Journal of Engineering Mathematics

, Volume 67, Issue 1–2, pp 137–152 | Cite as

The flip-through of a plane inviscid jet with a free surface



The growth of a two-dimensional liquid jet is modelled, in which an inviscid incompressible fluid is in irrotational flow. On the moving free surface, the pressure is constant. The flow is symmetric with respect to the y-axis. The free-surface fluid particle that lies on the y-axis is Q and it has position y = Y(t). A velocity potential is presented that describes the local features of the flow near the centreline, and which contains essentially two unknowns: the velocity V(t) = d Y/d t of Q, and a length L(t). Near Q the free surface is a time-dependent parabola, whose curvature is directly proportional to a third unknown, F(t). The kinematic and dynamic free-surface boundary conditions constrain V, L and F to satisfy three ordinary differential equations. The solutions are a one-parameter family that separate into five types. For one type the free-surface curvature changes sign during the motion, so that the free surface changes from concave to convex—it executes flip-through. Soon after flip-through, there is a local maximum in the pressure, with respect to time and space. A short time later there is a maximum in the acceleration of Q. As t tends to infinity, V tends to a constant, V . An estimate is made of the time scale for flip-through, based on pressure changes, and it is found to decrease as V increases. When V is chosen very large, the values of the large maxima in pressure and acceleration become sensitive to small changes in the initial conditions. The results focus on the highly transient pressure field. The findings may help to describe the flip-through of a steep fronted water wave meeting a plane impermeable wall.


Flip-through Hydrodynamic impact Impact pressures Inviscid jet 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cooker MJ, Peregrine DH (1993) Impact pressures due to near breaking waves. In: Banner ML, Grimshaw RHJ (eds) IUTAM Symp. Breaking Waves. Springer, pp 291–297Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tuck EO (2000) Numerical solution for unsteady two-dimensional free surface flows. In: Miloh T, Zilman G (eds) 15th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies. Caesarea, Israel, pp 174–177Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Longuet-Higgins MS (2001) Vertical jets from standing waves: the bazooka effect. Proc R Soc Lond A457: 495–510MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Longuet-Higgins MS, Dommermuth DG (2001) Vertical jets from standing waves. II. Proc R Soc Lond A457: 2137–2149ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaw LL, Muelder SA, Baum DW, Winer KA (1994) Hypervelocity explosive-driven metal jet in air. Phys Fluids 6(9): 510Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor GI (1943) A formulation of Mr. Tuck’s conception of Munroe jets. In: Batchelor GK (ed) The scientific papers of Sir Geoffrey Ingram Taylor, vol 3. 358–362Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birkhoff G, MacDougall DP, Pugh EM, Taylor GI (1948) Explosives with lined cavities. J Appl Phys 19: 563–582CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Birkhoff G, Zarantonello EH (1957) Jets wakes and cavities. Academic, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurevich MI (1965) Theory of jets in ideal fluids. Academic, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooker MJ (2002) Unsteady pressure fields which precede the launch of free surface liquid jets. Proc R Soc Lond A458: 473–488MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duchemin L, Josserand C, Clavin P (2005) Asymptotic behavior of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Phys Rev Lett 94: 224–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duchemin L (2008) Self-focusing of thin liquid jets. Proc R Soc Lond A464: 197–206MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Howison SD, Ockendon JR, Wilson SH (1991) Incompressible water-entry at small dead-rise angles. J Fluid Mech 222: 215–230MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fraenkel LE, McLeod JB (1997) Some results for the entry of a blunt wedge into water. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A355: 523–535MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Semenov YA, Iafrati A (2006) On the nonlinear water entry problem of asymmetric wedges. J Fluid Mech 547: 231–256MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Korobkin AA (1995) Impact of two bodies one of which is covered by a thin layer of liquid. J Fluid Mech 300: 43–58MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Howison SD, Ockendon J, Oliver JM, Purvis R, Smith FT (2005) Droplet impact on a thin fluid layer. J Fluid Mech 542: 1–23CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borisova EP, Koriavov PP, Moiseev NN (1959) Plane and axially symmetric similarity problems of penetration and of stream impact. J Appl Math Mech 23: 490–507MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeff BW, Kleber B, Fineberg J, Lathrop DP (2000) Singularity dynamics in curvature collapse and jet eruption on a fluid surface. Nature 403: 401–404CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roisman IV, Tropea C (2002) Impact of a drop onto a wetted wall: description of crown formation and propagation. J Fluid Mech 472: 373–397MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Korobkin AA, Scolan Y-M (2006) Three-dimensional theory of water impact. Part 2. Linearized Wagner problem. J Fluid Mech 549: 373–434CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Longuet-Higgins MS, Oguz H (1995) Critical microjets in collapsing cavities. J Fluid Mech 290: 183–201MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Korobkin AA, Yilmaz O (2009) The initial stage of dam-break flow. J Eng Math 63: 293–308MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    King AC, Needham DJ (1994) The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction. I. A uniformly accelerating plate. J Fluid Mech 268: 89–101MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shu J-J (2004) Impact of an oblique breaking wave on a wall. Phys Fluids 16(3): 1–42CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Needham DJ, Chamberlain PG, Billingham J (2008) The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction. Part 3. An inclined accelerating plate. Q J Mech Appl Math 61: 581–614MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bagnold RA (1939) Interim report on wave pressure research. Proc Inst Civ Eng 12: 201–226Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bullock GN, Obhrai C, Peregrine DH, Bredmose H (2007) Violent breaking wave impacts. Part 1: results from large-scale regular wave tests on vertical and sloping walls. Coast Eng 54: 602–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MathematicsUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations