Determination of carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette refill solutions and aerosols through liquid-phase dinitrophenyl hydrazine derivatization
- 215 Downloads
In this study, we report a 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization HPLC/UV method to quantify carbonyl compounds (CCs) either in electronic cigarette (EC) refill solutions or in vaped aerosols. Vaped aerosol samples were entrained in a 1 L atm min−1 ambient lab air stream and pulled through an impinger containing a DNPH solution for derivatization. The mass change tracking (MCT) approach was used to check mass balance. Refill solution samples were diluted (2, 4, and 10 times) in a DNPH/acetonitrile solution for derivatization. EC vaping samples were collected for 5, 10, or 15 puffs (2-s puff duration) with a 10-s interpuff interval. The DNPH derivatization method was used successfully for the estimation of both EC liquid CCs concentrations and vaping emission factors. The results for formaldehyde (FA), acetaldehyde (AA), and butyraldehyde (BA) were determined as 10.4 ± 3.10 μg mL−1 (27.6 ± 7.43 ng puff−1), 1.9 ± 0.83 μg mL−1 (4.4 ± 1.98 ng puff−1), and 4.4 ± 2.82 μg mL−1 (12.0 ± 7.43 ng puff−1), respectively.
KeywordsElectronic cigarette Standard operating procedure Aerosol DNPH cartridge Formaldehyde
This research was supported by a grant (14182MFDS977) from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2017. This study was also supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea ((NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (No. 2016R1E1A1A01940995).
- Guthery, W. (2016). Emissions of toxic carbonyls in an electronic cigarette. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International Contributions to Tobacco Research, 27(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 3308:2012 (2012). Routine analytical cigarette-smoking machine—Definitions and standard conditions.Google Scholar
- Malhotra, J., Malvezzi, M., Negri, E., La Vecchia, C., Boffetta, P., (2016). Risk factors for lung cancer worldwide. European Respiratory Journal ERJ-00359.Google Scholar
- Pope, C. A., Burnett, R. T., Turner, M. C., Cohen, A., Krewski, D., Jerrett, M., Gapstur, S. M., & Thun, M. J. (2011). Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure-response relationships. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(11), 1616–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Protano, C., Di Milia, L., Orsi, G., & Vitali, M. (2015). Electronic cigarette: a threat or an opportunity for public health? State of the art and future perspectives. La Clinica Terapeutica, 166(1), 32–33.Google Scholar
- Uchiyama, S., Ohta, K., Inaba, Y., & Kunugita, N. (2013). Determination of carbonyl compounds generated from the e-cigarette using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Sciences, 29, 1219–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (2004). The health consequences of smoking: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta : USDHHS, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health romotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization (WHO) (2012). Standard operating procedure for intense smoking of cigarettes.Google Scholar