Advertisement

Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 92, Issue 1, pp 185–202 | Cite as

Approximation of limit cycles in two-dimensional nonlinear systems near a Hopf bifurcation by canonical transformations

  • Jianhe Shen
  • Huaxiong Chen
  • Zheyan Zhou
  • Shuhui Chen
Article

Abstract

A perturbation procedure is proposed that can determine the limit cycles and their associated frequencies in general two-dimensional nonlinear systems. There are three key points in the procedure – the derivation of the canonical system, a well-chosen parameter transformation, and suitable solution expansions. We show the efficiency of the perturbation method applied to a classical Rosenzweig–MacArthur predator–prey model. The explicit and analytical approximations to the limit cycles and their associated frequencies are derived. The good agreement between the analytical approximations and the numerically generated results shows the high accuracy and efficiency of the presented method, especially when the bifurcation parameter is moderately near the critical value.

Keywords

Limit cycle Perturbation procedure Two-dimensional system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (10972240, 11201072, and 11102041) and the Nonlinear Analysis Innovation Team (IRTL1206) funded by Fujian Normal University is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to thank the referees for their proposed improvements.

References

  1. 1.
    Nayfeh AH (1973) Perturbation methods. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nayfeh AH (1981) Introduction to perturbation methods. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kevorkian J, Cole JD (1981) Perturbation methods in applied mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verhulst F (2005) Methods and applications of singular perturbations: boundary layers and multiple timescales dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mudavanhu B, O’Malley RE Jr (2005) Working with multiscale asymptotics, solving weakly nonlinear oscillator equations on long-time intervals. J Eng Math 53:301–336CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viswanath D (2001) The Lindstedt–Poincaré technique as an algorithm for computing periodic orbits. SIAM Rev 43:478–495CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Junca S, Rousseletthe B (2011) The method of strained coordinates for vibrations with weak unilateral springs. IMA J Appl Math 76:251–276CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung YK, Chen SH, Lau SL (1991) A modified Lindstedt–Poincaré method for certain strongly nonlinear oscillators. Int J Nonlinear Mech 26:367–378CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lau SL, Cheung YK, Chen SH (1989) An alternative perturbation procedure of multiple scales for nonlinear dynamics systems. ASME J Appl Mech 56:667–675CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen SH, Cheung YK (1997) An elliptic Lindstedt–Poincaré method for certain strongly nonlinear oscillators. Nonlinear Dyn 12:199–213CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen YY, Chen SH, Sze KY (2009) A hyperbolic Lindstedt–Poincaré method for homoclinic motion of a kind of strongly nonlinear autonomous oscillators. Acta Mech Sinica 25:721–729CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu Z (1992) Nonlinear time transformation method for certain strongly nonlinear oscillation systems. Acta Mech Sinica 8:279–288CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amore P, Aranda A (2005) Improved Lindstedt–Poincare method for the solution of nonlinear problems. J Sound Vib 283:1115–1136CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    He JH (2002) Modified Lindstedt–Poincare method for some strongly nonlinear oscillations Part I: expansion of a constant. Int J Nonlinear Mech 37:309–314CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    He JH (2002) Modified Lindstedt–Poincare method for some strongly nonlinear oscillations Part II: a new transformation. Int J Nonlinear Mech 37:315–320CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He JH (2001) Modified Lindstedt-Poincare Methods for some strongly nonlinear oscillations Part III: double series expansion. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 3:317–320Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu P (1998) Computation of normal forms via a perturbation technique. J Sound Vib 211:19–38CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen SH, Shen JH, Sze KY (2009) A new perturbation procedure for limit cycle analysis in three-dimensional nonlinear autonomous dynamical systems. Nonlinear Dyn 56:255–268CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    May RM (1972) Limit cycles in predator–prey communities. Science 177:900–902CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murray JD (1978) Biological and chemical oscillatory phenomena and their mathematical models. Bull Inst Math Appl 14:162–169MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wrzosek DM (1990) Limit cycles in predator–prey models. Math Biosci 98:1–12CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuznetsov AY (1995) Elements of applied bifurcation theory. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Belhaq M, Houssni M, Freire E, Rodriguez-Luis AJ (2000) Analytical prediction of the two first period-doublings in a three-dimensional system. Int J Bifur Chaos 10(6):1497–1508Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grasman J (2011) Relaxation oscillations, in mathematics of complexity and dynamical systems. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianhe Shen
    • 1
  • Huaxiong Chen
    • 1
  • Zheyan Zhou
    • 1
  • Shuhui Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mathematics and Computer ScienceFujian Normal UniversityFuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Applied Mechanics and EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations