Assessment of compost quality and usage for agricultural use: a case study of Hebron, Palestine

  • Majed I. Al-Sari
  • Mohammed A. A. Sarhan
  • Issam A. Al-Khatib
Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Complying with the technical specifications of compost production is of high importance not only for environmental protection but also for increasing the productivity and promotion of compost use by farmers in agriculture. This study focuses on the compost quality of the Palestinian market and farmers’ attitudes toward agricultural use of compost. The quality is assessed through selection of 20 compost samples of different suppliers and producers and lab testing for quality parameters, while the farmers’ attitudes to compost use for agriculture are evaluated through survey questionnaire of 321 farmers in the Hebron area. The results showed that the compost in the Palestinian markets is of medium quality due to partial or non-compliance with the quality standards and guidelines. The Palestinian farmers showed a positive attitude since 91.2% of them have the desire to use compost in agriculture. The results also showed that knowledge of difference between compost and chemical fertilizers, perception of compost benefits, and previously experiencing problems in compost use are significant factors affecting the farmers’ attitude toward the use of compost as an organic fertilizer.

Keywords

Compost Organic fertilizer Attitude Compost quality Manure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by the Joint Service Council for Solid Waste Management for Hebron and Bethlehem Governorates (JSC-H& B) through PMSP program that is funded by the General Consulate of Italy.

References

  1. Achiba, W. B., Gabteni, N., Lakhdar, A., Laing, G. D., Verloo, M., Jedidi, N., & Gallali, T. (2009). Effects of 5-year application of municipal solid waste compost on the distribution and mobility of heavy metals in a Tunisian calcareous soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 130, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, H., Ali, N., Ahmad, A. R., Ibrahim, M., Ahmad, S., & Yaacob, S. (2012). Solid Waste management and the willingness to pay for improved services towards achieving sustainable living. Advances in Natural and Applied Science, 6(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Khateeb, A. J., Al-Sari, M. I., Al-Khatib, I. A., & Anayah, F. (2017). Factors affecting the sustainability of solid waste management system—the case of Palestine. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Khatib, I. A., Monou, M., Abu Zahra, A. F., Shaheen, H. Q., & Kassinos, D. (2010). Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries. A case study: Nablus district – Palestine. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1131–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al-Sari, M. I., Al-Khatib, I., Avraamides, M., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2011). A study on the attitudes and behavioural influence of construction waste management in occupied Palestinian territory. Waste Management and Research, 30(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrena, R., Font, X., Gabarrell, X., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Home composting versus industrial composting: influence of composting system on compost quality with focus on compost stability. Waste Management, 34, 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. (2006). A Logistic regression analysis of the contractor’s awareness regarding waste management. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(9), 1904–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. (2009). Attitudes and behavioural factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2005). Statistics review 14: Logistic regression. Critical Care, 9(1), 112–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colón, J., Martínez-Blanco, J., Gabarrell, X., Artola, A., Sánchez, A., Rieradevall, J., & Font, X. (2010). Environmental assessment of home composting. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Compost Management Program. (2005). A& L Canada laboratories. Compost analysis for available nutrients and soil suitability criteria and evaluation, report. Website: https://docgo.net/compost-management-compost-analysis-for-available-nutrients-and-soil-suitability-criteria-and-evaluation.
  12. Danso, G., Fialor, S. C., & Drechse, P. (2002). Farmers’ perception and willingness to pay for urban waste compost in Ghana. Waste Management and the Environment, ISBN 1–85312–907-0. Website: http://ir.knust.edu.gh/xmlui/handle/123456789/1938.
  13. Danso, G., Drechse, P., Fialor, S. C., & Giordano, M. (2006). Estimating the demand for municipal waste compost via farmers' willingness-to-pay in Ghana. Waste Management, 26(12), 1400–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Domingo, J. L., & Nadal, M. (2009). Domestic waste composting facilities: a review of human health risks. Environment International, 35, 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environmental Quality authority (EQA). (2007).Overview of solid waste management in the Gaza Strip.EQA library, Gaza City, The Gaza strip.Google Scholar
  16. HydroplanIngenieur-GesellschaftmbH, & AEEIC. (2013). Local market potential of organic compost fertilizers in Palestine “feasibility study”, project no. KFW-DEG/ E8122.Google Scholar
  17. IFC (International Finance Cooperation). (2012). Solid waste management in Hebron and Bethlehem governorates, assessment of current situation and analysis of new system. Report, Palestine.Google Scholar
  18. Ittiravivongs, A., (2012). Household waste recycling behavior in Thailand: The role of responsibility. International Conference on Future Environment and Energy IPCBEE, 28(2012).Google Scholar
  19. Jordanian Standard Institution (JSI). (2000). Technical regulation for organic fertilizers, Standard no 962/2000, Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  20. Mafarjeh, M. A. (2011). Feasibility of a windrow composting pilot for domestic organic waste recycling in Beit Liqia Village - Palestine. MSc. Thesis, Birzeit University, Palestine.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Agriculture (MoA). (2011). Reality and the use of compost in Palestine, general Administration of Soil and Irrigation, the Department of Soil, 2011 (internal report). Ramallah, Palestine.Google Scholar
  22. Mohee, R., Mauthoor, S., Bundhoo, Z. M. A., Somaroo, G., & Gunasee, S. (2015). Current status of solid waste management in small island developing states: a review. Waste Management, 43, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nassar, A. (2015). Potential of solid waste composting in the Gaza Strip-Palestine. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 4(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nassar, A., Tubail, K., & Afifi, S. (2009). Attitudes of farmers toward sludge use in the Gaza Strip. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 10(1), 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Strategy for Solid Waste Management in Palestinian Territory (2010–2014). (2010). Ramallah, Palestine.Google Scholar
  26. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). (2017). Main statistical indicators. Ramallah, Palestine.Google Scholar
  27. Palestinian Standards Institution (PSI). (2012). Standard specification for organic fertilizer (compost). PS/-2652, Ramallah, Palestine.Google Scholar
  28. Proietti, P., Calisti, R., Gigliotti, G., Nasini, L., & Marchini, A. (2016). Composting optimization: integrating cost analysis with the physical-chemical properties of materials to be composted. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1086–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qadomi, N. (2014). Good compost quality. Ramallah: Soil Department, Ministry of Agriculture (MoA).Google Scholar
  30. Sánchez-Monedero, M. A., Cegarra, J., García, D., & Roig, A. (2002). Chemical and structural evolution of humic acids during composting. Biodegradation, 13, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SIDA, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency. (2006). Urban solid waste management. Urban issue paper.Google Scholar
  32. Solutions for Development Consulting. (2009). Feasibility study for construction of compost factory. Palestine.Google Scholar
  33. Somda, J., Nianogo, A. J., Nassa, S., & Sanou, S. (2002). Soil fertility management and socio-economic factors in croplive stocks ystems in Burkina Faso: a case study of compostingtechnology. Ecological Economics, 43, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soobhany, N., Mohee, R., & Garg, V. K. (2015). Recovery of nutrient from municipal solid waste by composting and vermicomposting using earthworm Eudriluseugeniae. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(4, Part A), 2931–2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. The Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP). (2002). Comparison of compost standards within the EU, North America and Australasia. Main Report.Google Scholar
  36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1995). Decision maker’s guide to solid wastemanagement, volume II. Website: http://regulationbodyofknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EPA_Decision_Makers.pdf.
  37. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2015). Provision of services to prepare a Green House Gases (GHG) emission inventory and the mitigation chapters of Palestine’s Initial National Communication Report (INCR).Google Scholar
  38. United States Composting Council. (2001). Field guide to compost use. http://compostingcouncil.org/admin/wp-content/plugins/wppdfupload/pdf/1330/Field_Guide_to_Compost_Use.pdf.
  39. Vázquez, M. A., & Soto, M. (2017). The efficiency of home composting programmes and compost quality. Waste Management, 64, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, J., Karczewska, A., Drozd, J., Licznar, M., Licznar, S., Jamroz, E., & Kocowicz, A. (2007). Agricultural and ecological aspects of a sandy soil as affected by the application of municipal solid waste composts. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 39, 1294–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood End Research Laboratory. (2000). Compost quality standards & guidelines. Final Report.Google Scholar
  42. Woods End Research Laboratory. (2005). Interpretation of waste and compost tests. Journal of the Woods End Research Laboratory, 1(4), 1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Joint Services Council for Solid Waste Management for Hebron and Bethlehem Governorates (JSC-H& B)HebronPalestine
  2. 2.Faculty of Graduate StudiesBirzeit UniversityBirzeitPalestine
  3. 3.Institute of Environmental and Water StudiesBirzeit UniversityBirzeitPalestine

Personalised recommendations