, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 35–47 | Cite as

Health information and cigarette consumption: supply and spatial considerations

  • Craig A. Gallet
Original Paper


Assessments of the impact of health information on smoking incidence have largely been based upon estimates of the national demand for cigarettes. Yet various arguments can be made for health information also affecting the supply of cigarettes. Moreover, the effect of policy may vary spatially. Indeed, by estimating the relationship between U.S. health information, demand, and supply, at the state-level, this is found to be the case in this paper. In particular, while state-level demand has decreased in the wake of health information, supply has also weakened via decreases in competition within the industry. This suggests a potential concern for policies that promote public health yet also raise the attention of antitrust officials.


Cigarettes Health information Demand and supply 

JEL Classification

L13 L66 I18 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams W, Brock J (1999) The tobacco wars. South-Western College Publishing, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnade C, Pick D, Gopinath M (1998) Testing oligopoly power in domestic and export markets. Appl Econ 30:753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagwell K, Staiger R (1997) Collusion over the business cycle. Rand J Econ 28:82–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1986) Estimating the dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation, and advertising reconsidered. Rev Econ Statist 68:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartelsman EJ, Becker RA, Gray WB (2000) NBER-CES manufacturing industry database. National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop JA, Yoo JH (1985) Health scare, excise taxes and advertising ban in the cigarette demand and supply. Southern Econ J 52:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresnahan T (1989) Empirical studies of industries with market power. In: Schmalensee R, Willig R (eds) Handbook of industrial organization. Elsevier Science Publishers, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaloupka FJ, Saffer H (1992) Clean indoor air laws and the demand for cigarettes. Contemp Policy Issues 10:72–83Google Scholar
  9. Council of Economic Advisors (1999) Economic Report of the President. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckard E (1991) Competition and the cigarette TV advertising ban. Econ Inq 29:119–133Google Scholar
  11. Farr SJ, Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (2001) The welfare effect of advertising restrictions in the U.S. cigarette industry. Rev Indust Organiz 18:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Federal Trade Commission (1998) Report to congress pursuant to the federal cigarette labeling and advertising act. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenn AJ, Antonovitz F, Schroeter JR (2001) Cigarettes and addiction: new evidence in support of the rational addiction model. Econ Lett 72:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallet CA (1997) Public policy and market power in the rayon industry. J Econ Bus 24:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallet CA (2003) Advertising and restrictions in the cigarette industry: evidence of state-by-state variation. Contemp Econ Policy 21:338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallet CA, List JA (2003) Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 12:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goel RK, Morey MJ (1995) The interdependence of cigarette and liquor demand. Southern Econ J 62:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haltiwanger J, Harrington J Jr (1991) The impact of cyclical demand movements on collusive behavior. Rand J Econ 22:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton JL (1972) The demand for cigarettes: advertising, the health scare, and the cigarette advertising ban. Rev Econ Statist 54:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ippolito RA, Murphy DR, Sant D (1979) Consumer responses to cigarette health information. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Kao K, Tremblay V (1988) Health scare, excise taxes, and advertising ban in the cigarette demand and supply: comment. Southern Econ J 54:770–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeler TE, Hu T, Barnett PG, Manning WG, Sung H (1996) Do cigarette producers price-discriminate by state? An empirical analysis of local cigarette pricing and taxation. J Health Econ 12:499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kennedy P (2003) A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Kluger R (1996) Ashes to Ashes: America’s Hundred-Year Cigarette War, the Public Health, and the Unabashed Triumph of Philip Morris. New York, Alfred A. KnopfGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewit EM, Coate D, Grossman M (1981) The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage Smoking. J Law Econ 24:545–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell M, Mulherin J (1988) Finessing the political system: the cigarette advertising ban. Southern Econ J 54:855–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porter RH (1986) The impact of government policy on the U.S. cigarette industry. In: Ippolito PM, Scheffman DT (eds) Empirical approaches to consumer protection economics. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Rotemberg J, Saloner G (1986) A supergame-theoretic model of price wars during booms. Am Econ Rev 76:390–407Google Scholar
  29. Rubinovitz RN (1993) Market power and price increases for basic cable service since deregulation. Rand J Econ 24:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmalensee R (1972) The economics of advertising. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider L, Klein B, Murphy K (1981) Government regulation of cigarette health information. J␣Law Econ 24:575–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simonich WL (1991) Government antismoking policies. Peter Lang Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Tobacco Institute (1998) The tax burden on tobacco. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Tremblay CH, Tremblay VJ (1995) The impact of cigarette advertising on consumer surplus, profit, and social welfare. Contemp Econ Policy 13:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warner K (1977) The effects of the anti-smoking campaign on cigarette consumption. Am J Public Health 67:645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yurekli AA, Zhang P (2000) The impact of clean indoor-air laws and cigarette smuggling on demand for cigarettes: an empirical model. Health Econ 9:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCalifornia State University at SacramentoSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations