Analysis of field-scale spatial correlations and variations of soil nutrients using geostatistics
Spatial correlations and soil nutrient variations are important for soil nutrient management. They help to reduce the negative impacts of agricultural nonpoint source pollution. Based on the sampled available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK), soil nutrient data from 2010, the spatial correlation, was analyzed, and the probabilities of the nutrient’s abundance or deficiency were discussed. This paper presents a statistical approach to spatial analysis, the spatial correlation analysis (SCA), which was originally developed for describing heterogeneity in the presence of correlated variation and based on ordinary kriging (OK) results. Indicator kriging (IK) was used to assess the susceptibility of excess of soil nutrients based on crop needs. The kriged results showed there was a distinct spatial variability in the concentration of all three soil nutrients. High concentrations of these three soil nutrients were found near Anzhou. As the distance from the center of town increased, the concentration of the soil nutrients gradually decreased. Spatially, the relationship between AN and AP was negative, and the relationship between AP and AK was not clear. The IK results showed that there were few areas with a risk of AN and AP overabundance. However, almost the entire study region was at risk of AK overabundance. Based on the soil nutrient distribution results, it is clear that the spatial variability of the soil nutrients differed throughout the study region. This spatial soil nutrient variability might be caused by different fertilizer types and different fertilizing practices.
KeywordsNonpoint source pollution Soil nutrient Geostatistics Spatial variability Spatial correlation coefficient
The research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Social Science Fund (14YJAZH048), CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2014223/KY), and the Water Specific Project of China (2008ZX07209-007).
- Chen, D., Dahlgren, R. A., Shen, Y., & Lu, J. (2012a). A Bayesian approach for calculating variable total maximum daily loads and uncertainty assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 430(14), 59–67.Google Scholar
- Dou, W., & Zhao, Z. (1998). Contamination of DDT and BHC in water, sediments, and fish (Carassius auratus) muscle from Baiyangdian Lake. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 18, 208–312.Google Scholar
- Environmental Protection Agency (2008). Nonpoint source pollution: the nation’s largest water quality problem [online]. Http: //www.epa.gov/owow/nps/facts/point1.htm.
- Goovaerts, P. (1997). Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation (p. 483). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, M. S., Park, G. A., Park, M. J., Park, J. Y., Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. J. (2010). Evaluation of non-point source pollution reduction by applying Best Management Practices using a SWAT model and QuickBird high resolution satellite imagery. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(6), 826–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, R. M., Yang, Z. F., Shen, Z. Y., Yu, S. L., Ding, X. W., Xing, W., & Liu, F. (2009). Estimating nonpoint source pollution in the upper Yangtze river using the export coefficient model, remote sensing, and geographical information system. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(9), 698–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, R. K. (2000). Chemical analysis methods of agricultural soil (Chinese) (pp. 45–78). Beijing: Press of China Agricultural technology.Google Scholar
- Matheron, G. (1965). Les variables regionalisees et leur estimation. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
- Reungsang, P., Kanwar, R., Jha, M., Ahmad, K., & Saleh, A. (2005). Calibration and validation of swat for the upper maquoketa river watershed. Center for Agricultural & Rural Development Publications.Google Scholar
- Ritter, W. F., & Shirmohammadi, A. (2001). Agricultural non-point source pollution. New York: Lewis publishers.Google Scholar
- Rufino, M. M., Maynou, F., Abelló, P., Sola, L. G. D., & Yule, A. B. (2005). The effect of methodological options on geostatistical modelling of animal distribution: a case study with Liocarcinus depurator (crustacea: brachyura) trawl survey data. Fisheries Research, 76(2), 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silva, J. A., & Uchida, R. S. (2000). Plant nutrient management in Hawaii’s soils, approaches for tropical and subtropical agriculture (pp. 87–89). University of Hawaii at Manoa: College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources.Google Scholar
- Tesfahunegn, G. B., Tamene, L., & Vlek, P. L. G. (2011). Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern ethiopia. Soil & Tillage Research, 117(6), 124–139.Google Scholar
- Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2001). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Ltd, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Yang, L. Z., & Sun, B. (2008). Nutrients recycling, balance and management of agricultural ecological system in China (Chinese) (pp. 28–60). Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
- Zhang, F. S. (2011). Fertilizing technology based on soil nutrient test (Chinese) (pp. 11–23). Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar