Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 51–69 | Cite as

Multiscale Methodological Framework to Derive Criteria and Indicators for Sustainability Evaluation of Peasant Natural Resource Management Systems

  • S. lópez-ridaura
  • H. Van. Keulen
  • M. K. van. Ittersum
  • P. A. Leffelaar
Article

Abstract

Design and implementation of more sustainable natural resource management systems is the current objective of many research institutions, development agencies, NGOs and other stakeholders. But, how to assess whether a system is sustainable? How do we know whether the alternatives designed will increase the sustainability of the system? How to evaluate or assess the sustainability of natural resource management systems?

In this paper we present a multiscale methodological framework for sustainability evaluation. The framework is based on a systems approach from which five general attributes of sustainable natural resource management systems are defined based on scale- and discipline-independent properties (productivity, stability, resilience, reliability and adaptability).

A general operational strategy to derive ‘site-specific’ criteria and indicators for the attributes at different scales is also presented. This strategy is based on the definition of ‘impact scales’, at which the different stakeholders can or want to design alternatives, as well as the main stakeholders’ objectives and constraints. The application of the multiscale framework is illustrated with a case study in the Purhepecha Region of Michoacán, a peasant mountainous region in the west of Mexico. We used stakeholder consultation to identify the main objectives and constraints as well as to select criteria and indicators. The sets of criteria and indicators suggested for the different scales of analysis of the Purhepecha Region are comprehensive, yet not exhaustive, and represent the main issues related to natural resource management in the region. Further work will be directed towards the quantification of indicators at different scales and their relationships and trade-offs.

Keywords

adaptability attributes Mexico peasant agriculture productivity resilience stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreoli, M., Tellarini, V. 2000‘Farm sustainability evaluation: Methodology and practice’Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment774352Google Scholar
  2. Bakkes, J.A., Born, G.J., Helder, J.C., Swart, R.J., Hope, C.W., Parkerm, J.D.E. 1994An Overview of Environmental Indicators: State of the Art and PerspectivesUNEP/RIVMNairobiGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier, B. 2001‘Agricultural production and erosion in a small watershed in Honduras: A non-linear programming approach’Heerink, N.Keulen, H.Kuiper, M. eds. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. Recent Advances in Quantitative Analysis for Developing CountriesPhysica VerlagHeidelberg199209Google Scholar
  4. Bockstaller, C., Girardin, P., Werf, H.M.G. 1997‘Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems’European Journal of Agronomy7261270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bossel, H. 2000‘Policy assessment and simulation of actor orientation for sustainable development’Ecological Economics34337355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosshard, A. 2000‘A methodology and terminology of sustainability and its perspectives for rural planning’Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment772941Google Scholar
  7. Brookfield, H. 2001Exploring AgrodiversityColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Capillon, A., Genevieve, D. 2000‘Framework for diagnosis of the sustainability of agriculture, from the plot up to the regional level’Doppler, W.Calatrava, J. eds. Technical and Social Systems Approaches for Sustainable Rural DevelopmentMargraf VerlagGermany124128Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, R. 1994Challenging the Professions: Frontiers for Rural DevelopmentIntermediate Technology PublicationsLondonGoogle Scholar
  10. CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research)1999The Criteria & Indicators Toolbox SeriesCIFORJakartaGoogle Scholar
  11. Collison, M. 1983Farm Management in Peasant AgricultureWestview PressBoulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  12. Conway, G.R. 1994‘Sustainability in agricultural development: Trade-offs between productivity, stability, and equitability’Journal for Farming Systems Research-Extensions4114Num: 2Google Scholar
  13. Deybe, D. 2001‘Effects of economic policies on farmers, consumers and soil degradation: A recursively dynamic sector model with an application to Burkina Faso’Heerink, N.Keulen, H.Kuiper, M. eds. Economic Policy and Sustainable Land Use. Recent Advances in Quantitative Analysis for Developing CountriesPhysica VerlagHeidelberg239253Google Scholar
  14. Dumanski, J.: 1994. ‘Sustainable Land Management for the 21st Century’. in International Workshop on Sustainable Land Management for the 21st Century, Vol. 2: Plenary Papers. Alberta, Canada: The University of Lethbridge – Agricultural Institute of CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Fresco, L.O., Kroonenberg, S.B. 1992‘Time and spatial scales in ecological sustainability’Land Use Policy9155168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garibay, C.Velazquez, P.Palacios, M.Alcocer, G. eds. 1998Programa de Desarrollo Regional de la Meseta PurhepechaSEMARMAP-PNUD-INI-PAIRMexicoGoogle Scholar
  17. Gérard, F., Boussard, J.-M. and Deybe, D. 1995. ‘MATA: un outil d’analyse multi-niveaux pour le secteur agricole’, in Comportement micro-économique dans les pays en voie de développement. Collection Actualité Scientifique, Paris, Aupelf-Uref, pp. 347–364.Google Scholar
  18. Hengsdijk, H., Kruseman, G. 1993Operationalizing the DLV program: An integrated agro-economic and agro-ecological approach to a methodology for analysis of sustainable land use and regional agricultural policyAB-DLO/Department Development EconomicsWageningen.DLV Report No. 1Google Scholar
  19. Herrera, J.L., Odenthal, J., Cira, J., Ramirez, P. 1999Propuestas para el desarrollo de un modelo de agricultura sustentable en la Cuenca del Lago de PatzcuaroCESSE-SIJMM-CONACYTMexicoGoogle Scholar
  20. Holling, C.S. 1973‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ICSA (Interamerican Council for Sustainable Agriculture)1996Seeds for the Future. Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources in the AmericasInteramerican Council for Sustainable AgricultureMexicoGoogle Scholar
  22. INI (Instituto Nacional Indigenista)1998Perfil indigena de MexicoINIMexicoGoogle Scholar
  23. IUCN-IDRC (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources – International Development Research Centre)1995‘Assessing progress towards sustainability: A new approach’Trzyna, T.C. eds. A Sustainable World: Defining and Measuring Sustainable DevelopmentIUCN/ICEPCalifornia152172Google Scholar
  24. Kessler, J.J. 1997Strategic environmental analysis (SEAN). A Framework for Planning and Integration of Environmental Care in Development Policies and InterventionsAIDEnvironment Advice, and research in for Development and EnvironmentThe Netherlands.Google Scholar
  25. Kruseman, G., Hengsdijk, H., Ruben, R. 1993Disentangling the concept of sustainability: Conceptual definitions, analytical framework and operational techniques in sustainable land useCABO-DLO/Department of Development EconomicsWageningenDLV Report No. 2Google Scholar
  26. Kuik, O.J., Verbruggen, H. 1991In Search of Indicators of Sustainable DevelopmentKluwerDordrechtGoogle Scholar
  27. Lele, S. 1998‘Resilience, sustainability, and environmentalism’Environment and Development Economics3249254Google Scholar
  28. Lopez-Ridaura, S., Masera, O., Astier, M. 2002‘Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systemsThe MESMIS framework’. Ecological Indicators2135148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Masera, O., Astier, M., Lopez-Ridaura, S. 1999Sustentabilidad y manejo de recursos naturales. El marco de evlauacion MESMISMundiPrensa-GIRAMexicoGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell, G., May, A., McDonald, A. 1995‘PICABUE: A methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development’International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology2104123Google Scholar
  31. Morse, S., McNamara, N., Acholo, M., Okwoli, B. 2000Visions of Sustainability. Stakeholders, Change and IndicatorsAshgate Publishing LtdEnglandGoogle Scholar
  32. Nambiar, K.K.M., Gupta, A.P., Fu, Q.L., Li, S. 2001‘Biophysical, chemical and socio-economic indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability in the Chinese coastal zone’Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment87209214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noy-Meir, I. 1975‘Stability and grazing systems: An application of predator–prey graphs’Journal of Ecology63459481Google Scholar
  34. Odum, H.T. 1994Ecological and General Systems. An Introduction to Systems EcologyUniversity Press of ColoradoColoradoGoogle Scholar
  35. Perrings, C. 1998‘Resilience and sustainability’Environment and Development Economics3221222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pimm, S.L. 1984‘The complexity and stability of ecosystems’Nature307321326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reijntjes, C., Haverkort, B., Waters-Bayer, A. 1992Farming for the Future: An Introduction to Low-external Input and Sustainable AgricultureMacMillan–ILEIALondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., Burton, M. 2001‘Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice’Ecological Economics39463478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosset, P. 2001Genetic Engineering of Food Crops for the Third World: An Appropriate Response to Poverty, Hunger and Lagging Productivity?Food First-Institute for Food and DevelopmentCaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossing, W.A.H., Jansma, J.E., De Ruijter, F.J., Schans, J. 1997‘Operationalizing sustainability: Exploring options for environmentally friendly flower bulb production systems’European Journal of Plant Pathology103217234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SAGARPA (Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentacion)2001Michoacán. Anuario estadistico de la produccion agropecuario, forestal y pesquera 1999SAGARPA-SEDAGRO-Alianza para el campoMexicoGoogle Scholar
  42. Schipper, R.A., Bouman, B.A.M., Jansen, H.G.P., Hengsdijk, H., Nieuwenhuyse, A. 2000‘Integrated biophysical and socio-economic analysis of regional land use’Bouman, B.A.M.Jansen, H.G.P.Schipper, R.A.Hengsdijk, H.Nieuwenhuyse, A. eds. Tools for Land Use Analysis on Different Scales: With Case Studies for Costa RicaKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht115144Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A.J., Dumanski, J. 1994FESLM: An International Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Land ManagementFAORomeWorld Soil Resources Report No. 73Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, D.C., Abidin, M.Z., Nasir, S.M., Ghazali, M.M., Chiew, E.F.C. 1993‘Creating a farmer sustainability index: A Malaysian case study’American Journal of Alternative Agriculture84175184Google Scholar
  45. Toledo, V.M., Alvarez-Icaza, P., Avila, P. 1992Plan Patzcuaro 2000. Investigacion multidisciplinaria para el desarrollo sostenidoFriedrich Ebert StiftungMexicoGoogle Scholar
  46. Torquebiau, E. 1989‘Sustainability indicators in agroforestry: The example of homegardens’, Views and Issues on Agroforestry and SustainabilityICRAFNairobiGoogle Scholar
  47. Ittersum, M.K., Rabbinge, R., Latesteijn, H.C. 1998‘Exploratory land use studies and their role in strategic policy making’Agricultural Systems58309330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Ittersum, M.K., Roetter, R.P., van Keulen, H., de Ridder, N., Noah, C.T., Laborte, A.G., Aggarwal, P.K., Ismail, A.B. and Tawang, A.: 2004, ‘A systems network (SysNet) approach for interactively evaluating strategic land use options at sub-national scale in South and South-east Asia’, Land Use Policy (In press).Google Scholar
  49. Mansvelt, J.D., Lubbe, M.J. 1999Checklist for Sustainable Landscape ManagementElsevierThe NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  50. Noordwijk, M., Tomich, T.P., Verbist, B. 2001‘Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins’Conservation Ecology521[online]Google Scholar
  51. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development): (1987), Our Common Future (Bruntland Report), Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. lópez-ridaura
    • 1
  • H. Van. Keulen
    • 1
  • M. K. van. Ittersum
    • 1
  • P. A. Leffelaar
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Production SystemsWageningen UniversityAK WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations