The occurrence and removal of selected fluoroquinolones in urban drinking water treatment plants
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are a widely prescribed group of antibiotics. They enter the aqueous environment, where they are frequently detected, and can lead to a threat to human health. Drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) play a key role in removing FQs from potable water. This study investigated the occurrence and removal of four selected FQs (norfloxacin (NOR), ciprofloxacin (CIP), enrofloxacin (ENR), and ofloxacin (OFL)) in three urban DWTPs in China. The treatment efficacy for each system was simultaneously evaluated. Two of the examined DWTPs used conventional treatment processes. The third used conventional processes followed by additional treatment processes (ozonation-biologically activated carbon (ozonation-BAC) and membrane technology). The average concentrations of the four FQs in the source water and the finished water ranged from 51 to 248 ng/L and from <5 to 46 ng/L, respectively. Based on residual concentrations, the conventional treatment system had a low removal of FQs. In contrast, the addition of advanced treatment processes such as the ozonation-BAC and membranes, substantially improved the removal of FQs. The finding of this study has important implications: even though coagulation-sedimentation and chlorination treatment processes can remove most target FQs, the typical practice of advanced treatment processes is necessary for the further removal.
KeywordsFluoroquinolones (FQs) Drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) Advanced treatment process Removal ratio Reduction in concentration
This work has been financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51108118), Heilongjiang Province Scholarship Foundation (LC2012C28), and the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2014ZX07405002).
- Dorival-Garcia, N., Zafra-Gomez, A., Cantarero, S., Navalon, A., & Vilchez, J. L. (2013). Simultaneous determination of 13 quinolone antibiotic derivatives in wastewater samples using solid-phase extraction and Ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Microchemical Journal, 106, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Focazio, M. J., Kolpin, D. W., Barnes, K. K., Furlong, E. T., Meyer, M. T., Zaugg, S. D., et al. (2008). A national reconnaissance for pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants in the United States - II) Untreated drinking water sources. Science of the Total Environment, 402(2-3), 201–216.Google Scholar
- Gracia-Lor, E., Sancho, J. V., & Hernandez, F. (2011). Multi-class determination of around 50 pharmaceuticals, including 26 antibiotics, in environmental and wastewater samples by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218(16), 2264–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gros, M., Rodriguez-Mozaz, S., & Barcelo, D. (2013). Rapid analysis of multiclass antibiotic residues and some of their metabolites in hospital, urban wastewater and river water by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1292, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Micallef, S. A., Goldstein, R. E. R., George, A., Kleinfelter, L., Boyer, M. S., McLaughlin, C. R., et al. (2012). Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of multiple salmonella serotypes recovered from water, sediment and soil on mid-Atlantic tomato farms. Environmental Research, 114, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Renew, J. E., & Huang, C. H. (2004). Simultaneous determination of fluoroquinolone, sulfonamide, and trimethoprim antibiotics in wastewater using tandem solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1042(1–2), 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ye, Z. Q., Weinberg, H. S., & Meyer, M. T. (2007). Trace analysis of trimethoprim and sulfonamide, macrolide, quinolone, and tetracycline antibiotics in chlorinated drinking water using liquid chromatography electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry, 79(3), 1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar