Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An exploratory study of api changes and usages based on apache and eclipse ecosystems

  • Published:
Empirical Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frameworks are widely used in modern software development to reduce development costs. They are accessed through their Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), which specify the contracts with client programs. When frameworks evolve, API backward-compatibility cannot always be guaranteed and client programs must upgrade to use the new releases. Because framework upgrades are not cost-free, observing API changes and usages together at fine-grained levels is necessary to help developers understand, assess, and forecast the cost of each framework upgrade. Whereas previous work studied API changes in frameworks and API usages in client programs separately, we analyse and classify API changes and usages together in 22 framework releases from the Apache and Eclipse ecosystems and their client programs. We find that (1) missing classes and methods happen more often in frameworks and affect client programs more often than the other API change types do, (2) missing interfaces occur rarely in frameworks but affect client programs often, (3) framework APIs are used on average in 35 % of client classes and interfaces, (4) most of such usages could be encapsulated locally and reduced in number, and (5) about 11 % of APIs usages could cause ripple effects in client programs when these APIs change. Based on these findings, we provide suggestions for developers and researchers to reduce the impact of API evolution through language mechanisms and design strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619117

  2. http://wiki.eclipse.org/Evolving_Java-based_APIs_2/

  3. http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/Java_API_Compliance_Checker

  4. http://tattletale.jboss.org/

  5. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.html

  6. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-13.html

  7. http://maven.apache.org/

  8. http://www.eclipse.org/aether/

  9. http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/Java_API_Compliance_Checker

  10. http://maven.apache.org/

  11. http://www.eclipse.org/aether/

  12. http://asm.ow2.org/

  13. http://lucene.apache.org/solr/

  14. http://lucene.apache.org/

  15. http://search.maven.org/

  16. http://marketplace.eclipse.org/

  17. http://www.ptidej.net/downloads/replications/emse2014b/

  18. http://sourceforge.net/

  19. http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/11/29/ms_quietly_dumps_windows_opengl/

  20. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/releases/org.apache.felix.framework-4.0.0/doc/changelog.txt

  21. http://www.docjar.com/docs/api/org/eclipse/swt/internal/win32/OS.html

  22. http://jdiff.org/

  23. http://sourceforge.net/

  24. http://mojo.codehaus.org/animal-sniffer/

  25. http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/index.html

  26. http://ispras.linuxbase.org/index.php/Java_API_Compliance_Checker

  27. http://jdiff.org/

  28. http://www.sab39.org/Software/Japitools/42/

  29. http://tattletale.jboss.org/

References

  • Ali N, Sharafi Z, Guéhéneuc Y-G, Antoniol G (2012) An empirical study on requirements traceability using eye-tracking. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, ser. ICSM 2012

  • Bavota G, Canfora G, Penta MD, Oliveto R, Panichella S (2013) The evolution of project inter-dependencies in a software ecosystem: the case of apache. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ser. ICSM ’13. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 280–289

  • Bloch J (2008) Effective Java (2nd Edition) (The Java Series), 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall PTR

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracha G, Cook W (1990) Mixin-based inheritance. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-oriented Programming and on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, ser. OOPSLA/ECOOP. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 1990, pp. 303–311. [Online]. Available. doi:10.1145/97945.97982

  • Businge J, Serebrenik A, van den Brand M (2013) Eclipse api usage: the good and the bad. Softw Qual J 1–35

  • Businge J, Serebrenik A, van den Brand M (2010) An empirical study of the evolution of eclipse third-party plug-ins. In: Proceedings of the Joint ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution (EVOL) and International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), ser. IWPSE-EVOL ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 63–72

  • Cossette BE, Walker RJ (2012) Seeking the ground truth: a retroactive study on the evolution and migration of software libraries. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ser. FSE ’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 55:1–55:11

  • Dagenais B, Robillard MP (2011) Recommending adaptive changes for framework evolution. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 20(4):19:1–19:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roover C, Lämmel R, Pek E (2013) Multi-dimensional exploration of api usage. In: ICPC, pp 152–161

  • Dig D, Comertoglu C, Marinov D, Johnson R (2006) Automated detection of refactorings in evolving components. In: ECOOP ’06: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg

  • Dietrich J, Jezek K, Brada P (2014) Broken promises: an empirical study into evolution problems in java programs caused by library upgrades. In: CSMR-WCRE, pp 64–73

  • Dig D, Johnson R (2006) How do apis evolve? A story of refactoring: Research articles. J Softw Maint Evol 18(2):83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dig D, Manzoor K, Johnson R, Nguyen TN (2007) Refactoring-aware configuration management for object-oriented programs. In: ICSE ’07: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 427–436

  • Espinha T, Zaidman A, Gross H-G (2014) Web api growing pains: stories from client developers and their code. In: CSMR-WCRE, pp 84–93

  • Fisher RA (1922) On the interpretation of χ 2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of p. J R Stat Soc 85(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fokaefs M, Tsantalis N, Stroulia E, Chatzigeorgiou A (2011) Jdeodorant: identification and application of extract class refactorings. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 21-28, 2011, pp 1037–1039

  • Fowler M, Beck K, Brant J, Opdyke W, Roberts D (1999) Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley

  • Gamma E, Helm R, Johnson RE, Vlissides J (1995) Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison-Wesley

  • Godfrey MW, Zou L (2005) Using origin analysis to detect merging and splitting of source code entities. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 31(2):166–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D, Mo L (2013) Content categorization of api discussions. In: ICSM, pp 60–69

  • Hou D, Yao X (2011) Exploring the intent behind api evolution: a case study. In: WCRE, pp 131–140

  • Kawrykow D, Robillard MP (2009) Improving api usage through automatic detection of redundant code. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ser. ASE ’09. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 111–122

  • Kim M, Cai D, Kim S (2011) An empirical investigation into the role of api-level refactorings during software evolution. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ser. ICSE ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 151–160

  • Kim M, Notkin D, Grossman D (2007) Automatic inference of structural changes for matching across program versions. In: ICSE ’07: Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering.Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 333–343

  • Kpodjedo S, Ricca F, Galinier P, Antoniol G, Guéhéneuc Y-G (2013) Madmatch: Many-to-many approximate diagram matching for design comparison. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39(8):1090–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämmel R, Pek E, Starek J (2011) Large-scale, ast-based api-usage analysis of open-source java projects. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ser. SAC ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 1317–1324

  • Linares-Vásquez M, Bavota G, Di Penta M, Oliveto R, Poshyvanyk D (2014) How do api changes trigger stack overflow discussions? A study on the android sdk. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on Program Comprehension, ser. ICPC 2014. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 83–94

  • Maalej W, Robillard MP (2013) Patterns of knowledge in api reference documentation. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 39(9):1264–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell T, Ray B, Kim M (2013) An empirical study of api stability and adoption in the android ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ser. ICSM ’13. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 70–79

  • Meng S, Wang X, Zhang L, Mei H (2012) A history-based matching approach to identification of framework evolution. In: Proceedings of 34th International Conference on Software Engineering, ser. ICSE 2012, pp 353–363

  • Mikhajlov L., Sekerinski E (1998) A study of the fragile base class problem. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON OBJECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING, ser. ECOOP’98. Springer, pp 355–382

  • Montandon JE, Borges H, Felix D, Valente MT (2013) Documenting apis with examples: Lessons learned with the apiminer platform. In: WCRE, IEEE, pp 401–408

  • Moritz E, Vásquez ML, Poshyvanyk D, Grechanik M, McMillan C, Gethers M (2013) Export: detecting and visualizing api usages in large source code repositories. In: ASE, pp 646–651

  • Nguyen HA, Nguyen TT, Wilson Jr.G., Nguyen AT, Kim M, Nguyen TN (2010) A graph-based approach to api usage adaptation. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications, ser. OOPSLA ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 302–321

  • Pearson K (1922) On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philosophical Magazine Series 5 50 (302):157–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Raemaekers S, van Deursen A, Visser J (2012) Measuring software library stability through historical version analysis. In: Proceedings of the, 2012, IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), ser. ICSM ’12. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 378–387

  • Raemaekers S, van Deursen A, Visser J (2014) Semantic versioning versus breaking changes: a study of the maven repository. In: 14th IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM 2014). Victoria (Canada), 28-29 Sept. 2014 IEEE Computer Society

  • Robbes R, Lungu M, Röthlisberger D (2012) How do developers react to api deprecation?: The case of a smalltalk ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ser. FSE ’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 56:1–56:11

  • Robillard MP, DeLine R (2011) A field study of api learning obstacles. Empir Softw Eng 16(6):703–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempero E, Anslow C, Dietrich J, Han T, Li J, Lumpe M, Melton H, Noble J (2010) Qualitas corpus: a curated collection of java code for empirical studies. In: 2010 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC2010), pp 336–345

  • Schärli N, Ducasse S, Nierstrasz O, Black A (2003) Traits: Composable units of behaviour. In: CardellLucai L (ed) Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-oriented Programming. [Online]. Available. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-45070-2_12. Springer, pp 248–274

  • Schäfer T, Jonas J, Mezini M (2008) Mining framework usage changes from instantiation code. In: ICSE ’08: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 471–480

  • Shah SMA, Dietrich J, McCartin C (2013) On the automation of dependency-breaking refactorings in java. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, ser. ICSM ’13. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 160–169

  • Sheskin DJ (2007) Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 4th edn. Chapman & All

  • Shi L, Zhong H, Xie T, Li M (2011) An empirical study on evolution of API documentation. In: Proceedings International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE 2011), pp 416–431

  • Thummalapenta S, Xie T (2008) Spotweb: Detecting framework hotspots and coldspots via mining open source code on the web. In: Proceedings of the 2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ser. ASE ’08. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp 327–336

  • Tonelli T, Czarnecki K, Lämmel R (2010) Swing to SWT and back: Patterns for API migration by wrapping. In: 26th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2010), September 12-18, 2010, Timisoara, Romania. IEEE Computer Society, pp 1–10

  • Wohlin C, Runeson P, Höst M (1999) Experimentation in software engineering: an introduction. Springer

  • Wu W, Adams B, Guéhéneuc Y-G, Antoniol G (2014) Acua: Api change and usage auditor. In: 4th IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), ser. SCAM’14

  • Wu W, Guéhéneuc Y-G, Antoniol G, Kim M (2010) Aura: a hybrid approach to identify framework evolution. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1, ser. ICSE ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 325–334

  • Wu W, Serveaux A, Guéhéneuc Y-G, Antoniol G (2014) The impact of imperfect change rules on framework api evolution identi cation:an empirical study, Empirical Software Engineering, vol. In Press

  • Xing Z, Stroulia E (2007) Differencing logical uml models. Autom Softw Eng 14(2):215–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing Z, Stroulia E (2007) API-evolution support with diff-CatchUp. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 33(12):818–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong H, Thummalapenta S, Xie T, Zhang L, Wang Q (2010) Mining api mapping for language migration. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1, ser. ICSE ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, pp 195–204

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel German for providing the Maven central repository snapshots. This work has been partly funded by FQRNT, NSERC, and the Canada Research Chair on Patterns in Mixed-language Systems. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments on previous versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DGIGL, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Quebec, Canada

    Wei Wu, Foutse Khomh, Bram Adams, Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc & Giuliano Antoniol

Authors
  1. Wei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Foutse Khomh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bram Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yann-Gaël Guéhéneuc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giuliano Antoniol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wu.

Additional information

Communicated by: Emerson Murphy-Hill

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, W., Khomh, F., Adams, B. et al. An exploratory study of api changes and usages based on apache and eclipse ecosystems. Empir Software Eng 21, 2366–2412 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9411-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9411-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation