Advertisement

Environmental Modeling & Assessment

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 251–259 | Cite as

A Conceptual Nitrate Transport Model and Its Application at Different Scales

  • Shuming Liu
  • Peter Tucker
  • Martin Mansell
Article

Abstract

Groundwater and surface water pollution from nonpoint sources are problems of increasing concern. Nitrate transport is a crucial part in the whole process of nitrate loss. Previous methods for simulating the nitrate transport process usually involved solving complex advection–dispersion equations and required large amount of parameters and input data, which makes a model application expensive or invalid in terms of computation and data availability. The aim of this research is to develop a simple conceptual method to simulate the nitrate transport. In this paper, a simple conceptual method utilizing the distribution of nitrate loss against cumulative drainage to simulate the nitrate transport process is introduced. The concept and construction of this method are presented, and its applicability at different spatial scales is demonstrated. Results of model application at laboratory, pilot, and catchment scales show that this method has a good capability to simulate the transport of nitrate. Impact of spatial scales on parameters’ values is also discussed. Compared to conventional methods, this method requires fewer parameters, less computing time, and less input data.

Keywords

Conceptual model Diffuse pollution Hydrograph Nitrate transport Unit nitrograph 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the CVCP for their financial support to this project and SEPA and Glasgow City Council for their help in sourcing data.

References

  1. 1.
    Addiscott, T. M., & Whitmore, A. P. (1991). Simulation of solute leaching in soil of differing permeabilities. Soil Use and Management, 7(2), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anthony, S., Quinn, P. F., & Lord, E. (1996). Catchment scale modelling of nitrate leaching. Aspects of Applied Biology, 46, 23–32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arheimer, B., & Brandt, M. (1998). Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden. Ambio, 27(6), 471–479.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Birkinshaw, S. L., & Ewen, J. (2000). Nitrogen transformation component for SHETRAN catchment nitrate transport modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 230, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christopher, W. C., & Wahl, M. (1997). Non-point source runoff modelling: A comparison of a forested watershed and an urban watershed on the south Carolina coast. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 213, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hornberger, G. M., Bencala, K. E., & McKnight, D. M. (1994). Hydrological controls on dissolved organic carbon during snowmelt in the Snake River near Montezuma, Colorado. Biogeochemistry, 25, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hutson, J. L. (1993). Applying one dimensional deterministic chemical fate models on a regional scale. Geoderma, 60, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnsson, H., Bergstron, L., & Jansson, P. (1988). Simulated nitrogen dynamics and losses in a layered agricultural soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 18, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jury, W. A. (1995). Stochastic solute transport modelling trends and their potential compatibility with GIS. Applications of GIS to the modelling of non-point source pollutants in the vadose zone. In Proceedings of Bouyoucos Conference, 1–3 May, Riverside, CA, USA, pp. 393–405.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenzi, M. A., & Luzio, M. D. (1997). Surface runoff, soil erosion and water quality modelling in the Alpone watershed using AGNPS integrated with a GIS. European Journal of Agronomy, 6, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, S., Brazier, R. E., & Heathwaite, A. L. (2005a). An investigation into the inputs controlling predictions from a diffuse phosphorus loss model for the UK: The Phosphorus Indicators Tool (PIT). Sci Total Environ, 344(1–3), 211–223.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, S., Tucker, P., Mansell, M., & Hursthouse, A. (2005b). Development and application of a catchment scale diffuse nitrate modelling tool. Hydrological Processes, 19, 2625–2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quinn, P. F., & Beven, K. (1993). Spatial and temporal predictions of soil moisture dynamics, runoff, variable source areas and evapotranspiration for Plynlimon, mid-Wales. Hydrological Processes, 7, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    SEPA. (1999). State of the environment report. Stirling: Scottish Environment Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaw, E. M. (1994). Hydrology in practice (3rd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Herpe, Y., Troch, P. A., Callewier, L., & Quinn, P. F. (1998). Application of a conceptual catchment scale nitrate transport model on two rural river basins. Environmental Pollution, 102, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, Q. J., Ward, A. D., Workman, S. R., & Salchow, E. M. (1997). Applying stochastic simulation techniques to a deterministic vadose zone solute transport model. Journal of Hydrology, 197, 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and EngineeringTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of The West of ScotlandPaisleyUK

Personalised recommendations