## Abstract

In this paper, we explore single-phase flow in pores with triangular cross-sections at the pore-scale level. We use analytic and asymptotic methods to calculate the hydraulic conductivity in triangular pores, a typical geometry used in network models of porous media flow. We present an analytical formula for hydraulic conductivity based on Poiseuille flow that can be used in network models contrasting the typical geometric approach leading to many different estimations of the hydraulic conductivity. We consider perturbations to an equilateral triangle by changing the length of one of the triangle sides. We look at both small and large triangles in order to capture triangles that are near and far from equilateral. In each case, the calculations are compared with numerical solutions and the corresponding network approximations. We show that the analytical solution reduces to a quantitatively justifiable formula and agrees well with the numerical solutions in both the near and far from equilateral cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

## References

- 1.
De Marsily G (1986) Quantitative hydrogeology. Tech. Rep., Paris School of Mines, Fontainebleau

- 2.
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12:513–522

- 3.
Scanlon BR, Mace RE, Barrett ME, Smith B (2003) Can we simulate regional groundwater flow in a Karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA. J Hydrol 276:137–158

- 4.
Khaled AR, Vafai K (2003) The role of porous media in modeling flow and heat transfer in biological tissues. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46:4989–5063

- 5.
Vafai K (2010) Porous media: applications in biological systems and biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton

- 6.
Vafai K (2015) Handbook of porous media. CRC Press, Boca Raton

- 7.
Vermeulen F, McGee B (2000) In-situ electromagnetic heating for hydrocarbon recovery and environmental remediation. J Can Petrol Technol 39:24–28

- 8.
Woodruff K, Miller D (2007) Newtown Creek/Greenpoint oil spill study. Tech. Rep., Lockheed Martin/REAC

- 9.
Lake LW, Venuto PB (1990) A niche for enhanced oil recovery in the 1990s. Oil Gas J 88(17):62–67

- 10.
Anderson RN (1998) Oil production in the 21st century. Sci Am 278(3):86–91

- 11.
Tørå G, Øren PE, Hansen A (2012) A dynamic network model for two-phase flow in porous media. Transp Porous media 92(1):145–164

- 12.
DallaValle JM (1948) Micrometrics: the technology of fine particles. Pitman, New York

- 13.
Kozeny J (1927) Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Royal Academy of Science, Vienna, Proc. Class I 136, pp 271–306

- 14.
Slichter CS (1899) The 19th Ann. Rep. US Geophys Survey, p. 304/319

- 15.
Smith WO (1932) Capillary flow through an ideal uniform soil. Physics 3:139–146

- 16.
Fatt I, Dykstra H (1951) Relative permeability studies. J Petrol Technol 3:249–256

- 17.
Gates JI, Lietz WT (1950) Relative permeabilities of California cores by the capillary-pressure method. In: Drilling and production practice. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC

- 18.
Purcell WR (1949) Capillary pressures—their measurement using mercury and the calculation of permeability therefrom. J Petrol Technol 1:39–48

- 19.
Fatt I (1956) The network model of porous media. OnePetro, Richardson

- 20.
Sahimi M (2011) Flow and transport in porous media and fractured rock: from classical methods to modern approaches. Wiley, Weinheim

- 21.
Gu Z, Bazant MZ (2019) Microscopic theory of capillary pressure hysteresis based on pore-space accessivity and radius-resolved saturation. Chem Eng Sci 196:225–246

- 22.
Chatzis I, Dullien F (1985) The modeling of mercury porosimetry and the relative permeability of mercury in sandstones using percolation theory. Int Chem Eng (US) 25(1):47–66

- 23.
Wilkinson D, Willemsen JF (1983) Invasion percolation: a new form of percolation theory. J Phys A Math Gen 16(14):3365–3376

- 24.
Meakin P, Tartakovsky AM (2009) Modeling and simulation of pore-scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media. Rev Geophys 47(3):1–47

- 25.
Buckley SE, Leverett MC (1942) Mechanism of fluid displacement in sands. Trans AIME 146(01):107–116

- 26.
Hassanizadeh SM, Gray WG (1990) Mechanics and thermodynamics of multiphase flow in porous media including interphase boundaries. Adv Water Resour 13:169–186

- 27.
Manwart C, Torquato S, Hilfer R (2000) Stochastic reconstruction of sandstones. Phys Rev E 62(1):893–899

- 28.
Okabe H, Blunt MJ (2005) Pore space reconstruction using multiple-point statistics. J Petrol Sci Eng 46(1–2):121–137

- 29.
Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys Rev 17(3):273–283

- 30.
Hassanizadeh SM, Celia MA, Dahle HK (2002) Dynamic effect in the capillary pressure–saturation relationship and its impacts on unsaturated flow. Vadose Zone J 1(1):38–57

- 31.
Beliaev AY, Hassanizadeh SM (2001) A theoretical model of hysteresis and dynamic effects in the capillary relation for two-phase flow in porous media. Transp Porous media 43(3):487–510

- 32.
Hilfer R (2006) Macroscopic capillarity and hysteresis for flow in porous media. Phys Rev E 73(1):016307

- 33.
Doster F, Zegeling P, Hilfer R (2010) Numerical solutions of a generalized theory for macroscopic capillarity. Phys Rev E 81(3):036307

- 34.
Patzek TW, Kristensen JG (2001) Shape factor correlations of hydraulic conductance in noncircular capillaries: II. Two-phase creeping flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 236(2):305–317

- 35.
Long L, Li Y, Dong M (2016) Liquid–liquid flow in irregular triangular capillaries under different wettabilities and various viscosity ratios. Transp Porous Media 115(1):79–100

- 36.
Whitaker S (1986) Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law. Transp Porous Media 1(1):3–25

- 37.
Panfilov M (2013) Macroscale models of flow through highly heterogeneous porous media, vol 16. Springer, Berlin

- 38.
Dullien FA (2012) Porous media: fluid transport and pore structure. Academic Press, San Diego

- 39.
Avraam DG, Payatakes AC (1995) Flow regimes and relative permeabilities during steady-state two-phase flow in porous media. J Fluid Mech 293:207–236

- 40.
Blunt MJ (2001) Flow in porous media—pore-network models and multiphase flow. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 6(3):197–207

- 41.
Van Marcke P, Verleye B, Carmeliet J, Roose D, Swennen R (2010) An improved pore network model for the computation of the saturated permeability of porous rock. Transp Porous Media 85(2):451–476

- 42.
Mehmani Y, Balhoff MT (2015) Mesoscale and hybrid models of fluid flow and solute transport. Rev Mineral Geochem 80(1):433–459

- 43.
Xu CY (1999) Climate change and hydrologic models: a review of existing gaps and recent research developments. Water Resour Manag 13(5):369–382

- 44.
Becker A, Nemec J (1987) Macroscale hydrologic models in support to climate research. In: The influence of climate change and climatic variability on the hydrologie regime and water resources, proceedings of the Vancouver symposium, August 1987. IAHS Publication No. 168, pp 431–445

- 45.
Moyles I, Wetton B (2015) Fingering phenomena in immiscible displacement in porous media flow. J Eng Math 90:83–104

- 46.
Al-Gharbi MS, Blunt MJ (2005) Dynamic network modeling of two-phase drainage in porous media. Phys Rev E 71(1):016308

- 47.
Dahle H, Celia M (1999) A dynamic network model for two phase immiscible flow. Comput Geosci 3:1–22

- 48.
Qin CZ, van Brummelen H (2019) A dynamic pore-network model for spontaneous imbibition in porous media. Adv Water Resour 133:103420

- 49.
Boussinesq J (1868) Mémoire sur l’influence des Frottements dans les Mouvements Réguliers des Fluids. J Math Pures Appl 13:377–424

- 50.
Proudman J (1914) IV. Notes on the motion of viscous liquids in channels. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 28:30–36

- 51.
Sparrow EM (1962) Laminar flow in isosceles triangular ducts. AIChE J 8(5):599–604

- 52.
Tamayol A, Bahrami M (2010) Laminar flow in microchannels with noncircular cross section. J Fluids Eng 132(11):111–201

- 53.
Shah RK (1975) Laminar flow friction and forced convection heat transfer in ducts of arbitrary geometry. Int J Heat Mass Transf 18(7–8):849

- 54.
Navardi S, Bhattacharya S, Azese M (2016) Analytical expression for velocity profiles and flow resistance in channels with a general class of noncircular cross sections. J Eng Math 99(1):103–118

- 55.
Shah RK, London AL (2014) Laminar flow forced convection in ducts: a source book for compact heat exchanger analytical data. Academic Press, London

- 56.
Kumar R, Kumar A (2016) Thermal and fluid dynamic characteristics of flow through triangular cross-sectional duct: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 61:123–140

- 57.
Jia P, Dong M, Dai L, Yao J (2007) Slow viscous flow through arbitrary triangular tubes and its application in modelling porous media flows. Transp Porous Media 74(2):153–167

- 58.
Nakamura H, Hiraoka S, Yamada I (1972) Laminar forced convection flow and heat transfer in arbitrary triangular ducts. Heat Transf Jpn Res 1:120–122

- 59.
Abdel-Wahed RM, Attia AE (1984) Fully developed laminar flow and heat transfer in an arbitrarily shaped triangular duct. Wärme-und Stoffübertragung 18(2):83–88

- 60.
Lekner J (2009) Flow with slip between coaxial cylinders and in an equilateral triangular pipe. Predict Form Perovskite Type Oxides 2(1):27–31

- 61.
Lekner J (2007) Viscous flow through pipes of various cross-sections. Eur J Phys 28(3):521–527

- 62.
Kurt N, Sezer M (2006) Solution of Dirichlet problem for a triangle region in terms of elliptic functions. Appl Math Comput 182:73–81

- 63.
Trefethen LN, Williams RJ (1986) Conformal mapping solution of Laplace’s equation on a polygon with oblique derivative boundary conditions. J Comput Appl Math 14(1–2):227–249

- 64.
Pinsky MA (1985) Completeness of the eigenfunctions of the equilateral triangle. SIAM J Math Anal 16(4):848–851

- 65.
McCartin BJ (2003) Eigenstructure of the equilateral triangle, part I: the Dirichlet problem. SIAM Rev 45(2):267–287

- 66.
Bazant MZ (2016) Exact solutions and physical analogies for unidirectional flows. Phys Rev Fluids 1:024001

- 67.
wikiHow (2019) How to measure water pressure. wikiHow. https://www.wikihow.com/Measure-Water-Pressure. Accessed 16 Nov 2020

- 68.
Bryant S, Blunt M (1992) Prediction of relative permeability in simple porous media. Phys Rev A 46(4):2004–2011

- 69.
Mason G, Morrow NR (1991) Capillary behavior of a perfectly wetting liquid in irregular triangular tubes. J Colloid Interface Sci 141(1):262–274

- 70.
Bruus H (2008) Theoretical microfluidics, vol 18. Oxford University Press, Oxford

- 71.
Bruus H (2011) Acoustofluidics 1: governing equations in microfluidics. Lab Chip 11(22):3742–3751

- 72.
Lekner J (2019) Laminar viscous flow through pipes, related to cross-sectional area and perimeter length. Am J Phys 87(10):791

- 73.
Darcy H (1856) Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon. Victor Dalmont, Paris

- 74.
Moffatt HK, Duffy BR (1980) Local similarity solutions and their limitations. J Fluid Mech 96(2):299–313

## Acknowledgements

L.M.K. acknowledges the financial support of Science Foundation Ireland under Grant No. SFI/13/IA/1923, the Mathematics Applications Consortium for Science and Industry under Grant No. 12/IA/1683, the Carswell Family Foundation, and an NSERC Vanier Canada Graduate scholarship Grant No. 434051. I.R.M. acknowledges The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant 2019-06337.

## Author information

### Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Appendix A: Separation of variables in triangular coordinates

### Appendix A: Separation of variables in triangular coordinates

Consider the eigenvalue problem

where W is the equilateral triangle domain given as in Fig. 18.

The problem with separation of variables in this domain is that the boundaries of the triangle are not constant in *x* or *y*. Transforming to a triangular coordinate system is useful as each point in space is measured relative to the bisectors of the angles through the midpoint of the opposite sides, with the origin being the centre of the inscribed circle of the triangle, with radius \(r_{\text {inc}} = {\sqrt{3}}/{6}\).

Considering Fig. 19, each point P in (*x*, *y*, *z*) is projected onto (*u*, *v*, *w*) in this new coordinate system, giving the following relations:

with positive orientation directed towards the boundary. Adding these three equations it can be seen that there is a linear dependence in the variables,

which is consistent with \({\mathbb {R}}^2\) being uniquely spanned by two vectors. Now, in this new coordinate system, the boundaries of the triangle are now \(u=r_{\text {inc}}\), \(v=r_{\text {inc}}\) and \(w=r_{\text {inc}}\), which are constant values and so allow us to proceed with separation of variables.

Rearranging the equations in (61) we see that

and so defining \(\xi = u\) and \(\eta =v-w\) provides a good orthogonal system. In this new coordinate system, the Laplace operator can be written as

and the system (60) becomes

subject to \(\phi = 0\) on \(\xi = r_{\text {inc}}\), \(\eta =u +2 r_{\text {inc}}\), and \(\eta = -u-2r_{\text {inc}}\). Seeking a separable solution of the form \(\phi (\xi ,\eta ) = f(\xi )g(\eta )\) and substituting this into (65) yields

Solutions to (66a) and (66b) are simple harmonic oscillators. We first consider the solution to (66a). The boundary condition to be satisfied is \(\phi = 0\) on \(\xi =r_{\text {inc}}\), but we need a second boundary condition. Considering that we would like the top corner of the triangle to be consistent with the boundary conditions on the triangle sides, we impose that \(\phi = 0\) on \(\xi = -2r_{\text {inc}}\).

Thus, we require \(f(r_{\text {inc}})=f(-2r_{\text {inc}})=0\). Let’s consider a shift in \(f(\xi )\),

for some constant \(\gamma \). Taking \(\gamma =-2r_{\text {inc}}\) we see that

To solve the original problem, we will consider separately the even and odd functions of \(\eta \), denoted \(\phi _e\) and \(\phi _o\) respectively,

noting that if both \(\phi _e\) and \(\phi _o\) satisfy (60) then their sum will automatically satisfy (60) also. Now we must satisfy the boundary conditions at \(v=r_{\text {inc}}\) and \(w=r_{\text {inc}}\), which are equivalent to \(\eta = u + 2r_{\text {inc}}\) and \(\eta = -u-2r_{\text {inc}}\). By symmetry, if \(\phi = 0\) is satisfied at one of these two boundaries, then it is satisfied at the other also.

Considering \(\phi _e\), we need to satisfy \(\phi _e = 0\) at \(\eta = u+2r_{\text {inc}}\). Recall that \(\xi = u\),

Now (70) cannot be zero for all u. But we know that \(\phi _e\) is a solution for all non-zero integers. This then motivates consideration of additive solutions at \(\eta = u+2r_{\text {inc}}\) of the form

Trigonometric identities can be used to write (71) as a sum of sines, which then indicates that for \(\phi _e=0\) to be satisfied we have \(\phi _e=0\), so the two mode solution is also inadequate. We consider adding more integers,

Writing (72) as a sum of sines, it can then be seen that \(\phi _e=0\) if

where it should be noted that these choices are not unique. We notice that adding the above expressions

which echoes the linear dependence \(u+v+w=0\). Adding (73a) and (73c), substituting *m* based on (74) we see

Then, due to the degeneracy in (74), we recall the condition (66c), which simplifies as

Combining (75) and (76) we can solve for \(\beta _n\), and then we can use (73) to determine \(\beta _l\) and \(\beta _m\),

with corresponding eigenvalue,

The odd solution \(\phi _o\) can be determined in a similar manner, where, in fact, due to the choice of conditions in (73), we find that the odd solution is of the same form. Thus the solution to (65) subject to the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions is given by

More detail can be found in McCartin [65].

## Rights and permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Keane, L.M., Hall, C.L. & Moyles, I.R. An improved approximation for hydraulic conductivity for pipes of triangular cross-section by asymptotic means.
*J Eng Math* **126, **12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10665-020-10079-y

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

### Keywords

- Asymptotic analysis
- Hydraulic conductivity
- Poiseuille flow
- Porous media flow
- Triangular flow