Advertisement

Environmental Modeling & Assessment

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 549–567 | Cite as

A Time-Dependent System for Evaluating Groundwater Contamination Hazard Rating of Municipal Solid Waste Dumps

  • Raj Kumar Singh
  • Manoj Datta
  • Arvind Kumar Nema
Article

Abstract

In developing countries, several old municipal solid waste dumps (unlined landfills) exist adjacent to large cities, releasing contaminants to the underlying aquifer, thus posing the hazard of groundwater contamination. These uncontrolled waste dumps need to be prioritized in terms of the groundwater contamination hazard posed by them, so that necessary control and remedial measures can be undertaken in a phased manner. This paper presents a time-dependent system for evaluating groundwater contamination hazard rating of municipal solid waste dumps. The system is based on source–pathway–receptor relationships and evaluates the relative value of hazard posed by a site over its entire leaching life, on a scale of 0–1,000. The system parameters have been selected based on literature and expert opinions. The Delphi technique is used to derive the relative importance weights of the system parameters. The proposed system is compared with six selected existing hazard rating systems. The comparison, made by way of score range analysis, shows that the proposed system exhibits a much wider range of hazard scores for various scenarios of site conditions, and hence the proposed system is more sensitive to varied site conditions. The application of different systems to six municipal solid waste dumps located in four cities of India shows that, whereas the existing systems individually produce clustered scores and return the same rank to more than one site, the proposed system produces significantly varying scores and return different ranks to different sites. This demonstrates that the proposed system improves decision making and makes a better basis for prioritization of municipal solid waste dumps for adopting control and remedial measures.

Keywords

Municipal Solid Waste Dumps Source–Pathway–Receptor Groundwater Contamination Hazard Scores Hazard Rating Systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank M/s Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited, New Delhi, and the Commission of European Union for supporting the Ph.D. studies of the first author, of which the present paper is a part.

References

  1. 1.
    Asolekar, S. R. (2003). Siting of municipal solid waste processing and landfilling facility. Final Report to Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagchi, A. (2004). Design of landfills and integrated solid waste management. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belvi, H., & Baccini, P. (1989). Long-term behavior of municipal solid waste landfills. Waste Management & Research, 7, 43–56.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blight, G. E. (2005). Consequences of raising the height of a landfill in a water-deficient climate. Waste Management, 25, 1021–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Canadian Council of Ministers for the Environment. (1992). National Classification System for Contaminated Sites. Report CCME EPC-CS39E, March 1992, Winnipeg, Canada.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canter, L. W. (1996). Environmental impact assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chian, S. K., & DeWalle, F. B. (1976). Sanitary landfill leachates and their treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 102, 411–431.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christensen, T. H., & Kjeldsen, P. (1989). Basic biochemical processes in landfills. Chapter 2.1. In T. H. Christensen, R. Cossu, & R. Stegmann (Eds.), Sanitary landfilling: Process, technology and environmental impact. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chu, L. M., Cheung, K. C., & Wong, M. H. (1994). Variations in chemical properties of landfill leachate. Environmental Management, 18, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DOE. (1996). National Corrective Action Prioritization System (NCAPS), US Department of Energy, Office of Pollution Prevention and Resource Conservation Policy and Guidance, RCRA Information Brief EH-413-070/1296 [December 1996 (updated 3/97)].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Fadel, M., Bou-Zeid, E., Chahine, W., & Alayli, B. (2002). Temporal variation of leachate quality from pre-sorted and baled municipal solid waste with high organic and moisture content. Waste Management, 22, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Fadel, M., Findikankis, A. N., & Leckie, J. O. (1997). Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. Journal of Environmental Management, 50, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Farquhar, G. J. (1989). Leachate: Production and characterization. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 16, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fatta, D., Papadopoulos, A., & Loizidou, M. (1999). A study on the landfill leachate and its impact on the groundwater quality of the greater area. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 21, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Golder Associates. (1996). LandSim-Groundwater risk assessment tool for landfill design. http://www.landsim.com. Accessed 22 April 2007.
  16. 16.
    Golder Associates (NZ) Ltd. (2002). Risk assessment for small closed landfills. Report for the Ministry for Environment under the Sustainable Management Fund, New Zealand. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/withyou/funding/smf/results/4176_final_report.pdf. Accessed 23 December 2007.
  17. 17.
    Gonullu, M. T. (1994). Analytical modeling of organic contaminants in leachate. Waste Management & Research, 12, 141–150.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonullu, M. T. (1994). Analytical modeling of inorganic contaminants in leachate. Waste Management & Research, 12, 339–350.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hagemeister, M. E., Jones, D. D., & Woldt, W. E. (1996). Hazard ranking of landfills using fuzzy composite programming. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122, 248–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jang, Y., & Townsend, G. T. (2003). Effect of waste depth on leachate quality from laboratory construction and demolition debris landfills. Environmental Engineering Science, 20, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones-Lee, A., & Lee, G. F. (2000). Appropriate use of MSW leachate recycling in municipal solid waste landfilling. In Proceedings Air and Waste Management Association 93rd national annual meeting CD ROM paper 00-455 Pittsburg, PA June (2000).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joseph, K., Esakku, S., Nagendran, R., & Vishwanathan, C. (2005). A decision making tool for dumpsite rehabilitation in developing countries. In Proceedings of Sardinia 2005, Tenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 3–7 October, Cagliari, Italy.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelly, E. (1976). Groundwater pollution near a landfill. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 102, 1189–1199.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khanbilvardi, R. M., Ahmed, S., & Gleason, P. J. (1995). Flow investigation for landfill leachate (FILL). Journal of Environmental Engineering, 121, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kouzeli-Katsiri, A., Bosdogianni, A., & Chirstoulas, D. (1999). Prediction of leachate quality from sanitary landfills. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 125, 950–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kylefors, K. (2002). Prediction of leaching from municipal solid waste (SWM) and measures to improve leachate management at landfills. Doctoral Thesis submitted to Department of Environmental Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kylefors, K., Andreas, L., & Lagerkvist, A. (2003). A comparison of small-scale, pilot-scale and large-scale tests for predicting leaching behaviour of land filled wastes. Waste Management, 23, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, N., Kusuda, T., Shimaoka, T., Matsufuji, Y., & Hanashima, M. (1994). Pollutant transformations in landfill layers. Waste Management & Research, 12, 33–48.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    LeGrand, H. E. (1964). System for evaluation of contamination potential of some waste disposal sites. Journal of American Water Works Association, 56, 959–974.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marsh, G. M., & Day, R. (1991). A model standardized risk assessment protocol for use with hazardous waste sites. Environment Health Prospective, 90, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McFarlane, D. S., Cherry, J. A., Gilham, R. W., & Sudicky, E. A. (1983). Migration of contaminants in groundwater at a landfill: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 63, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ministry for the Environment. (2004). Risk screening system, contaminated land management guidelines no. 3. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand. www.mfe.govt.nz. Accessed 11 October 2007.
  33. 33.
    Ministry of Environment & Forest. (2000). Municipal solid wastes (handling and management) rules. New Delhi: The Gazette of India.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mor, S., Ravindra, K., Dahiya, R. P., & Chandra, A. (2006). Leachate characterization and assessment of groundwater pollution near municipal solid waste landfill site. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 118, 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    National Productivity Council (2003). Hazard potential rating of existing municipal solid waste dump sites. A report prepared for Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    National Research Council. (1994). Ranking hazardous-waste sites for remedial action. National Academic Press. http://www.edu/books0309050928/html/index.html. Accessed 22 April 2007.
  37. 37.
    Phillips, C. R., & Nathwani, J. S. (1977). Development of a soil–waste interaction matrix for assessing land disposal of industrial wastes. Water Research, 11, 859–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Qasim, S. R., & Burchinal, J. C. (1970). Leaching from simulated landfills. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 43, 371–379.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Qasim, S. R., & Chiang, W. (1994). Sanitary landfill leachate: Generation: Control and treatment. Florida: CRC.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Raveh, A., & Avnimelech, Y. (1979). Leaching of pollutants from sanitary landfill models. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 51, 2705–2716.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Reinhart, D. R., & Grosh, C. J. (1998). Analysis of Florida MSW landfill leachate quality. A report submitted to University of Central Florida, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department. http://www.hinkleycenter.com/publications/analysis_florida_msw_leachate_97-3.pdf. Accessed 21 January 2007.
  42. 42.
    Reitzel, S., Farquahar, G., & McBean, E. A. (1992). Temporal characterization of municipal solid waste leachate. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 8, 756–767.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schroeder, P. R., Lloyd, C. M., Zappi, P. A., & Aziz, N. M. (1994). The Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) model: User’s guide for version 3. EPA/600/R-94/168a. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Science Applications International Corporation (1990). Washington ranking method scoring manual. Prepared for Washington State Department of Ecology, Toxics Cleanup Program, Olympia, Washington.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sharma, H. D., & Lewis, S. P. (1994). Waste containment systems, waste stabilization, and landfill design and evaluation. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Singh, R. K. (2008). Groundwater contamination hazard rating system for municipal solid waste dumps and landfills. Ph.D. Thesis submitted to Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Singh, R. K., Datta, M., & Nema, A. K. (2010). Review of groundwater contamination hazard rating systems for old landfills. Waste Management & Research, 28, 97–108. doi: 10.1177/07734242X09103816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Singh, R. K., Datta, M., & Nema, A. K. (2009). A new system for groundwater contamination hazard rating of landfills. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 344–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Solid Waste Management Board. (2001). Indiana scoring model, Indiana administrative code (solid waste management; 329 IAC 7-1-1, readopted filed 2001: 24 IR 1535). http://www.in.gov/legislative/iac/T03290/A00070. Accessed 30 June 2007.
  51. 51.
    Srivastava, S. K., & Ramanathan, A. L. (2008). Geochemical assessment of groundwater quality in vicinity of Bhalswa landfill, Delhi, India, using graphical and multivariate statistical methods. Environmental Geology, 53, 1509–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Statom, R., Thine, G. D., & McCray, J. E. (2004). Temporal changes in leachate chemistry of a municipal solid waste landfill cell in Florida, USA. Environmental Geology, 45, 982–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Straub, W. A., & Lynch, D. R. (1982). Models of landfill leaching: Moisture flow and inorganic strength. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 108, 231–250.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Straub, W. A., & Lynch, D. R. (1982). Models of landfill leaching: Organic strength. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 108, 251–268.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    USEPA. (1990). Hazard ranking system, final rule December 14, 1990. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/hrsres/index.htm#HRS%20Rule. Accessed 8 February 2006.
  56. 56.
    USEPA. (2003). EPA’s composite model for leachate migration with transformation products (EPACMTP). Technical background document. EPA530-R-03-006. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/industd/tools/cmtp/tbd_toc3.pdf. Accessed 26 December 2007.
  57. 57.
    USEPA. (2005). Criteria for municipal solid waste landfills. 40 CFR Part 258. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_05/40cfr258_05.html. Accessed 14 February 2007.
  58. 58.
    Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (2001). Site discovery, screening and ranking Chapter NR 710, Wisconsin administrative code, unofficial text, register, February, 2001, No. 542. http://www.legis.state.wi.us/rsb/code/nr/nr710.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2007.
  59. 59.
    Wu, J. S., & Hilger, H. (1984). Evaluation of EPA’s hazard ranking system. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 110, 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raj Kumar Singh
    • 1
  • Manoj Datta
    • 2
  • Arvind Kumar Nema
    • 3
  1. 1.Operations WingHousing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd.New DelhiIndia
  2. 2.PEC University of TechnologyChandigarhIndia
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations