Advertisement

Empirica

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 329–359 | Cite as

R&D and productivity: using UK firm-level data to inform policy

  • Mark Rogers
Original Paper

Abstract

The UK’s business R&D (BERD) to GDP ratio is low compared to other leading economies, and the ratio has declined over the 1990s. This paper uses data on 719 large UK firms to analyse the link between R&D and productivity during 1989–2000. The results indicate that UK returns to R&D are similar to returns in other leading economies and have been relatively stable over the 1990s. The analysis suggests that the low BERD to GDP ratio in the UK is unlikely to be due to direct financial or human capital constraints (as these imply finding relatively high rates of return).

Keywords

R&D Productivity 

JEL Classification

L10 O31 O34 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thank Bob Allen, Dirk Czarnitzki, Christine Greenhalgh, Marcel Fafchamps, Katrin Hussinger and others at an Oxford workshop (April 2005), the Global Conference on Business and Economics (Oxford, June 2005) and European Association of Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE) (Porto, September 2005), as well as an editor for helpful comments. Part of the database developed for analysis in this paper was developed at the Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre (OIPRC), St Peter’s College. The author is grateful to St Peter’s College for accommodation and administrative support for this research.

References

  1. Ackerberg D, Caves K (2004) Structural identification of production functions. mimeo, UCLA Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballot G, Fakhfakh F, Taymaz E (2002) Who benefits from training and R&D: the firm or the workers. ERC working paper in economics 02/01 www.erc.metu.edu.tr
  3. Baltagi B (1995) Econometric analysis of panel data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker B, Pain N (2003) What determines industrial R&D expenditure in the UK? NIESR discussion paper 211. http://www.niesr.ac.uk)
  5. Becker B, Hall S (2004) Testing the pooling assumption in an industry panel of R&D investment: what do we learn? NIESR working paper 241. http://www.niesr.ac.uk
  6. Bond S, Soderbom M (2005) Adjustment costs and the identification of Cobb-Douglas production functions. Economics department working paper, Oxford 2005-W04Google Scholar
  7. Bond S, Harhoff D, van Reenen J (2002) Corporate R&D and productivity in Germany and the UK. http://www.cepr.eu/meets/wkcn/1/1547/papers/Bond.pdf
  8. Bond S, Harhoff D, van Reenen J (2003) Investment, R&D and financial constraints in Britain and Germany. Institute for fiscal studies working paper W99/5Google Scholar
  9. Center for Business Research (2006) UK plc: just how innovative are we? www.cambridge-mit.org/downloads/
  10. Cervantes M (2003) Scientists and engineers: crisis, what crisis? OECD Observer 240/1 (December, web journal)Google Scholar
  11. Cohen W (1995) Empirical studies of innovative activity. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 182–264Google Scholar
  12. Driffield N (2001) The impact of domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. Manch Sch 69(1):103–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DTI (2003) Competing in the global economy: the innovation challenge. Department of trade and industry Dec 2003Google Scholar
  14. DTI (2005) R&D intensive businesses in the UK. DTI economics paper no. 11, Department of trade and industryGoogle Scholar
  15. Eurostat (2007) Science technology and innovation in Europe. The European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  16. Extel Financial (1996) Company analysis. On-line databaseGoogle Scholar
  17. Glen J, Lee K, Singh A (2001) Persistence of profitability and competition in emerging markets. Econ Lett 72:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goto A, Suzuki K (1989) R&D capital rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Stat 71(4):555–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greene W (1993) Econometric analysis. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhalgh C, Longland M (2002) Running to stand still?—intellectual property and value added in innovating firms. mimeo Oxford intellectual property research centre www.oiprc.ox.ac.uk/EJINDEX.html
  21. Greenhalgh C, Rogers M (2006) The value of innovation: the interaction of competition R&D and IP. Res Policy 35(4):562–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffith R (2000) How important is business R&D for economic growth and should the government subsidise it? IFS Briefing Note 12Google Scholar
  23. Griffith R, Harrison R (2003) Understanding the UK’s poor technological performance. IFS briefing note 37Google Scholar
  24. Griffith R, Harrison R, Haskel J, Sako M (2003) The UK productivity gap and the importance of services. AIM briefing note, December 2003Google Scholar
  25. Griffith R, Harrison R, van Reenen J (2004) How special is the special relationship? Using the impact of US R&D spillovers on UK firms as a test of technology sources. CEPR discussion paper 4698Google Scholar
  26. Griliches Z, Hausman J (1986) Errors in variables in panel data. J Econom 31:93–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1995) Production functions: the search for identification. NBER working paper 5067Google Scholar
  28. Hall B, Mairesse J (1995) Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. J Econom 65:263–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harhoff D (1998) R&D and productivity in German manufacturing firms. Econ Innov New Technol 6:22–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. HM Treasury (2003) Lambert review of business-university collaboration—final report. HMSOGoogle Scholar
  31. HM Treasury (2004) Spending review: science and innovation investment framework 2004–2014 http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_review
  32. Inland Revenue (2003) R&D tax credits: responses to ‘defining innovation’ and government proposals. HMSO Inland Revenue (UK)Google Scholar
  33. Johnston J, DiNardo J (1997) Econometric methods, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Klette T, Griliches Z (1996) The inconsistency of common scale estimators when output prices are unobserved and endogenous. J Appl Econom 11(4):343–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levinsohn J, Petrin A (2003) Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Rev Econ Stud 70:317–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Los B, Verspagen B (2000) R&D spillovers and productivity: evidence from U.S. manufacturing microdata. Empirical Economics 25(1):127–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mairesse J, Mohnen P (2003) Econometrie de l’innovation. In: Mustar P, Penan H (eds) Encyclopedie de l’innovation. Paris Economica (English reference to this at http://www.enteluigieinaudi.it/pdf/Seminari/Econometria/S_20040416.pdf), pp 431–452
  38. Marriott B (2006) Scientists engineers and technologists in Great Britain. Labour Market Trends, Office National Statistics April, pp 109–116Google Scholar
  39. Mueller D, Cubbin J (1990) The dynamics of company profits: an international comparison. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olley G, Pakes A (1996) The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica 64(6):1263–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD (2002) Tax incentives for research and development: trends and issues. Science, technology and innovation working paper, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. ONS (2001) Research and development in UK Businesses. Business Monitor MA14 2000. Issues by National Statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.uk
  43. Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change. Res Policy 13:343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Productivity Commission (2007) Public support for science and innovation. Productivity Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers M (2002) The influence of diversification and market structure on the R&D intensity of large Australian firms. Aust Econ Rev 35(2):155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rogers M (2006) Estimating the impact of R&D on productivity using the BERD-ARD data. Available at www.dti.gov.uk/economics/RandDProductivityBERD_Final.pdf
  47. Schankerman M (1981) The effects of double-counting and expensing on the measured returns to R&D. Rev Econ Stat 63(3):454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Symeonidis G (1996) Innovation firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes. OECD economics department working paper 161Google Scholar
  49. Tassey G (2007) Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit. J Technol Transfer 32:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomson PLC (2001) Company analysis. On-line data. Accessed in 2001Google Scholar
  51. Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K (2001) Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsai KH, Wang JC (2004) R&D productivity and the spillover effects of high-tech industry on the traditional manufacturing sector: the case of Taiwan. World Econ 27(10):1555–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tylecote A, Ramirez P (2006) Corporate governance and innovation: the UK compared with the US and ‘insider’ economies. Res Policy 35(1):160–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Reenen J (1997) Why has Britain had slower R&D growth? Res Policy 26(4–5):493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verspagen B (1995) R&D and productivity: a broad cross-section cross-country look. J Prod Anal 6:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wakelin K (2001) Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Res Policy 30:1079–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waring G (1996) Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns. Am Econ Rev 86(5):1253–1265Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harris Manchester CollegeOxfordUK
  2. 2.Aston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations