A comparative study of occurrence and fate of endocrine disruptors: diethyl phthalate and dibutyl phthalate in ASP- and SBR-based wastewater treatment plants
Phthalates are endocrine-disrupting chemicals which affect endocrine system by bio-accumulation in aquatic organisms and produce adverse health effects in aquatic organisms as well as human beings, when come in contact. Present study focuses on occurrence and removal of two phthalates: diethylphthalate (DEP) and dibutylphthalate (DBP) in two full-scale wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) i.e. sewage treatment plants (STPs) based on well-adopted technologies, activated sludge process (ASP) and sequencing batch reactor (SBR).Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis was performed for both wastewater and sludge sample for determination and identification of the concentration of these compounds in both STPs by monitoring the STPs for 9 months. It was observed that the concentration of DEP was less than DBP in the influent of ASP and SBR. Average concentrations of DEP and DBP in sludge sample of ASP were found to be 2.15 and 2.08 ng/g, whereas in SBR plant, these values were observed as 1.71 and 2.01 ng/g, respectively. Concerning the removal efficiency of DEP, SBR and ASP plants were found effective with removal efficiency of 91.51 and 91.03 %, respectively. However, in the case of DBP, SBR showed lower removal efficiency (85.42 %) as compared to ASP (92.67 %). Comparative study of both plants proposed that in ASP plant, DBP reduction was higher than the SBR. Fourier transformation infrared (FTIR) analysis also confirmed the same result of sludge analysis for both STPs. Sludge disposal studied with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) techniques confirmed that sludge of both STPs have high calorific value and can be used as fuel to make fuel-briquettes and bottom ash to make firebricks.
KeywordsActivated sludge process Endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) Dibutylphthalate Diethylphthalate GC–MS analysis Sequencing batch reactor TGA analysis
Authors are thankful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, for providing financial help for carrying out this work.
- Adibi, J. J., Whyatt, R. M., Williams, P. L., Calafat, A. M., Camann, D., Herrick, R., Nelson, H., Bhat, H. K., Perera, F. P., Silva, M. J., & Hauser, R. (2008). Characterization of Phthalate Exposure among Pregnant Women Assessed by Repeat Air and Urine Samples. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(4), 467–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- APHA. (2005), Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (21stedn.).Washington, DC: APHA, AWWA and WEF.Google Scholar
- Boonyaroj, V., Chiemchaisri, C., Chiemchaisri, W., Theepharaksapan, S., & Yamamoto, K. (2012). Toxic organic micro-pollutants removal mechanisms in long-term operated membrane bioreactor treating municipal solid waste leachate. Bioresource Technology, 113, 174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cai, Q. Y., Mo, C. H., Wu, Q. T., & Zeng, Q. Y. (2008). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalic acid esters in the soil–radish (Raphanussativus) system with sewage sludge and compost application. Bioresource Technology, 99(6), 1830–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clara, M., Windhofer, G., Hartl, W., Braun, K., Simon, M., Gans, O., Scheffknecht, C., & Chovanec, A. (2010). Occurrence of phthalates in surface runoff, untreated and treated wastewater and fate during wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 78(9), 1078–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- EPA Appendix A to part 136. (2002). Method for organic chemical analysis of municipal and industrial wastewater. Method 606— Phthalate ester.Google Scholar
- Gao, D., Li, Z., Wen, Z., Ren, N. (2014). Occurrence and fate of phthalate esters in full-scale domestic wastewater treatment plants and their impact on receiving waters along the Songhua River in China. Chemosphere, 95, 24–32.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.009.Google Scholar
- Kolarik, B., Bornehag, C. G., Naydenov, K., Sundell, J., Stavova, P., & Nielsen, O. F. (2008). The concentrations of phthalates in settled dust in Bulgarian homes in relation to building characteristic and cleaning habits in the family. Atmospheric Environment, 42(37), 8553–8559. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Y., Tang, F., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., Zeng, X., Luo, Q., & Wang, L. (2009). Biodegradation of dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate and di-n-butyl phthalate by Rhodococcussp. L4 isolated from activated sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 168(2-3), 938–943. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Medellin-Castillo, N.A. Ocampo-Perez, R., Leyva-Ramos, R., Sanchez-Polo M., Rivera-Utrilla, J., & Mendez-Diaz, J. D. (2013). Removal of diethyl phthalate from water solution by adsorption, photo-oxidation, ozonation and advanced oxidation process (UV/H2O2, O3/H2O2 and O3/activated carbon). Science of the Total Environment, 442, 26–35.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.062.
- Mondal, B., Srivastava, V. C., & Mall, I. D. (2012). Electrochemical treatment of dye-bath effluent by stainless steel electrodes: multiple response optimization and residue analysis. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 47(13), 2040–2051. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2012.695675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ozer, E.T., Osman, B., Kara, A., Bes, N., Irli, S., Gucer, E., & Sözeri, H. (2012). Removal of diethyl phthalate from aqueous phase using magnetic poly (EGDMA–VP) beads. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 229– 230, 20– 28. doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.037.
- Parida, S., Panda, M., Parija, A., & Das, S. C. (2014). Thermal studies of different agrowaste reinforced novolac composites prepared under isothermal conditions. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 5, 1580.Google Scholar
- Rudel, R. A., Dodson, R. E., Morello-Frosch, L. J. P. R., Zuniga, D. E. C. M. M., Yau, A. Y., Just, A. C., & Brody, J. G. (2010). Semivolatile endocrine-disrupting compounds in paired indoor and outdoor air in two Northern California Communities. Environmental Science Technology, 44(17), 6583–6590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silva, J. D. O., Filho, G. R., Ribeiro, S. D., Vieira, J. G., & Cerqueira, D. A. (2012). Thermal analysis and FTIR studies of sewage sludge produced in treatment plants. The case of sludge in the city of Uberlândia-MG, Brazil. ThermochimicaActa, 528, 72–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2011.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh, S., Srivastava, V. C., & Mall, I. D. (2013). Mechanistic study of electrochemical treatment of basicgreen 4 dye with aluminum electrodes through zetapotential, TOC, COD and color measurements, andcharacterization of residues. RSC Advanced, 3(37), 16426–16439. doi: 10.1039/c3ra41605d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tingting, M. A., Teng, Y., Christie, P., Luo, Y., Chen, Y., Ye, M., & Huang, Y. (2013). A new procedure combining GC-MS with accelerated solvent extraction for the analysis of phthalic acid esters in contaminated soils. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(1), 31–42. doi: 10.1007/s11783-012-0463-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhou, H., Huang, X., Wang, X., Zhi, X., Yang, C., Wen, X., Wang, Q., Tsuno, H., & Tanaka, H. (2010). Behaviour of selected endocrine-disrupting chemicals in three sewage treatment plants of Beijing, China. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 161(1-4), 107–121. doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0731-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar