Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 45–65 | Cite as

Mainstreaming sustainability into biodiversity conservation in Lesotho

  • André Pelser
  • Limpho Letsela
Article

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation is critical for the continued supply of ecosystem services to secure the sustainability of livelihoods, especially for poor rural people in developing countries. Current rates of biodiversity loss need to be curbed by using effective interventions and decision-making that again require timely information. Undertaking a community sustainability assessment to generate and structure this information for grassroots levels is critical for decision-making and actions. This paper presents insights from a community sustainability assessment initiative undertaken in Lesotho within a trans-boundary project area known as the Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Project. A qualitative case study approach was employed through a combination of several data collection techniques, including a literature review, field observations, key informant interviews, group discussions and key informant workshops. Study participants consisted of members of the community conservation forums from three districts that had been established by the project. Regarding progress towards the sustainability of biodiversity in the study area, the results indicated that current practices are unsustainable, more from the point of view of the socio-ecological components than the socio-cultural and spiritual or the socio-economic components. Consequently, there is a need to raise awareness at the community level and implement action plans to realize changes that support the sustainability of biodiversity in the long term.

Keywords

Sustainability assessment Stakeholder participation Biodiversity conservation Rural areas Sustainable development 

References

  1. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2003). Measuring sustainability: Learning from doing. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  2. Buselich, K. (2002). An outline of current thinking on sustainability assessment: A background paper prepared for the Western Australian State sustainability strategy. Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy, Murdoch University. http://www.sustainability.dpc.wa.gov.au/docs/BGPapers/KathrynBuselich.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2006.
  3. Caffyn, A., & Jobbins, G. (2003). Governance Capacity and Stakeholder Interactions in the Development and Management of Coastal Tourism: Examples from Morocco and Tunisia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(2&3), 224–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (1992). Convention text. http://biodiv.org/convention/articles.asp. Accessed 2 March 2005.
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2006a). Biodiversity in EIA and SEA. Background document to CBD decision VIII/28: Voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact Assessment. http://www.commissiemer.nl/ncea/pdfs/biodiversityeiasea.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2007.
  6. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2006b). Biodiversity in EIA and SEA. Background document to CBD decision VIII/28: Voluntary guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive impact assessment. http://www.commissiemer.nl/ncea/pdfs/biodiversityeiasea.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2007.
  7. Dalal-Clayton, B., & Bass, S., (2002). Sustainable development strategiesa resource book. London: Earthscan. http://www.nssd.net/res_book.html#contents. Accessed 25 March 2005.
  8. Dalal-Clayton, B., & Sadler, B. (2004). Sustainability appraisal: A review of international experience and practice. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). http://www.iied.org/Gov/spa/docs.html. Accessed 16 March 2006.
  9. Gibson, R. B. (2002). Specification of sustainability-based environmental assessment decision criteria and implications for determining “Significance” in environmental assessment. http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/015/0002/0009/index_e.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2006.
  10. Gibson, R. B., Hassan, S., Holtz, S., Tansey, J., & Whitelaw, G. (2005). Sustainability assessment: Criteria and processes. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  11. Global Ecovillage Network (GEN). (2000). Community sustainability assessment. http://gen.ecovillage.org/activities/csa/pdf/CSA-English.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2004.
  12. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA). (2005). Biodiversity in impact. http://www.iaia.org. Accessed 3 Aug 2006.
  13. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2002). Enabling the rural poor to overcome their poverty: Strategic framework for IFAD 2002–2006. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, N. (2006). Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, 26(1), 57–78. http://www.elservier.com/locate/eiar. Accessed 26 March 2006.
  15. Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Project (MDTP). (2006). Participatory Socio-economic baseline survey for the MDTP. Maseru: MDTP.Google Scholar
  16. MDTP. (2007a). Maloti Drakensberg Transfrontier conservation area–20 year strategy. Maseru: MDTP.Google Scholar
  17. MDTP. (2007b). Spatial assessment of biodiversity priorities in the Lesotho highlands. Maseru: MDTP.Google Scholar
  18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Current states and trends (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: World Resources Institute: http://www.millenniumassessment.org. Accessed 16 March 2006.
  19. ODPM. (2004b). Sustainability appraisal of regional spatial strategies and local development frameworks. Consultation Paper. London: ODPM Publications. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/142520.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2006.
  20. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister London (ODPM). (2004a). Sustainability appraisal of regional spatial strategies and local development documents. Guidance for regional planning bodies and local planning authorities. London: ODPM Publications. http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/142520.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2006.
  21. Pope, J., Annandale, D., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2004). Conceptualizing sustainability assessment. Environmental impact assessment review, 24(6), 595–616. http://www.elservier.com/locate/eiar. Accessed 30 May 2005.
  22. Population Reference Bureau (PRB). (2010). World population data sheet. Washington: PRB.Google Scholar
  23. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. (1971). http://www.ramsar.org. Accessed 20 March 2005.
  24. Ravetz, J. (2000). Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(1), 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA). (2003). A communications strategy for the engagement of local communities and civil society in environmental assessments in Southern Africa. Windhoek, Namibia: SAIEA.Google Scholar
  26. Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA). (2005a). A guide for opportunities for public participation in environmental assessment processes in the Southern African development community. Windhoek, Namibia: SAIEA.Google Scholar
  27. Southern African Institute for Environmental Assessment (SAIEA). (2005b). A one step participation guide: A handbook for public participation in environmental assessment in Southern Africa. Prepared by Common-ground Consultants. Calabash project—SAIEA. Windhoek, Namibia: SAIEA.Google Scholar
  28. Turnpenny, J. (2008). Are we nearly there yet? Lessons for integrated sustainability assessment from EU environmental policy-making. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 3(1/2), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UNDP, UNEP, World Bank, & WRI. (2000). World resources 2000–2001: People and ecosystems: The fraying web of life. Washington: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  30. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2003). UNEP Initiative on capacity building for integrated assessment and planning for sustainable development. http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/Events2003/pdf/initiative.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2006.
  31. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2004a). Integrated assessment and planning for sustainable development. Guidelines for pilot projects, Version 1. http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/Events2005/midTermReview/IAPGuidePilPro.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2006.
  32. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2004b). Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: Towards an integrated approach. http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/textONUBr.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2006.
  33. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2006). Towards an integrated international framework for integrated Assessment/Sustainability Appraisal (IA/SA)—a concept note. http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/Events2005/pdf/Concept%20Note.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2007.
  34. Wiek, A, & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision making- a sustainability assessment tool for city regions. Environmental impact assessment review, 25(6), 589–608. http://www.elservier.com/locate/eiar. Accessed 16 March 2006.
  35. World Resources Institute (WRI), UNDP, UNEP & World Bank. (2005). A guide to World Resources: The wealth of the poor—managing ecosystems to fight poverty. http://www.wri.org. Accessed 5 March 2006.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental ManagementUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations