Abstract
The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was configured to simulate streamflow under data scarcity scenario for a snow-dominated, forested, mountainous Mago River basin located in the Eastern Himalayan region of India. To account for the role played by snowmelt dynamics on streamflow and its influence on water balance components of the basin, two separate projects were set up: a Reference project in which only hydrological parameters related to streamflow were considered without regard to snow-related parameters, elevation bands, and associated lapse rates and another project referred to as Elevation Band project in which 10 elevation bands were set up for six snow-dominated headwater sub-basins. Sensitivity analysis and calibration was performed using SWAT Calibration Uncertainty Programs/Sequential Uncertainty Fitting 2 for both the projects. The result of the sensitivity analysis showed that curve number (CN 2) was found to be most sensitive. The comparison between the two calibrated projects revealed that inclusion of snow-related parameters, elevation bands, and the associated lapse rates in the snow-dominated headwater catchments improved the hydrological simulation performance and this improvement propagated downstream towards the outlet of the basin. This enhancement highlighted the ability of SWAT to capture the snowmelt dynamics prevailing in the Eastern Himalayan region. Analysis of the water balance components showed that water yield and percolation increased, while evapotranspiration decreased under the effect of snow cover. The contribution of snowmelt runoff to the annual streamflow of the basin was about 8%, and the maximum contribution was made during the pre-monsoon period. This study also highlighted the importance of the presence of snow cover to sustain the ecosystem of the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The discharge data that support the findings of this study are available from the Central Water Commission (CWC), India. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. These data are available from the authors with the permission of CWC Headquarter, New Delhi. The meteorological data that support the findings of this study are openly available from CWC (precipitation, temperature, and relative humidity) and from SWAT website at https://swat.tamu.edu/software/india-dataset/ (wind velocity and solar radiation). The DEM data that support the findings of this study are openly available in SRTM 1 arc second global at https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/. The LULC data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the State Remote Sensing Application Centre, SRSAC, Itanagar. These data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. The soil map data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the State Land Use Board, Arunachal Pradesh. These data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
References
Abbaspour, K. C. (2008). SWAT-CUP2: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs—a user manual. Duebendorf: Department of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), Eawag. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
Abbaspour, K. C. (2011). Swat-Cup2: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs manual version 2 (p. 106). Duebendorf: Department of Systems Analysis, Integrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), Eawag. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
Abbaspour, K. C., Johnson, C. A., & van Genuchten, M. T. (2004). Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone Journal, 3(4), 1340–1352.
Abbaspour, K. C., Vaghefi, S. A., & Srinivasan, T. (2018). A guideline for successful calibration and uncertainity analysis for soil and water assessement: a review paper from the 2016 international SWAT conference. Water, 2018(10), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010006.
Anand, J., Gosain, A. K., Khosa, R., & Srinivasan, R. (2018). Regional scale hydrologic modeling for prediction of water balance, analysis of trends in stream flow and variations in stream flow. The case study of the Ganga River basin. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 16, 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.02.007.
Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M., & Bernhardt, G. (1993). A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology, 142, 47–69.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998). Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 73–89.
Bandyopadhyay, A., Bhadra, A., Maza, M., & Shelina, R. K. (2014). Monthly variations of air temperature lapse rates in Arunachal Himalaya. Journal of Indian Water Resources Society, 34(3), 16–25.
Barry, R. G. (1992). Mountain weather and climate (2nd ed.pp. 239–243). New York: Routledge.
Chiphang, N., Mishra, P., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Bhadra, A. (2017). Temporal variation in snow albedo at glaciated upper elevation zone of an Eastern Himalayan river basin. In N. C. Pant, R. Ravindra, D. Srivastava, & L. G. Thompson (Eds.), The Himalayan cryosphere: past and present. London, Special Publication, 462. First published online September 28, 2017: Geological Society. https://doi.org/10.1144/SSP462.8.
Debele, B., Srinivasan, R., Gosain, A., & K. (2010). Comparison of process-based and temperature-index snowmelt modeling in SWAT. Water Resources Management, 24, 1065–1088.
Dhami, B., Himanshu, S. K., Pandey, A., & Gautam, A. K. (2018). Evaluation of the SWAT model for water balance study of a mountainous snow fed river basin of Nepal. Environment and Earth Science, 77, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7210-8.
Fontaine, T. A., Cruickshank, T. S., Arnold, J. G., & Hotchkiss, R. H. (2002). Development of a snowfall–snowmelt routine for mountainous terrain for the soil water assessment tool (SWAT). Journal of Hydrology, 262(1–4), 209–223.
Gao, X., Chen, X., Biggs, T. W., & Yao, H. (2018). Separating wet and dry years to improve calibration of SWAT in Barrett watershed, Southern California. Water, 10(3), 274.
Grusson, Y., Sun, X., Gascoin, S., Sauvage, S., Raghavan, S., Anctil, F., & Pérez, J. M. S. (2015). Assessing the capability of the SWAT model to simulate snow, snow melt and streamflow dynamics over an alpine watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 531(Part 3), 574–588.
Huber, W. C., and Dickinson, R. E. (1988). Storm water management model user’s manual, version 4.0: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 569 p.
Hunsaker, C. T., Whitaker, T. W., & Bales, R. C. (2012). Snowmelt runoff and water yield along elevation and temperature gradients in California’s southern Sierra Nevada. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48(4), 667–678.
Kang, K., Lee, J., & H. (2014). Hydrologic modelling of the effect of snowmelt and temperature on a mountainous watershed. Journal of Earth System Science, 123(4), 705–713.
Khan, A. J., & Koch, M. (2018). Correction and informed regionalization of precipitation data in a high mountainous region (Upper Indus Basin) and its effect on SWAT-modelled discharge. Water, 2018(10), 1557.
Luo, Y., Arnold, J., Liu, S., Wang, X., & Chen, X. (2013). Inclusion of glacier processes for distributed hydrological modeling at basin scale with application to a watershed in Tianshan Mountains, Northwest China. Journal of Hydrology, 477, 72–85.
Monteith, J. L. (1965). Evaporation and the environment. p. 205–234. In The state and movement of water in living organism, XIXth Symposium. Soc. For Exp. Biol., Swansea, Cambridge University Press.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Binger, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., & Sutchiffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., & Williams, J. R. (2001). Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) theoretical documentation (p. 781). Temple: Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Omani, N., Srinivasan, R., Smith, P. K., & Karthikeyan, R. (2017). Glacier mass balance simulation using SWAT distributed snow algorithm. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62(4), 546–560.
Srivastava, P. C. (2000). Soils of Arunachal Pradesh. SLUB Publ. 18, State Land Use Board, Naharlagun-791110 86 + one sheet of soil map.
USDA Soil Conservation Service. (1972). National engineering handbook, Section 4: Hydrology, Chapters 4–10, Washington, DC., 15-7–15-11.
Viviroli, D., Archer, D. R., Buytaert, W., Fowler, H. J., Greenwood, G. B., Hamlet, A. F., Huang, Y., Koboltschnig, G., Litaor, M. I., Lopez-Moreno, J. I., Lorentz, S., Schädler, B., Schreier, H., Schwaiger, K., Vuille, M., & Woods, R. (2011). Climate change and mountain water resources: overview and recommendations for research, management and policy. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 471–504. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-471-2011.
Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K. C., Xia, J., & Yang, H. (2008). Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe basin in China. Journal of Hydrology, 358(1–2), 14–23.
Zhang, Y., Luo, Y., Sun, L., Liu, S., Chen, X., & Wang, X. (2016). Using glacier area ratio to quantify effects of melt water on runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 269–277.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the help and encouragement provided by the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, and express sincere thanks to the Central Water Commission (Itanagar) for providing the data for use in this study.
Funding
This study received financial support provided by the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, through Grant No. EMR/2016/005189.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiphang, N., Bandyopadhyay, A. & Bhadra, A. Assessing the Effects of Snowmelt Dynamics on Streamflow and Water Balance Components in an Eastern Himalayan River Basin Using SWAT Model. Environ Model Assess 25, 861–883 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09716-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09716-8