Confronting Management Challenges in Highly Uncertain Natural Resource Systems: a Robustness–Vulnerability Trade-off Approach
This paper presents a framework for the study of policy implementation in highly uncertain natural resource systems in which uncertainty cannot be characterized by probability distributions. We apply the framework to parametric uncertainty in the traditional Gordon–Schaefer model of a fishery to illustrate how performance can be sacrificed (traded-off) for reduced sensitivity and hence increased robustness, with respect to model parameter uncertainty. With sufficient data, our robustness–vulnerability analysis provides tools to discuss policy options. When less data are available, it can be used to inform the early stages of a learning process. Several key insights emerge from this analysis: (1) the classic optimal control policy can be very sensitive to parametric uncertainty, (2) even mild robustness properties are difficult to achieve for the simple Gordon–Schaefer model, and (3) achieving increased robustness with respect to some parameters (e.g., biological parameters) necessarily results in increased sensitivity (decreased robustness) with respect to other parameters (e.g., economic parameters). We thus illustrate fundamental robustness–vulnerability trade-offs and the limits to robust natural resource management. Finally, we use the framework to explore the effects of infrequent sampling and delays on policy performance.
KeywordsResource management Uncertainty Robust control Policy implementation Learning Vulnerability
The authors would like to thank Elinor Ostrom, William Brock, Charles Perrings, and Ann Kinzig for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
- 1.Abaunza, P., Celso Fariña, A., & Murta, A. (2003). Applying biomass dynamic models to the southern horse mackerel stock (Atlantic Waters of Iberian Peninsula). A comparison with VPA-based methods. Scientia Marina, 67(Suppl. 1), 291–300.Google Scholar
- 4.Babonneau, F., Vial, J. P., & Apparigliato, R. (2010). Robust optimization for environmental and energy planning. In J. A. Filar, & A. Haurie (Eds.), Uncertainty and environmental decision making. International series in operations research & management science (Vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 79–126). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 7.Ben-Tal, A., El-Ghaoui L., & Nemirovski, A. (2000). Robust semidefinite programming. In R. Saigal, L. Vandenberghe, & H. Wolkowicz (Eds.), Semidefinite programming and applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- 11.Bode, H. W. (1945). Network analysis and feedback amplifier design. Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
- 14.Clark, C. (2006). The worldwide crisis in fisheries: Economic models and human behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Clark, C. W. (1990). Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 20.Hansen, L. P., & Sargent, T. J. (2007). Robustness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 23.Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems, local surprise and global change. In Clark, W. C., & Munn, R. E. (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 24.Holling, C. S., & Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In L. H. Gunderson, & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature (Chap. 2). Washington, DC: Island.Google Scholar
- 26.ISRIC (1990). Global assessment of the status of human induced soil degradation (glasdod). Dataset. Wageningen: International Soil Reference and Information Centre.Google Scholar
- 32.Luce, D. R., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 33.Ludwig, D., Walker, B., & Holling, C. S. (1997). Sustainability, stability, and resilience. Conservation Ecology, 1(1), URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art7/.
- 35.Moran, E. F., & Ostrom, E. (Eds.) (2006). Seeing the forest and the trees: Human–environment interactions in forest ecosystems. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
- 37.Rodriguez, A. A. (2003). Analysis and design of feedback control systems. Tempe: Control3D, LLC.Google Scholar
- 38.Rodriguez, A. A. (2004). Analysis and design of multivariable feedback control systems. Tempe: Control3D, LLC.Google Scholar
- 39.Schaefer, M. (1957). Some considerations of population dynamics and economics in relation to the management of the commercial marine fisheries. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 14(5), 669–681.Google Scholar
- 41.Shah, T., Molden, D., Sakthivadivel, R., & Seckler, D. (2000). The global groundwater situation: Overview of opportunities and challenges. Tech. rep., International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
- 43.Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- 47.Zhou, K., & Doyle, J. (1998). Essentials of robust control. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar