Daily weather generator with drought properties by copulas and standardized precipitation indices



The weather generator is an essential process in water resource assessment. Most weather generators focus on extreme rainfall events and rainfall amounts in a relatively short time scale. However, drought events often last more than several months, which conventional weather generators hardly generate. Conventional weather generators assume that monthly rainfalls are independent, skewing drought event generation. The purpose of this study is to construct a weather generator with improved drought property generation, combining with monthly rainfall data from conventional weather generators and characteristics of standardized precipitation indices. The proposed weather generators employs four drought parameters, namely starting month, duration, average, and minimum standardized precipitation indices, generated using a copula method. Analytical results show that the four parameters generated by the copula method are consistent with historical records. The proposed weather generator overcomes the limitation of conventional weather generators and can generate both rainfall and drought properties. The results also indicate that the assumption of monthly independence in drought generation can cause underestimated occurrence and duration of drought events. The proposed generator is also demonstrated for climate change assessment. The analytical results show that the uncertainties from the selection of weather generators are even higher than those from the selections of global circulation models while applying to water shortage assessment. We therefore suggest that weather generators should consider drought characteristics which can be measured using the standardized precipitation index to reduce the uncertainty.


Climate change SPI Downscaling Drought characteristics Water shortage 



The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of Taiwan R.O.C. for financially supporting this research under contract no. NSC 99-2221-E-240-001. Thanks are given for the data supported from Taiwan Climate Change Projection and Information Platform.


  1. Bouyé, E., Durrleman, V., Nikeghbali, A., Riboulet, G., & Roncalli, T. (2000). Copulas for finance-a reading guide and some applications. Available at SSRN 1032533.Google Scholar
  2. Bussay, A. M., Szinell, C., Hayes, M., & Svoboda, M. (1998). Monitoring drought in Hungary using the standardized precipitation index. Annales Geophysicae, Supplement 11 to Vol 16, the Abstract Book of 23rd EGS General Assembly, C450. April 1998, Nice; France. Google Scholar
  3. Chen, C. T., Chu, J. T., Hsu, H. H., Suu, C. H., Chou, C., & Weng, S. P. (2014). Projection of climate change over Taiwan using statistical downscaling scheme. Atmospheric Sciences, 42(3), 207–251 (Abstract in English).Google Scholar
  4. Cowpertwait, P. S. P. (1991). Further developments of the Neyman-Scott clustered point process for modelling rainfall. Water Resources Research, 27, 1431–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fatichi, S., Ivanov, V. Y., & Caporali, E. (2011). Simulation of future climate scenarios with a weather generator. Advances in Water Resources, 34(4), 448–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glenis, V., Pinamonti, V., Hall, J., & Kilsby, C. (2015). A transient stochastic weather generator incorporating climate model uncertainty. Advances in Water Resources, 85, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gregory, J. M., Wigley, T. M. L., & Jones, P. D. (1992). Determining and interpreting the order of a two-state Markov chain: application to models of daily precipitation. Water Resources Research, 28, 1443–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory, J. M., Wigley, T. M. L., & Jones, P. D. (1993). Application of Markov models to area-average daily precipitation series and interannual variability in seasonal totals. Climate Dynamics, 8, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guttman, N. B. (1998). Comparing the palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hay, L. E., Wilby, R. L., & Leavesley, G. H. (2000). A comparison of delta change and downscaled GCM scenarios for three mounfainous basins in THE UNITED STATES1. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(2), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hollinger, S. E., Isard, S. A., Welford, M. R. (1993). A new soil moisture drought index for predicting crop yields. In Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology (pp. 187–190). Anaheim, CA: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  12. Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) (1975). Hydrologic engineering methods for water resources development, Vol. 8, reservoir yield. US Army Corps of Engineers: Davis, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Kilsby, C. G., Jones, P. D., Burton, A., Ford, A. C., Fowler, H. J., & Harpham, C. (2007). A daily weather generator for use in climate change studies. Environmental Modelling & Software, 22(12), 1705–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, D. W., Byun, H. R., & Choi, K. S. (2009). Evaluation, modification, and application of the effective drought index to 200-year drought climatology of Seoul, Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 378, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu, J., Williams, J. R., Wang, X., & Yang, H. (2009). Using MODAWEC to generate daily weather data for the EPIC model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24(5), 655–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, January 17–22, 1993 (pp. 179–184). Boston, Massachusetts: American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
  17. Meyer, S. J., Hubbard, K. G., & Wilhite, D. A. (1993). The development of a crop specific drought index for corn. Part I: model development and validation. Agronomy Journal, 85, 388–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmer, W. C. (1965). Meteorological drought (Vol. 30). Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau.Google Scholar
  19. Richardson, J. S. (1981). The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Academic Press, 34, 167–339.Google Scholar
  20. Richardson, C. W., & Wright, D. A. (1984). WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables (p. 83). Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.Google Scholar
  21. Semenov, M. A. (2008). Simulation of extreme weather events by a stochastic weather generator. Climate Research, 35(3), 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Semenov, M. A., & Brooks, R. J. (1999). Spatial interpolation of the LARS-WG stochastic weather generator in Great Britain. Climate Research, 11(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Serinaldi, F., Bonaccorso, B., Cancelliere, A., & Grimaldi, S. (2009). Probabilistic characterization of drought properties through copulas. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 34(10), 596–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sklar, A. (1996). Random variables, distribution functions, and copulas: a personal look backward and forward. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 1–14.Google Scholar
  25. Szalai, S., & Szinell, C. S. (2000). Comparison of two drought indices for drought monitoring in Hungary—a case study. In Drought and drought mitigation in Europe (pp. 161–166). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, C. S. (1984). Homogeneity analysis of rainfall series: an application of the use of a realistic rainfall model. Journal of Climatology, 4(6), 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tung, C. P., & Haith, D. A. (1995). Global-warming effects on New York streamflows. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 121(2), 216–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilby, R. L., & Dawson, C. W. (2013). The statistical downscaling model: insights from one decade of application. International Journal of Climatology, 33(7), 1707–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams, J. R., & Singh, V. P. (1995). The EPIC model. Computer models of watershed hydrology, 909–1000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Earth ScienceChinese Culture UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of GeographyNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.National Science and Technology Center for Disaster ReductionTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations