Abstract
It is accepted that occupants who are more satisfied with their workplace’s building internal environment are more productive. The main objective of the study was to measure the occupants’ level of satisfaction and the perceived importance of the design or refurbishment on office conditions. The study also attempted to determine the factors affecting the occupants’ satisfaction with their building or office conditions. Post-occupancy evaluations were conducted using a structured questionnaire developed by the Built Environment Research Group at the University of Manchester, UK. Our questionnaires incorporate 22 factors relating to the internal environment and rate these in terms of “user satisfaction” and “degree of importance.” The questions were modified to reflect the specific setting of the study and take into consideration the local conditions and climate in Malaysia. The overall mean satisfaction of the occupants toward their office environment was 5.35. The results were measured by a single item of overall liking of office conditions in general. Occupants were more satisfied with their state of health in the workplace, but they were extremely dissatisfied with the distance away from a window. The factor analysis divided the variables into three groups, namely intrusion, air quality, and office appearance. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was then used to determine which factor had the most significant influence on occupants’ satisfaction: appearance. The findings from the study suggest that continuous improvement in aspects of the building’s appearance needs to be supported with effective and comprehensive maintenance to sustain the occupants’ satisfaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Sabha, A. N. (2004). A guide to thermal comfort environment. Rafidain Journal of Science, 16(1), 105–111. Physics, Special Issue.
ANSI/ASHRAE. (2010). Standard 55–2010: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.
Aries, M. B. C., Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 533–541.
Bass, B., Economou, V., Christina, K. K. L., Perks, T., Suzanne, A. S., & Yip, Q. (2003). The interaction between physical and social-psychological factors in indoor environmental health. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 85(2), 199–219.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
Bluyssen, P. M., & Cox, C. (2002). Indoor environment quality and upgrading of European office buildings. Energy and Buildings, 34(2), 155–162.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (p. 1989). New York: Wiley.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newsbury Park: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Clement-Croome, D. J., Awbi, H. B., Bako-Biro, Z., Kochhar, N., & Williams, M. (2008). Ventilation rates in schools. Building and Environment, 43, 362–367.
Di Giulio, M., Grande, R., di Campli, E., di Bartolomeo, S., & Cellini, L. (2010). Indoor air quality in university environments. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 170, 509–517.
Fanger, P. O. (1970). Thermal comfort. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.
Frontczak, M., Schiavon, S., Goins, J., Arens, E., Zhang, H., & Wargocki, P. (2012). Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air, 22(2), 119–131.
Groth, A. (2007). Climatic and non climatic aspect of indoor environment. Energy Efficiency Building Design Guidelines for Botswana, 6-9.
Havenith, G. (1999). Heat balance when wearing protective clothing. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 43(5), 289–296. doi:10.1016/S0003-4878(99)00051-4.
Huang, L., Zhu, Y., Qin, O., & Cao, B. (2012). A study on the defects of thermal, luminous and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices. Building and Environment, 49, 304–309.
Kamaruzzaman, S. N., & Sabrani, N. A. (2011). The effect of indoor air quality (IAQ) towards occupants’ psychological performance in office buildings. Journal of Design + Built, 4, 49–61.
Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Egbu, C. O., Emma, M. A. Z., Azlan, S. A., & Adi, I. C. (2011). The effect of indoor environmental quality on occupants perception of performance: A case study of refurbished historic buildings in Malaysia. Energy and Buildings, 43, 407–413.
Kim, J., de Dear, R., Candido, C., Zhang, H., & Arens, E. (2013). Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Building and Environment, 70, 245–256.
Kuo, N. W., Chiang, H. C., & Chiang, C. M. (2008). Development and application of an integrated indoor air quality audit to an international hotel building in Taiwan. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 147(1–3), 139–147.
Levermore, G. J., Lowe, D., & Ure, J. (1999). Occupant feedback questionnaire producing a fingerprint and a score. ASHRAE Transactions, 105(2), 661–670.
Malone, P. S., & Lubansky, J. B. (2012). Preparing Data for structural equation modeling: doing your homework. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
McCullough, E. A., Eckels, S., & Harms, C. (2009). Determining temperature ratings for children’s cold weather clothing. Applied Ergonomics, 40(5), 870–877. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.12.004.
Ncube, M., & Riffat, S. (2012). Developing an indoor environment quality tool for assessment of mechanically ventilated office buildings in the UK—a preliminary study. Building and Environment, 53, 26–33.
Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowits, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post occupancy evaluation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: a resource for social scientist and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sekaran, U. (2006). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Shuang, G.W., Kamaruzzaman, S.N. & Zulkifli, N. (2014). Occupants’ perception on indoor performance of historical museum: a case study of National Museum and Perak Museum, Malaysia. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Dubai (UAE).
Wolkoff, P. (2013). Indoor air pollutants in office environments: assessment of comfort, health, and performance. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 216(4), 371–394.
Zimring, C. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation and implicit theories of organizational decision-making. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association- Pomona, CA. 277–280.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the High Impact Research (HIR) grant, no. UM.C/625/1/HIR/ASH/013, established at the University of Malaya.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Questionnaire on indoor air quality and assessment of how much you like your building
Thank you so much for your cooperation
Terima kasih atas kerjasama anda
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamaruzzaman, S.N., Egbu, C.O., Zawawi, E.M.A. et al. Occupants’ satisfaction toward building environmental quality: structural equation modeling approach. Environ Monit Assess 187, 242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4447-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4447-0