The statistical evaluation and comparison of ADMS-Urban model for the prediction of nitrogen dioxide with air quality monitoring network
- 361 Downloads
In many countries, road traffic is one of the main sources of air pollution associated with adverse effects on human health and environment. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is considered to be a measure of traffic-related air pollution, with concentrations tending to be higher near highways, along busy roads, and in the city centers, and the exceedances are mainly observed at measurement stations located close to traffic. In order to assess the air quality in the city and the air pollution impact on public health, air quality models are used. However, firstly, before the model can be used for these purposes, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the dispersion modelling as one of the most widely used method. The monitoring and dispersion modelling are two components of air quality monitoring system (AQMS), in which statistical comparison was made in this research. The evaluation of the Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS-Urban) was made by comparing monthly modelled NO2 concentrations with the data of continuous air quality monitoring stations in Kaunas city. The statistical measures of model performance were calculated for annual and monthly concentrations of NO2 for each monitoring station site. The spatial analysis was made using geographic information systems (GIS). The calculation of statistical parameters indicated a good ADMS-Urban model performance for the prediction of NO2. The results of this study showed that the agreement of modelled values and observations was better for traffic monitoring stations compared to the background and residential stations.
KeywordsAir pollution Nitrogen dioxide Monitoring Dispersion modelling Statistics
The authors acknowledge the use of air quality data from the Kaunas city Municipality and Environmental Protection Agency.
- Batterman, S. A., Zhang, K., & Kononowech, R. (2010). Prediction and analysis of near-road concentrations using a reduced-form emission/dispersion model. Environmental Health, 9(29), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Carslaw, D., ApSimon, H., Beevers, S., Brookes, D., Carruthers, D., Cooke, S., et al. (2013). Defra Phase 2 urban model evaluation. http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat20/1312021020_131031urbanPhase2.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2014.
- CERC. (2011). ADMS-Urban User Guide. Version 3.1. Cambridge, UK, 324. http://www.cerc.co.uk/environmental-software/assets/data/doc_userguides/CERC_ADMS-Urban3.1_User_Guide.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2014.
- Council Directive 2008/50/EC (2008). On ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. From the Official Journal of the European Union, 11.6.2008, En series, L152/1.Google Scholar
- Debry, E., Malherbe, L., Schillinger, C., Bessagnet, B., Rouil, L. (2009). Uncertainty characterization and quantification in air pollution models. Application to the ADMS-Urban model. Geophysical Research Abstracts. EGU General Assembly. Vienna April 19–24.Google Scholar
- DEFRA (2010). Evaluating the performance of air quality models. http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/assets/documents/reports/cat05/1006241607_100608_MIP_Final_Version.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2014.
- European Environment Agency. (2009). Ensuring quality of life in Europe’s cities and towns. Copenhagen: EEA. Report No5/2009.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency. (2011). The application of models under the European union’s air quality directive: a technical reference guide. EEA technical report No10/2011. Copenhagen. https://www.eionet.europa.eu/events/EIONET/Technical%20report_3. Accessed 10 Aug 2014.
- Heck, J. E., Wu, J., Lombardi, C., Qiu, J., Meyers, T. J., Wilhelm, M., et al. (2013). Childhood cancer and traffic-related air pollution exposure in pregnancy and early life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(11–12), 1385–1391.Google Scholar
- Lewné, M., Cyrys, J., Meliefste, K., Hoek, G., Brauer, M., Fischer, P., Gehring, U., Heinrich, J., Brunekreef, B., Bellander, T. (2004). Spatial variation in nitrogen dioxide in three European areas. Science of The Total Environment, 332(1-3), 217–230.Google Scholar
- Lioy, P. J., & Smith, K. R. (2013). A discussion of exposure science in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(4), 405–409.Google Scholar
- McHugh, C. A., Carruthers, D. J., & Edmunds, H. A. (1997). ADMS-urban: an air quality management system for traffic, domestic and industrial pollution. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 8, 666–674.Google Scholar
- Mohan, M., Bhati, S., Sreenivas, A., & Marrapu, P. (2011). Performance evaluation of AERMOD and ADMS-urban for total suspended particulate matter concentrations in megacity Delhi. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 11, 883–894.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, H.T., Kim, K.-H. (2006). Comparison of spatiotemporal distribution patterns of NO2 between four different types of air quality monitoring stations. Chemosphere, 65(2), 201–212.Google Scholar
- Pénard-Morand, C., Schillinger, C., Armengaud, A., Debotte, G., Chrétien, E., Pelllier, S., et al. (2006). Assessment of schoolchildren’s exposure to traffic-related air pollution in the French six cities study using a dispersion model. Atmospheric Environment, 40(13), 2274–2287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sayegh, A. S., Munir, S., & Habeebullah, T. M. (2014). Comparing the performance of statistical models for predicting PM10 concentrations. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14, 653–665.Google Scholar
- Van den Hooven, E. H., Pierik, F. H., Van Ratingen, S. W., Zandveld, P. Y. J., Meijer, E. W., Hofman, A., et al. (2012). Air pollution exposure estimation using dispersion modelling and continuous monitoring data in a prospective birth cohort study in the Netherlands. Environmental Health, 11(9), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Wiemann, S., Richtera, S., Karrascha, P., Braunera, J., Pechb, K., Bernarda, L. (2012). Classification-driven air pollution mapping as for environment and health analysis. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) conference. Leipzig, Germany. July 1–5.Google Scholar