November 1989, Orlando (pp. 707–716).Google Scholar
  21. Duriavig, M. (2008). Dove corre un corridoio. Sistemi di supporto alla decisione: un’applicazione nel Sud Est di Bahia, Brasile. In: X National congress of the SIEP-IALE on “landscape ecology and governance”, 22-23 May 2008, Bari, Italy.Google Scholar
  22. Eastman, J. R. (2006). IDRISI Andes. Guide to GIS and image processing. Worcester: Clark University.Google Scholar
  23. Eastman, J. R., Kyen, P. A. K., & Toledno, J. (1993). A procedure for multiple-objective decision making in GIS under conditions of conflicting objectives. In J. Hents, H. F. L. Ottens, H. J. Scholten (Eds.), Fourth European conference on GIS (ESIG’93) proceedings, Genova (IT), 1(2), 438–447.Google Scholar
  24. Feick, R. D., & Hall, B. G. (2004). A method for examining spatial dimension of multi-criteria weight sensitivity. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18, 815–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferretti, V. (2011a). A multicriteria- spatial decision support system (MC-SDSS) development for siting a landfill in the Province of Torino (Italy). Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis, 18, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferretti, V. (2011b). Integrating Multicriteria Analysis and Geographic Information Systems: a survey and classification of the literature. In: 74 th meeting of the European Working Group on “Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding”, 6–8 October 2011, Yverdon Les Bains.Google Scholar
  27. Ferretti, V., & Pomarico, S. (2012). Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14(5), 843–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., & Carpenter, S. R. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gambino R. (2004). Conservazione e pianificazione dei sistemi di area vasta. In: Proceedings of the National Conference W.W.F. ITALIA ONLUS, Ecoregioni e reti ecologiche. Rome, 27–28 May 2004, 34–36.Google Scholar
  30. Geneletti, D. (2004). A GIS-based decision support system to identify nature conservation priorities in an alpine valley. Land Use Policy, 21, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geneletti, D. (2007). An approach based on spatial multicriteria analysis to map the nature conservation value of agriculture land. Journal of Environmental Management, 83, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geneletti, D. (2010). Combining stakeholder analysis and spatial multicriteria evaluation to select and rank inert landfill sites. Waste Management, 30(2), 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodchild, M. F. (1993). The state of GIS for environmental problem solving. In M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, & L. T. Steyaert (Eds.), Environmental modelling with GIS. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gurrutxaga, M., Lozano, P. J., & Del Barrio, G. (2010). GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18, 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hobbs, R. J. (2002). Habitat networks and biological conservation. In K. J. Gutzwiller (Ed.), Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation (pp. 150–170). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huber, P. R., Roth, N. E., Beardsley, K., Thorne, J. H., McCoy, M. C., & Meade, R. (2007). Potential impacts of urban growth on an ecological network in the San Joaquin Valley. San Francisco: Association for American Geographer’s.Google Scholar
  37. ILWIS 3.3. (2005). The integrated land and water information system. ITC, Enschede, http://www.itc.nl/ilwis/.
  38. IUCN. (1994). Parks for life. Action plan for protected areas in Europe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN Commission on National Parks and Protected Areas.Google Scholar
  39. Jankowski, P., & Richard, L. (1994). Integration of GIS based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection. Environment and Planning, 21, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janssen, R., & Rietveld, P. (1990). Multicriteria analysis and GIS; an application to agricultural landuse in the Netherlands. In H. J. Scholten & J. C. H. Stillwell (Eds.), Geographical information systems and urban and regional planning (pp. 129–139). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jongman, R. H. G., & Pungetti, G. (2004). Ecological networks and greenways. Concept, design, implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Khan, S., & Faisal, M. N. (2008). An Analytic Network Process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Management, 28(9), 1500–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Laaribi, A., Chevallier, J. J., & Martel, J. M. (1996). A spatial decision aid: a multicriterion evaluation approach. Computer Environment and Urban System., 20(6), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lega, P. (2004). La frammentazione infrastrutturale del territorio nella Provincia di Piacenza. Rapporto Interno n. 05/04.Google Scholar
  46. Leung, Y. (1997). Intelligent spatial decision support systems. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levy, J. K., Hartmann, J., Li, K. W., An, Y., & Asgary, A. (2007). Multi-criteria decision support systems for flood hazard mitigation and emergency response in urban watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(2), 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li, Y., Shen, Q., & Li, H. (2004). Design of spatial decision support systems for property professionals using MapObjects and Excel. Automation in Construction, 13, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maffiotti, A., & Vietti, D. (2006). Carta delle reti ecologiche in Piemonte. In Convegno ARPA “Fauna Selvatica e attività antropiche: Una convivenza possibile”, 3 April 2006, Torino.Google Scholar
  50. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  51. Malczewski, J. (2006). GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marulli, J., & Mallarach, J. M. (2005). A GIS methodology for assessing ecological connectivity: Application to the Barcelona Metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 243–262.Google Scholar
  53. McHarg, I. L. (1969). Design with nature. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Neaupane, K. M., & Piantanakulchai, M. (2006). Analytic Network Process model for landslide hazard zonation. Engineering Geology, 85(3/4), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nekhay, O., Arriaza, M., & Boerboom, L. (2009). Evaluation of soil erosion risk using Analytic Network Process and GIS: A case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3091–3104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Noss, R. F., & Daly, K. M. (2006). Incorporating connectivity into broad—scale conservation planning. In K. Crooks & M. Sanjayan (Eds.), Connectivity conservation (pp. 587–619). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nunes de Lima, M. V. (2005). Image2000 and CLC2000. Products and methods. Joint Research Center, European Commission.Google Scholar
  58. OCS—Osservatorio Città Sostenibili. (2002). Indice del grado di naturalità del territorio. OCS Doc 2/2002, Dipartimento Interateneo Territorio del Politecnico e dell’Università di Torino.Google Scholar
  59. Opdam, P., Steingröver, E., & van Rooij, S. (2006). Ecological networks: A spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Osservatorio Faunistico. (2011). Regione piemonte, www.regione.piemonte.it/agri/osserv_faun/index.htm. Accessed 20 Sep 2011.
  61. Pereira, J. M. C., & Duckstein, L. (1993). A multiple criteria decision making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7(5), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  63. Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Sharifi, M. A. (2007). Integrated planning and decision support systems: Concepts, adoption and evaluation. Asia Journal of Geo_Informatics, 7(4).Google Scholar
  65. Sharifi, M. A., & Retsios, V. (2004). Site selection for waste disposal through spatial multiple criteria decision analysis. Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 3, 28–38.Google Scholar
  66. Sharifi, M. A., & Rodriguez, E. (2002). Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resources rehabilitation: The case of Alcázar De San Juan District in the Aquifer 23, La Mancha, Spain. International Journal of Hydroinformatics, 4(3), 157–175.Google Scholar
  67. Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decision. New York: Harper and Row.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steinitz, C. (1993). Geographical information systems: A personal historical perspective, the framework for recent project, and some questions for the future. Italy: Genoa.Google Scholar
  70. Theobald, D. M. (2006). Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. In K. R. Crooks & M. Sanjayan (Eds.), Connectivity conservation (pp. 416–443). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Thill, J. C. (1999). GIS and multiple criteria decision making: A geographic information science perspective. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  72. Vogt, P., Riitters, K. H., Iwanowsky, M., Estreguil, C., Kozak, J., & Soille, P. (2007). Mapping landscape corridors. Ecological Indicators, 7, 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vuilleumier, S., & Prélaz-Droux, R. (2002). Map of ecological network for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu, F. (1998). SimLand: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and CA with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy set. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zucca, A., Sharifi, A., & Fabbri, A. (2007). Application of spatial multi criteria analysis to site selection for a local park: A case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 752–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning (DIST)Politecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations