Advertisement

Assessment of ozone toxicity among 14 Indian wheat cultivars under field conditions: growth and productivity

  • Aditya Abha Singh
  • Adeeb Fatima
  • Amit Kumar Mishra
  • Nivedita Chaudhary
  • Arideep Mukherjee
  • Madhoolika Agrawal
  • Shashi Bhushan Agrawal
Article

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone (O3) is a well-known threat to global agricultural production. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the second most important staple crop in India, although little is known about intra-specific variability of Indian wheat cultivars in terms of their sensitivity against O3. In this study, 14 wheat cultivars widely grown in India were exposed to 30 ppb elevated O3 above ambient level using open top chambers to evaluate their response against O3 stress. Different growth and physiological parameters, foliar injury and grain yield were evaluated to assess the sensitivity of cultivars and classified them on the basis of their cumulative stress response index (CSRI). Due to elevated O3, growth parameters, plant biomass, and photosynthetic rates were negatively affected, whereas variable reductions in yield were observed among the test cultivars. Based on CSRI values, HD 2987, DBW 50, DBW 77, and PBW 550 were classified as O3 sensitive; HD 2967, NIAW 34, HD 3059, PBW 502, HUW 213, and HUW 251 as intermediately sensitive, while HUW12, KUNDAN, HUW 55, and KHARCHIYA 65 were found to be O3-tolerant cultivars. Cultivars released after year 2000 were found to be more sensitive compared to earlier released cultivars. Path analysis approach showed that leaf area, plant biomass, stomatal conductance, net assimilation rate, and absolute growth rate were the most important variables influencing yield under O3 stress. Findings of the current study highlight the importance of assessing differential sensitivity and tolerance of wheat cultivars and response of different traits in developing resistance against elevated O3.

Keywords

Ozone Sensitivity Wheat Cumulative stress response index Growth parameters Yield 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Head of the Department of Botany and Department of Science and Technology (DST-FIST), Centre of Advanced Study (CAS), and Interdisciplinary School of Life Sciences (ISLS) for all the laboratory facilities. Science and Engineering Research Board (Department of Science and Technology), New Delhi, is greatly acknowledged for providing financial support to the work in form of major research project (SERB/PO/PS-62/2013). Authors are also grateful to an anonymous reviewer and editor for their valuable suggestions which helped in improving the quality of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10661_2018_6563_MOESM1_ESM.docx (414 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 414 kb)

References

  1. Andersen, C. P. (2003). Source–sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytologist, 157, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, C. P., Hogsett, W. E., Wessling, R., & Plocher, M. (1991). Ozone decreases spring root growth and root carbohydrate content in ponderosa pine the year following exposure. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21, 1288–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annual Report 2012–13 (2013). Directorate of wheat research, Karnal, India.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, M. R. (2005). Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell & Environment, 28, 949–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avnery, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Liu, J., & Horowitz, L. W. (2011). Global crop yield reductions due to surface ozone exposure: 2. Year 2030 potential crop production losses and economic damage under two scenarios of O3 pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 2297–2309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, J. D., Velissariou, D., Davison, A. W., & Holevas, C. D. (1990). Comparative ozone sensitivity of old and modern Greek cultivars of spring wheat. New Phytologist, 116, 707–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell, J.N.B., & Ashmore, M.R. (1986). Design and construction of open top chambers and methods of filteration (equipment and cost). In: Proceedings of II European open top chambers workshop. September 1906. Freiburg. CEC (pp 46–56). Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. Betzelberger, A. M., Gillespie, K. M., McGrath, J. M., Koester, R. P., Nelson, R. L., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2010). Effects of chronic elevated ozone concentration on antioxidant capacity, photosynthesis and seed yield of 10 soybean cultivars. Plant Cell & Environment, 33, 1569–1581.Google Scholar
  9. Biswas, D. K., & Jiang, G. M. (2011). Differential drought-induced modulation of ozone tolerance in winter wheat species. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 4153–4162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas, D. K., Xu, H., Li, Y. G., Sun, J. Z., Wang, X. Z., Han, X. G., & Jiang, G. M. (2008a). Genotypic differences in leaf biochemical, physiological and growth responses to ozone in 20 winter wheat cultivars released over the past 60 years. Global Change Biology, 14, 46–59.Google Scholar
  11. Biswas, D. K., Xu, H., Li, Y. G., Liu, M. Z., Chen, Y. H., Sun, J. Z., & Jiang, G. M. (2008b). Assessing the genetic relatedness of higher ozone sensitivity of modern wheat to its wild and cultivated progenitors/relatives. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59, 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brasseur, G. P., Hauglustaine, D. A., Walters, S., Rasch, P. J., Müller, J. F., Granier, C., & Tie, X. (1998). MOZART, a global chemical transport model for ozone and related chemical tracers: 1. Model description. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012, 103, 28265–28289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broberg, M. C., Feng, Z., Xin, Y., & Pleijel, H. (2015). Ozone effects on wheat grain quality—a summary. Environmental Pollution, 197, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaudhary, N., & Agrawal, S. B. (2013). Intraspecific responses of six Indian clover cultivars under ambient and elevated levels of ozone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 5318–5329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaudhary, N., & Agrawal, S. B. (2015). The role of elevated ozone on growth, yield and seed quality amongst six cultivars of mung bean. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 111, 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emberson, L. D., Buker, P., Ashmore, M. R., Mills, G., Jackson, L. S., Agrawal, M., Atikuzzaman, M. D., Cinderby, S., Engardt, M., Jamir, C., Kobayshi, K., Oanh, O. T. R., Quadir, Q. F., & Wahid, A. (2009). A comparison of north–America and Asian exposure–response data for ozone effects on crop yields. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 1945–1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng, Z., Kobayashi, K., & Ainsworth, E. A. (2008). Impact of elevated ozone concentration on growth, physiology and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a meta–analysis. Global Change Biology, 14, 2696–2708.Google Scholar
  18. Feng, Z., Pang, J., Kobayashi, K., Zhu, J., & Ort, D. R. (2011). Differential responses in two varieties of winter wheat to elevated ozone concentration under fully open-air field conditions. Global Change Biology, 17, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng, Z., Wang, L., Pleijel, H., Zhu, J., & Kobayashi, K. (2016). Differential effects of ozone on photosynthesis of winter wheat among cultivars depend on antioxidative enzymes rather than stomatal conductance. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flowers, M. D., Fiscus, E. L., Burkey, K. O., Booker, F. L., & Dubois, J. J. B. (2007). Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes differing in sensitivity to ozone. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 61, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuhrer, J. (2009). Ozone risk for crops and pastures in present and future climates. Naturwissenschaften, 96, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fuhrer, J., & Booker, F. (2003). Ecological issues related to ozone: agricultural issues. Environment International, 29, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gelang, J., Pleijel, H., Sild, E., Danielsson, H., Younis, S., & Selldén, G. (2000). Rate and duration of grain filling in relation to flag leaf senescence and grain yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) exposed to different concentrations of ozone. Physiologia Plantarum, 110, 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghude, S. D., Kulkarni, S. H., Kulkarni, P. S., Kanawade, V. P., Fadnavis, S., Pokhrel, S., Jena, C., Beig, G., & Bortoli, D. (2011). Anomalous low tropospheric column ozone over Eastern India during the severe drought event of monsoon 2002: a case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 18, 1442–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grantz, D. A., & Yang, S. (2000). Ozone impacts on allometry and root hydraulic conductance are not mediated by source limitation nor developmental age. Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 919–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guidi, L., Nali, C., Lorenzini, G., Filippi, F., & Soldatini, G. F. (2001). Effect of chronic ozone fumigation on the photosynthetic process of poplar clones showing different sensitivity. Environmental Pollution, 113, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2014) Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., ... & Vuuren, D. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  28. Koti, S., Reddy, K. R., Reddy, V. R., Kakani, V. G., & Zhao, D. (2005). Interactive effects of carbon dioxide, temperature, and ultraviolet–B radiation on soybean (Glycine max L.) flower and pollen morphology, pollen production, germination, and tube lengths. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lal, D. M., Ghude, S. D., Patil, S. D., Kulkarni, S. H., Jena, C., Tiwari, S., & Srivastava, M. K. (2012). Tropospheric ozone and aerosol long–term trends over the Indo–Gangetic Plain (IGP), India. Atmospheric Research, 116, 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauzerall, D. L., & Wang, X. (2001). Protecting agricultural crops from the effects of tropospheric ozone exposure: reconciling science and standard setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minchin, P. E. H., Thorpe, M. R., & Farrar, J. F. (1993). A simple mechanistic model of phloem transport which explains sink priority. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44, 947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mishra, A. K., Rai, R., & Agrawal, S. B. (2013). Differential response of dwarf and tall tropical wheat cultivars to elevated ozone with and without carbon dioxide enrichment: growth, yield and grain quality. Field Crops Research, 145, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morgan, P. B., Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2003). How does elevated ozone impact soybean? A meta-analysis of photosynthesis, growth and yield. Plant Cell and Environment, 26, 1317–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mulholland, B. J., Craigon, J., Black, C. R., Colls, J. J., Atherton, J., & Landon, G. (1997). Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on gas exchange and chlorophyll content in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Journal of Experimental Botany, 48, 1853–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ojha, N., Naja, M., Singh, K.P., Sarangi, T., Kumar, R., Lal, S., Lawrence, M.G., Butler, T.M., & Chandola, H.C. (2012). Variabilities in ozone at a semi-urban site in the Indo-Gangetic Plain region: Association with the meteorology and regional processes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D20).Google Scholar
  36. Pandey, A. K., Majumder, B., Keski–Saari, S., Kontunen–Soppela, S., Mishra, A., Sahu, N., Pandey, V., & Oksanen, E. (2015). Searching for common responsive parameters for ozone tolerance in 18 rice cultivars in India: results from ethylenediurea studies. Science of the Total Environment, 532, 230–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paoletti, E., De Marco, A., Beddows, D. C., Harrison, R. M., & Manning, W. J. (2014). Ozone levels in European and USA cities are increasing more than at rural sites, while peak values are decreasing. Environmental Pollution, 192, 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Picchi, V., Iriti, M., Quaroni, S., Saracchi, M., Viola, P., & Faoro, F. (2010). Climate variations and phenological stages modulate ozone damages in field-grown wheat. A three-year study with eight modern cultivars in Po Valley (Northern Italy). Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 135, 310–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pleijel, H., Berglen Eriksen, A., Danielsson, H., Bondesson, N., & Selldén, G. (2006). Differential ozone sensitivity in an old and a modern Swedish wheat cultivar grain yield and quality, leaf chlorophyll and stomatal conductance. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rai, R., Agrawal, M., & Agrawal, S. B. (2007). Assessment of yield losses in tropical wheat using open top chambers. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 9543–9554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rai, R., Agrawal, M., & Agrawal, S. B. (2010). Threat to food security under current levels of ground level ozone: a case study for Indian cultivars of rice. Atmospheric Environment, 44, 4272–4282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramanathan, V., & Ramana, M. V. (2005). Persistent, widespread, and strongly absorbing haze over the Himalayan foothills and the Indo–Gangetic Plains. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 162, 1609–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rao, M. V., Hale, B. A., & Ormrod, D. P. (1995). Amelioration of ozone–induced oxidative damage in wheat plants grown under high carbon dioxide (role of antioxidant enzymes). Plant Physiology, 109, 421–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saitanis, C. J., Bari, S. M., Burkey, K. O., Stamatelopoulos, D., & Agathokleous, E. (2014). Screening of Bangladeshi winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for sensitivity to ozone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 13560–13571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sarkar, A., & Agrawal, S. B. (2010). Elevated ozone and two modern wheat cultivars: an assessment of dose dependent sensitivity with respect to growth, reproductive and yield parameters. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 69, 328–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Singh, S., & Agrawal, S. B. (2009). Use of ethylenediurea (EDU) in assessing the impact of ozone on growth and productivity of five cultivars of Indian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 159, 125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh, R. P., Huerta-Espino, J., Sharma, R., Joshi, A. K., & Trethowan, R. (2007). High yielding spring bread wheat germplasm for global irrigated and rainfed production systems. Euphytica, 157, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh, A. A., Agrawal, S. B., Shahi, J. P., & Agrawal, M. (2014). Assessment of growth and yield losses in two Zea mays L. cultivars (quality protein maize and non quality protein maize) under projected levels of ozone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 2628–2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh, A. A., Singh, S., Agrawal, M., & Agrawal, S. B. (2015). Assessment of ethylene diurea–induced protection in plants against ozone phytotoxicity. DM Whitacre (Ed.) Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 233, 129–184.Google Scholar
  50. Tian, H., Ren, W., Tao, B., Sun, G., Chappelka, A., Wang, X., Pan, S., Yang, J., Liu, J., S Felzer, B., & M Melillo, J. (2016). Climate extremes and ozone pollution: a growing threat to China’s food security. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 2, e01203.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Dingenen, R., Dentener, F. J., Raes, F., Krol, M. C., Emberson, L., & Cofala, J. (2009). The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 604–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verstraeten, W. W., Neu, J. L., Williams, J. E., Bowman, K. W., Worden, J. R., & Boersma, K. F. (2015). Rapid increases in tropospheric ozone production and export from China. Nature Geoscience, 8, 690–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, X., Manning, W., Feng, Z., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Ground–level ozone in China: distribution and effects on crop yields. Environmental Pollution, 147, 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilkinson, S., Mills, G., Illidge, R., & Davies, W. J. (2012). How is ozone pollution reducing our food supply? Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aditya Abha Singh
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adeeb Fatima
    • 1
  • Amit Kumar Mishra
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nivedita Chaudhary
    • 1
    • 4
  • Arideep Mukherjee
    • 1
  • Madhoolika Agrawal
    • 1
  • Shashi Bhushan Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Air Pollution and Global Climate Change, Department of Botany, Institute of ScienceBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plant Molecular BiologyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Life SciencesBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael
  4. 4.Field Crops and Natural Resources, Institute of Plant SciencesAgricultural Research OrganizationM.P. NegevIsrael

Personalised recommendations