Skip to main content
Log in

Accurate total solar irradiance estimates under irradiance measurements scarcity scenarios

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate estimates of total global solar irradiance reaching the Earth’s surface are relevant since routine measurements are not always available. This work aimed to determine which of the models used to estimate daily total global solar irradiance (TGSI) is the best model when irradiance measurements are scarce in a given site. A model based on an artificial neural network (ANN) and empirical models based on temperature and sunshine measurements were analyzed and evaluated in Córdoba, Argentina. The performance of the models was benchmarked using different statistical estimators such as the mean bias error (MBE), the mean absolute bias error (MABE), the correlation coefficient (r), the Nash-Sutcliffe equation (NSE), and the statistics t test (t value). The results showed that when enough measurements were available, both the ANN and the empirical models accurately predicted TGSI (with MBE and MABE ≤ |0.11| and ≤ |1.98| kWh m−2 day−1, respectively; NSE ≥ 0.83; r ≥ 0.95; and |t values| < t critical value). However, when few TGSI measurements were available (2, 3, 5, 7, or 10 days per month) only the ANN-based method was accurate (|t value| < t critical value), yielding precise results although only 2 measurements per month were available for 1 year. This model has an important advantage over the empirical models and is very relevant to Argentina due to the scarcity of TGSI measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akinoglu, B. G., & Ecevit, A. (1990). Construction of a quadratic model using modified Ångström coefficients to estimate global solar radiation. Solar Energy, 45, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. G. (1997). Self-calibrating method for estimating solar radiation from air temperature. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2, 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almorox, J., Benito, M., & Hontoria, C. (2005). Estimation of monthly Ångström-Prescott equation coefficients from measured daily data in Toledo, Spain. Renewable Energy, 30, 931–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almorox, J., Bocco, M., & Willington, E. (2013). Estimation of daily global solar radiation from measured temperatures at Cañada de Luque, Córdoba, Argentina. Renewable Energy, 60, 382–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampratwum, D. B., & Dorvlo, A. S. S. (1999). Estimation of solar radiation from the number of sunshine hours. Applied Energy, 63, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ångström, A. (1924). Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 50, 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos, V. Z., Papamichail, D. M., Aschonitis, V. G., & Antonopoulos, A. V. (2019). Solar radiation estimation methods using ANN and empirical models Author links open overlay panel. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 160, 160–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakirci, K. (2009a). Models of solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2580–2588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakirci, K. (2009b). Correlations for estimation of daily global solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine in Turkey. Energy, 34, 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, M. G., Vivian, D. N., Yee, S. H., & Santavy, D. L. (2009). Methods to estimate solar radiation dosimetry in coral reefs using remote sensed, modeled, and in situ data. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 151, 445–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basheer, I. A., & Hajmeer, M. (2000). Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43, 3–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Besharat, F., Dehghan, A. A., & Faghih, A. R. (2013). Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation: a review and case study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 798–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, K. L., & Campbell, G. S. (1984). On the relationship between incoming solar radiation and daily maximum and minimum temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 31, 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., Ersi, K., Yang, J., Lu, S., & Zhao, W. (2004). Validation of five global radiation models with measured daily data in China. Energy Conversion and Management, 45, 1759–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choubin, B., Zehtabian, G., Azareh, A., Rafiei-Sardooi, E., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., & Kişi, Ö. (2018). Precipitation forecasting using classification and regression trees (CART) model: a comparative study of different approaches. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(8), 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citakoglu, H. (2015). Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques via empirical equations for prediction of solar radiation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 118, 28–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Souza, J. L., Bastos Lyra, G., Dos Santos, C. M., Araujo Ferreira Junior, R., Tiba, C., Bastos Lyra, G., & Maringolo Lemes, M. A. (2016). Empirical models of daily and monthly global solar irradiation using sunshine duration for Alagoas State, Northeastern Brazil. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 14, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donatelli, M., & Campbell, G. S. (1998). A simple model to estimate global solar radiation. Proceedings of the fifth European society of agronomy congress, Nitra, Slovak Republic (pp. 133–134).

  • Duffie, J. A., & Beckman, W. A. (1991). Solar engineering of thermal processes. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elani, U. A. (2007). Distribution of ultraviolet solar radiation at Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 124, 235–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, M. T., & Menhaj, M. B. (1994). Training feed forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(6), 989–993.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1982). Estimating potential evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 108, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z., Wen, X., Liu, H., & Du, J. (2014). A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. Journal of Hydrology, 509, 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, A., Koury, R. N. N., Machado, L., & Pabon, J. J. G. (2018). Prediction of hourly solar radiation in Abu Musa Island using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Li, Y., Zhong, X., Zhao, C., Jensen, J. R., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Towards increasing availability of the Ångström-Prescott radiation parameters across China: spatial trend and modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 87, 975–989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, D. (1963). An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 11(2), 431–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Sáez, R., & Mora-López, L. (2014). Modelling the distribution of solar spectral irradiance using data mining techniques. Environmental Modelling & Software, 53, 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzathik, A. M., Ibrahim, M. Z., Samo, K. B., & Wan Nik, W. B. (2011). Estimation of global solar irradiation on horizontal and inclined surfaces based on the horizontal measurements. Energy, 36, 812–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newland, F. J. (1988). A study of solar radiation models for the coastal region of South China. Solar Energy, 31, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, J. A. (1940). Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 64, 114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quej, V. H., Almorox, J., Ibrakhimov, M., & Saito, L. (2016). Empirical models for estimating daily global solar radiation in Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quej, V. H., Almorox, J., Arnaldo, J. A., & Saito, L. (2017). ANFIS, SVM and ANN soft-computing techniques to estimate daily global solar radiation in a warm sub-humid environment. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar - Terrestrial Physics, 155, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafiei-Sardooi, E., Mohseni-Saravi, M., Barkhori, S., Azareh, A., Choubin, B., & Jafari-Shalamzar, M. (2018). Drought modeling: a comparative study between time series and neuro-fuzzy approaches. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(17), 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajedi-Hosseini, F., Malekian, A., Choubin, B., Rahmati, O., Cipullo, S., Coulon, F., & Pradhan, B. (2018). A novel machine learning-based approach for the risk assessment of nitrate groundwater contamination. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 954–962.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samani, Z. (2000). Estimating solar radiation and evapotranspiration using minimum climatological data. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 126, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, T. D. M. A. (1991). Estimation of global radiation for Sri Lanka. Solar Energy, 47, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharifi, S. S., Rezaverdinejad, V., & Nourani, V. (2016). Estimation of daily global solar radiation using wavelet regression, ANN, GEP and empirical models: a comparative study of selected temperature-based approaches. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar - Terrestrial Physics, 149, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonmete, M. H., Ertekin, C., Menges, H. O., Hacıseferoğullari, H., & Evrendilek, F. (2011). Assessing monthly average solar radiation models: a comparative case study in Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 175, 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urraca, R., Martinez-de-Pison, E., Sanz-Garcia, A., Antonanzas, J., & Antonanzas-Torres, F. (2017). Estimation methods for global solar radiation: case study evaluation of five different approaches in central Spain. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 1098–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyant, C., Notton, G., Kalogirou, S., Nivet, M.-L., Paoli, C., Motte, F., & Fouilloy, A. (2017). Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: a review. Renewable Energy, 105, 569–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, S., Gröbner, J., Zysset, C., Diener, L., Tzoumanikis, P., Kazantzidis, A., Vuilleumier, L., Stöckli, R., Nyeki, S., & Kämpfer, N. (2015). Cloud observations in Switzerland using hemispherical sky cameras. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 120, 695–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2012). Probability & statistics for engineers & scientists. Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wang, E., Yin, H., Feng, L., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Differences between observed and calculated solar radiations and their impact on simulated crop yields. Field Crops Research, 176, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widén, J., Carpman, N., Castellucci, V., Lingfors, D., Olauson, J., Remouit, F., Bergkvist, M., Grabbe, M., & Waters, R. (2015). Variability assessment and forecasting of renewables: a review for solar, wind, wave and tidal resources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 356–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorukoglu, M., & Celik, A. L. (2006). A critical review on the estimation of daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration. Energy Conversion and Management, 47, 2441–2450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica (FONCYT) for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Laura López.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Performance of models to estimate total global solar irradiance (TGSI) is assessed.

• Frequency of measurements needed to calibrate models is analyzed.

• A minimum number of TGSI measurements per month are enough for ANN training.

• When TGSI measurements are scarce, empirical methods (EM) are not accurate.

• An ANN model is an overriding option with respect to the analyzed EM if TGSI measurements are scarce.

Appendix

Appendix

The tables presented in this section show the weights found for the ANN model when 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days per month were used for the calibration/training processes (Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively).

Table 6 Weights of the ANN model when 2 days per month were used for the calibration/validation processes
Table 7 Weights of the ANN model when 3 days per month were used for the calibration/validation processes
Table 8 Weights of the ANN model when 5 days per month were used for the calibration/validation processes
Table 9 Weights of the ANN model when 7 days per month were used for the calibration/validation processes
Table 10 Weights of the ANN model when 10 days per month were used for the calibration/validation processes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López, M.L., Olcese, L.E., Palancar, G.G. et al. Accurate total solar irradiance estimates under irradiance measurements scarcity scenarios. Environ Monit Assess 191, 568 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7742-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7742-3

Keywords

Navigation