A mathematical model to estimate errors associated with closed flux chambers
- 103 Downloads
Errors associated with the closed flux chamber technique, used to measure surface emissions from landfills, were investigated by using a combination of numerical modeling and laboratory studies. A transient-state, advective–dispersive–reactive model was developed and used in conjunction with its steady-state version to quantify the errors associated with closed flux chambers. In developing the model, all four major gases, CH4, O2, CO2, and N2, and the oxidation of CH4 to CO2 were considered. Laboratory experiments were conducted on a monolayered as well as a two-layered landfill cover system to calibrate and verify the model. The model was used to develop a plot of the percentage errors associated with closed flux chambers of different dimensions and surface flux rates.
Keywordslandfills closed flux chambers numerical model surface emission laboratory investigation errors
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.A.D. Matthias, D.N. Yarger and R.S. Weinbeck, Geophys. Res. Lett. 5(9) (1978) 765–768.Google Scholar
- 8.C.W. Fetter, Contaminant Hydrogeology (Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
- 9.C. Zheng and G.D. Bennett, Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling, 2nd edn. (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 2002).Google Scholar
- 11.C.R. Wilke, J. Chem. Eng. Prog. (1950) 46(2) 95–104.Google Scholar
- 14.L.A.K. Perera, G. Achari and J.P.A. Hettiaratchi, ASCE J. Environ. Eng. (2002) May 461–471.Google Scholar
- 15.S.C. Chapra and R.P. Canale, Numerical Methods for Engineers with Programming and Software Applications, 3rd edn. (WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1998).Google Scholar
- 16.L.A.K. Perera, G. Achari and J.P.A. Hettiaratchi, J. Environ. Inform. 4(1) (2004) 11–27.Google Scholar
- 17.D.G.M. Senevirathna, G. Achari and J.P.A. Hettiaratchi, Can. J. Civ. Eng. (2006) (in press).Google Scholar